The
greatest
debate
..The
Al-Qaeda
and
the
kinetic
one
face
to
face
1-12-2005
[
the
writer
:
Louis
is
a
gift]
They
will
compose
books
about
me
!
Why
؟
what
she
is
your
damnable
achievements
؟
No
thing
but
I
could
the
confirmation
that
you
did
not
achieve
a
thing
!
And
what
at
you
now
so
that
she
says
it
؟
What
any
Louis
says
is
Allah
gift
an
another
one
is
!
More
of
the
mental
and
theoretical
confirmations
on
the
correctness
of
the
militants
choice
are
from
the
Al-Qaeda
Network
..
And
your
choices
discredited
..
That
was
the
end
of
the
stormy
dialogue
between
me
and
between
one
of
traditional
kinetic
commands
and
that
will
symbolize
its
name
by
(
Yasser
's
father
) .
The
dialogue
started
by
the
next
form
:
Yasser
's
father
said
:
have
was
hitting
September
a
dangerous
event
from
him
the
call
was
harmed
a
lot
and
instigated
the
world
against
us
.
I
said
:
our
feeling
why
you
did
not
prevent
it؟
He
said
:
and
how
we
prevent
it؟
I
said
O
Yasser
's
father
:
you
are
widespread
groups
and
you
have
scientists
and
cultural
commands
and
a
dynamics
and
the
professors
of
universities
and
personalities
effective
in
most
of
the
Arab
countries
then
how
became
possible
for
Ibn
Ladn
that
he
makes
the
history
and
he
charms
the
people
hearts
and
he
becomes
a
pole
in
the
confrontation
of
the
West,
and
how
became
possible
to
him
that
he
puts
the
West
in
a
confrontation
open
and
broad
and
hot
with
the
Islam,
while
you
are
paralytics,
until
the
news
you
do
not
know
them
except
from
the
mass
medias
.
He
said
:
and
what
might
us
if
we
do
in
front
of
this
group
from
the
rashes؟
I
said
:
Allah
glory
be
there
you
said
a
group
of
the
rashes,
as
if
you
return
words
that
the
western
media
use
when
it
describes
its
war
against
them
that
it
against
(
the
Al-Qaeda
remnants
) a
pain
you
ask
yourselves
how
the
rash
can
makes
the
history
and
draws
the
carpet
from
at
the
feet
of
all
؟
then
how
they
can
and
they
are
a
small
as
in
your
description
of
them
group
that
they
handle
in
the
name
of
Islam
and
make
this
international
attraction
؟
but
how
the
rash
can
penetrates
the
strongest
intelligences
in
the
world
and
prepares
that
complicated
operation
while
he
under
a
sight
and
a
sight
and
the
follow-up
of
the
world
but
and
he
is
besieged
and
homeless
it
is
not
about
to
that
gets
its
day's
living؟
Yasser
's
father
said
:
be
patient
a
moment,
we
did
not
assert
after
by
that
Ben
Laden
and
his
group
behind
the
operation
and
there
are
still
many
indications
that
other
authorities
may
be
behind
it,
and
what
it
mentioned
is
from
their
being
besieged
and
observed
and
homeless
and
poor
and
being
the
operation
he
needs
an
ultimate
accuracy
and
a
repair
and
a
success
in
every
steps
the
execution
he
is
about
to
that
makes
an
universe
Ben
Laden
and
his
group
behind
the
work
an
impossible
matter
.
But
leave
me
I
repeat
on
you
what
one
of
our
kinetic
colleagues
said
if
all
of
the
groups
and
the
Islamic
movements
and
the
Islamic
states
and
their
intelligences
met
what
could
the
execution
of
such
operation
.
I
said
:
does
she
want
my
explanation
that
you
believe
that
the
Muslim
is
impossible
that
it
succeeds
in
a
complicated
work
as
this
and
it
does
not
succeed
by
it
except
the
unbeliever؟
He
said
: I
did
not
say
that
but
the
accident
is
big
and
terrific
that
is
about
to
is
impossible
that
it
executes
without
a
conspiring
from
Alsi
verses
yes
or
the
Mossad
or
their
proverbs
.
I
said
:
so
that
we
bear
clear,
a
difference
is
between
that
another
power
is
behind
the
work
totally
and
between
that
it
Ben
Laden
executed
it
with
conspiring
from
Alsi
verses
yes,
do
for
you
that
he
chooses
between
them؟
He
said
:
there
a
speech
many
and
proofs
that
the
accident
is
not
from
Ben
Laden
's
industry
and
the
Al-Qaeda
.
The
people
reported
a
lot
of
the
proofs
and
summarized
the
proofs
in
a
book
hopefully
you
heard
about
it
.
I
said
:
he
softened
and
that
French
that
wrote
its
book
I
assert
that
it
is
mad
or
it
requests
a
fame
but
here
observing
on
your
speech,
first,
if
the
state
was
also
then
why
you
blame
Ben
Laden
if
؟
the
man
is
not
responsible
according
to
your
claim
then
why
we
consider
Ben
Laden
it
caused
a
damage
of
the
Islamic
work
and
instigated
the
world
against
us
as
says
؟
a
second,
does
it
expect
that
America
composes
all
this
broad
long
story
and
it
shows
Ben
Laden
himself
and
praises
the
mentioned
names
and
despite
that
is
Ibn
Ladn
and
the
Al-Qaeda
have
not
any
role
in
the
subject؟
He
said
that
the
issue
is
complicated,
complicates
the
assertion
of
this
or
this
but
Dana
is
a
transfer
if
the
rule
was
behind
the
operation
then
no
escape
from
conspiring
greatest
international
intelligences
like
Alsi
verses
yes
or
the
Mossad
.
I
said
:
our
feeling
..You
are
ready
that
she
imagines
that
Alsi
any
verses
or
the
Mossad
conspires
with
Ben
Laden
and
not
I
ready
that
they
imagines
that
Ben
Laden
and
its
group
or
a
delivered
authority
can
achieves
it
to
its
alone؟
He
said
: I
did
not
say
that,
but
she
meant
that
Alsi
is
verses
yes
or
the
Mossad
might
have
penetrated
Ben
Laden
and
its
group
and
drove
them
to
this
behaviour
and
facilitated
making
a
success
the
operation
without
conspiring
in
an
open
way؟
I
said
:
he
means
you
if
ready
that
she
imagines
that
Alsi
is
verses
yes
or
the
Mossad
runs
this
complicated
work
with
each
efficiency
and
despite
that
they
not
can
now
that
they
knows
Ben
Laden
's
place
now
؟
and
another
question,
you
are
ready
that
they
imagines
that
Alsi
is
verses
yes
or
the
Mossad
runs
this
complicated
work
with
each
efficiency
and
a
thing
does
not
leak
from
its
penetration
and
I
am
not
ready
because
it
believes
that
Ben
Laden
and
its
group
can
achieve
such
work؟
He
said
:
Yasser
's
father
who
said
that
America
does
not
know
Ben
Laden
's
place
now
?
if
we
imagined
that
the
work
is
from
Alsi
verses
yes
to
the
Taliban
destruction
target
and
the
control
in
Central
Asia
and
do
not
think
you
that
is
ignorant
that
America
has
a
strategic
target
in
the
guarantee
of
the
arrival
of
the
supplies
of
Qazwin
Sea
oil
and
the
reduction
of
the
dependence
on
the
Gulf
region
oil
and
therefore,
from
America
interest
Ben
Laden
's
staying
to
the
justification
of
its
continuous
presence
and
an
ideal
position
does
not
find
like
the
current
situation
the
Americans
they
declare
that
their
staying
in
Afghanistan
he
will
lengthen
!
Alis
what
happened
is
an
achievement
of
strategic
target
of
America
related
to
Caspian
oil
؟
as
for
the
other
question
then
he
how
excellent
this
a
terrific
work
we
was
not
used
that
Muslims
execute
it
and
it
is
possible
that
America
hides
a
terrific
work
he
acted
this
as
it
hid
the
Bay
of
Pigs
operation
.
I
said
: O
Yasser
's
father
what
I
said
is
the
not
reasonable
one
of
the
most
things
that
heard
them
and
wonder
at
this
mentality
the
imaginary
Almaamratia,
means
you
are
ready
that
these
intelligences
imagine
Palmyra
the
Pentagon
and
the
trade
center
and
they
give
the
prestige
of
America
in
the
heart
by
purpose
operation
in
the
complication
and
the
seriousness
internationally
and
all
that
that
from
him
a
thing
does
not
leak
is
achieved
only
for
the
justification
of
the
Taliban
hitting
؟
was
hitting
the
Taliban
was
requiring
such
justification
؟
if
you
were
a
president
to
America
or
Alsi
verses
yes
was
I
was
would
choosing
this
choice
for
the
justification
of
hitting
Taliban
and
the
Al-Qaeda
?
and
you
are
ready
that
it
inclines
by
you
the
shadow
to
all
that
and
they
do
not
imagine
or
imagines
that
the
Al-Qaeda
can
achieve
the
work
by
all
his
details
by
their
single
؟
as
for
the
strategic
target
then
leave
me
I
agree
with
you
that
America
has
a
target
actually
in
the
issue
of
Caspian
oil
but
this
strategic
target
separate
totally
about
what
are
we
in
him,
we
speak
about
the
operation
of
11
September
and
you
use
the
issue
of
Caspian
oil
as
a
presumption
for
the
correction
of
the
conspiracy
theory
and
that
America
hit
herself
so
that
they
come
to
Afghanistan
..
Our
feeling
this
is
a
wild
imagination
and
being
America
it
wants
Caspian
oil
that
do
not
mean
at
all
that
it
will
hit
herself
for
the
sake
of
the
achievement
of
this
target
but
with
the
recognition
of
the
Americans,
they
Kano
they
plan
for
the
war
of
Talban
before
11
September
by
a
long
period
..
By
a
colloquial
expression
(
Ben
Laden
had
lunch
by
them
before
they
dine
by
him
and
by
Talban
)
..
Then
does
she
believe
that
the
credibility
of
America
remains
with
the
non
arrest
of
Ben
Laden
or
his
killing
?
and
if
I
was
actually
believing
that
America
knows
Ben
Laden
's
place,
and
it
does
not
want
the
arrest
on
it
then
advise
you
on
eating
the
radish
since
it
is
said
there
is
for
it
an
effect
in
the
rise
of
the
vapours
to
the
brain
until
(
Ynadl
)
the
mood
this
what
it
said
in
(
Almgsti
) !
He
said
:
give
up
you
the
irony
!
I
said
I
do
not
exploit
but
you
speak
in
a
thing
from
Althrif
and
it
does
not
benefit
with
you
except
what
the
lunatic
with
Ubay
Yousef
Alqadi
did,
and
does
he
know
what
did
Alyan
in
its
debate
of
Ubay
Yousef
Alqadi
؟
He
said
that
informed
me
She
was
less
Alyan
saw
Aba
Yousef
walks
then
he
said
for
him
O
Aba
Yousef
an
issue
؟
then
Abu
Yousef
said
that
drew
Alyan
said
: O
Aba
Yousef
Alis
Allah
said
(
and
what
from
an
animal
in
earth
and
no
bird
flies
by
his
wings
except
the
nations
of
your
as
what
wasted
the
Book
from
a
thing
)
Abu
Yousef
said
that
softened
Alyan
said
:
and
Alis
is
Allah
he
said
(
and
from
a
nation
except
in
it
a
herald
became
empty
)
Abu
Yousef
said
that
softened
Alyan
said
:
then
from
the
dogs
herald
O
Aba
Yousef
؟
He
looked
into
Abu
Yousef
contemplative
and
wondering
!
And
he
said
..I
do
not
know
that
informed
me
from
(
the
dogs
herald
)
Alyan
said
no
until
he
orders
for
me
Bfalothg
..
He
ordered
Abu
Yousef
who
comes
to
for
him
his
request
then
took
it
to
the
mosque
and
Abu
Yousef
sat
and
his
students
wait
for
Alyan
the
lunatic
until
he
finishes
the
food,
then
not
he
finished
that
Abu
Yousef
said
..You
come
here
! O
Alyan
informed
us
from
the
dogs
herald
؟
I
smile
Alyan
then
he
brought
from
his
pocket
( a
stone
)
and
said
..
This
is
the
dogs
herald
O
Aba
Yousef
!
Yasser
's
father
made
laugh
and
said
:
so
that
we
run
to
what
we
were
in
him
then
added
:
he
believed
me
that
does
not
enable
us
the
imagination
that
the
Al-Qaeda
can
achieves
this
work
to
its
alone,
and
as
for
the
credibility
of
America
then
he
how
excellent
that
faced
a
challenge
but
the
American
gains
are
from
the
control
of
the
region
and
the
domination
on
middles
Asia
more
important
than
the
preservation
of
a
credibility
in
Ben
Laden
's
killing
.
And
they
-
anyway
-
they
have
gained
a
big
credibility
in
the
eradication
of
Talban
and
stuffed
the
Al-Qaeda
individuals
in
Guantanamo
cages
.
I
said
that
the
English
said
:
he
searched
for
the
woman
and
the
Arab
nationalists
said
:
he
searched
for
the
Jews
..
And
the
kinetic
time
came
the
Islamic
so
that
they
say
:
it
searched
for
the
Americans
!
As
for
your
being
no
is
possible
you
the
imagination
that
the
Al-Qaeda
that
the
achievement
of
this
work
enables
then
she
is
your
problem
you
alone
and
who
gathered
them
in
your
speech
(
it
does
not
enable
us
)
of
whom
he
carries
the
self
cerebral
content
..
We
can
say
according
to
your
speaking
that
you
wait
for
the
occurrence
of
the
events
so
that
they
search
for
an
American
interpretation
of
them,
by
a
meaning
they
search
for
an
interpretation
built
that
America
is
behind
each
event
and
a
wanted
disagreement
thing
can't
happen
America
؟
an
event
September
himself
conspiring
from
America,
Ben
Laden
's
leaving
greeted
conspiring
from
America
.
He
was
perfumed
if
America
has
this
great
ability
in
the
industry
of
the
events
and
the
control
of
the
history
and
the
ability
for
the
penetration
of
all
people
then
why
herself
hurts
all
this
harming
and
causes
a
killing
the
destruction
thousands
facilities
it
represents
the
heart
of
America
capitalism
and
is
exposed
to
this
danger
for
the
sake
of
the
execution
of
a
project
in
Afghanistan
؟
why
does
immediately
in
the
execution
of
what
wants
and
a
salvation
it
does
not
start
?
what
she
is
the
problem
that
the
crash
of
America
is
Talban
؟
the
Northern
Alliance
is
ready
originally
for
the
cooperation
with
it
from
a
time
but
directs
to
it
the
blame
from
years
.
And
she
as
long
as
America
penetrating
the
Al-Qaeda
and
the
Taliban
then
its
ability
for
their
destruction
and
the
destruction
of
the
Taliban
it
does
not
need
September
operation
.
You
are
now
between
two
choices
or
that
she
says
that
America
is
the
one
that
controlled
the
events
and
that
it
has
a
superior
ability
it
enables
it
originally
the
destruction
of
Talban
without
it
searches
for
a
justification,
or
that
it
recognizes
that
America
was
surprised
with
the
event
as
other
was
surprised
.
Yasser
's
father
said
:
obligations
do
not
oblige
me
that
do
not
accept
them,
America
has
a
superior
ability
a
right
but
they
need
some
times
justifications؟
I
said
:
justifications
what
and
who
with
the
one
that
will
stand
in
their
face
according
to
your
speaking
and
your
imagination
of
America
force
that
present
it
؟
and
do
the
justifications
arrive
to
an
event
by
like
a
hugeness
and
the
complication
of
September
event؟
She
felt
that
I
besiege
Yasser
's
father
and
that
appeared
from
his
expression
where
he
said
:
he
does
not
understand
from
my
speech
that
I
asserted
that,
but
the
historical
experience
shows
that
America
is
ready
for
the
sacrifice
of
some
of
its
citizens
or
its
allies
for
the
sake
of
strategic
targets
.
I
said
: (
she
marks
me
by
a
lizard
I
ground
it
؟
) I
conscious
of
what
says
but
take
in
your
mind
that
September
events
are
first
a
national
disaster
with
the
American
calculations,
second
dead
by
the
thousands,
a
third
the
work
of
a
purpose
in
the
complication
the
conspiring
needs
in
it
many
levels
the
preservation
of
the
secrecy
in
it
turns,
all
that
a
return
what
؟
a
justification
؟
a
justification
what
؟
from
the
one
that
will
refuse
the
will
of
America
in
the
region
؟
the
Muslims
؟
you
said
that
they
are
incapable,
the
Russians,
the
European
ones
؟
who؟
And
for
the
getting
out
of
the
dilemma
it
said
:
leave
us
we
say
that
the
question
is
existing
and
it
sufficed
and
do
not
close
the
door
in
front
of
this
probability
.
I
said
for
it
and
she
has
shot
its
compliment
..!
O
my
friend
if
a
kick
came
to
you
from
the
behind
then
it
does
not
become
disturbed
then
I
is
still
in
the
introduction
..!!
And
we
have
finished
the
first
case
that
contradicted
in
it
at
the
beginning
of
a
sentence
where
I
decided
that
the
call
was
harmed
because
of
actions
(
the
group
)
then
there
you
at
the
end
you
say
that
the
Al-Qaeda
did
not
execute
the
operation
of
its
alone
and
the
question
it
is
still
existing
around
the
presence
of
conspiring
parties
for
the
facilitation
of
the
operation
whether
by
the
rule
science
or
without
its
knowledge
..
After
that
the
discussion
turned
to
the
side
of
another
and
she
what
if
it
was
decided
that
the
Al-Qaeda
is
behind
the
operation
in
an
independent
way
totally
finally
:
I
said
:
our
feeling
I
understand
from
your
speech
that
it
just
an
inquiry
and
not
a
putting
in
the
apocopative
I
mean
around
a
case
from
the
responsible
for
the
operation
.If
we
imposed
the
reverse
it
means
that
it
was
proved
definitely
-
and
will
see
that
soon
God
willing
-
that
Ben
Laden
and
his
group
planned
for
this
work
and
executed
it
by
purpose
way
in
the
accuracy
and
the
independence
and
the
secrecy
without
an
intervention
and
no
conspiring
from
one
of
what
will
be
your
situation؟
Yasser
's
father
said
:
we
will
force
that
we
recognize
that
he
is
the
success
in
the
execution
of
a
complicated
operation
of
a
purpose
in
the
complication
and
the
difficulty
we
was
not
used
that
the
Muslims
can
execution
its
like
.
But
this
recognition
does
not
mean
the
acceptance
of
the
work
himself
.
By
another
expression
we
will
consider
it
an
unprecedented
mastery
in
a
means,
but
to
a
wrong
but
destructive
target,
destructive
to
the
call,
to
the
charitable
work,
a
cause
in
the
eradication
of
a
resulting
Islamic
state
she
is
Talban,
justifying
to
a
permanent
American
campaign
on
the
Islam
under
the
pretext
of
the
terrorism
.
I
said
:
Dana
we
complete
the
talk
about
the
means
first,
does
he
believe
that
this
operation
was
can
taking
place
but
for
a
support
and
Tawfiq
Rbani؟
He
said
:
we
agreed
that
it
needs
an
extraordinary
genius
in
the
execution
but
what
means
with
the
divine
support
?
why
it
assumes
that
Allah
is
satisfied
with
this
operation
؟
this
operation
as
it
said
the
Arabs
(
month
legume
and
time
thorns
)
and
is
still
blazing
by
its
thorns
..
I
said
:
as
for
and
has
cited
the
Arabs
proverbs
:
they
have
said
also
in
their
proverbs
(
the
Romans
if
they
did
not
invade,
they
invade
),
and
what
did
Ben
Laden
is
more
than
to
he
invaded
them
!And
as
for
being
the
operation
it
has
obtained
Tawfiq
Rbani
then
a
frying
of
me
how
these
by
a
human
effort
just
can
execute
the
work
of
a
purpose
in
the
complication
and
the
details
and
it
takes
all
this
time
and
needs
a
human
and
Malian
movement
and
many
logistic
details
without
revealing
a
thing
from
that
؟
and
how
it
succeeds
all
kidnapping
states
in
detail
and
gets
three
of
it
its
targets
accurately
؟
and
how
both
the
trade
center
buildings
collapse
while
she
is
insistent
assuming
that
it
resists
originally
to
the
accident
of
plane
collision
؟
did
she
read
the
long
list
who
CNN
spread
to
the
conditions
that
should
be
available
until
the
trade
center
collapses
acted
and
all
was
available
in
both
my
state
the
two
planes
that
hit
the
trade
center؟
Yasser
's
father
said
and
his
lineaments
have
become
open
and
thought
that
he
found
in
an
expression
(
Tawfiq
Rbani
) a
holder
..
These
issues
can't
say
that
they
are
Tawfiq
Rbani,
the
fourth
plane
for
example
did
not
injure
their
target,
this
most
probably
a
success
in
a
side
and
problems
on
the
other
side
.
I
said
: O
our
generous
professor
the
fourth
plane
did
not
fall
except
after
its
kidnapping
and
the
kidnapping
as
such
that
happened
and
its
non
injury
of
its
target
does
not
come
a
thing
in
front
of
the
terrific
achievement
in
the
destruction
of
the
trade
center
and
his
collapse
in
front
of
the
television
cameras
.
He
said
so
that
he
settles
the
speech
about
the
issue
of
the
divine
reconciliation
:
I
believe
that
the
calculation
is
by
this
way
a
difficult
and
liquefied
divine
reconciliation
built
that
the
project
or
the
target
are
a
matter
interest
the
Islam
and
the
Muslims
and
we
believe
that
the
accident
is
harmful
to
the
Muslims
and
destructive
to
them
as
mentioned
then
how
it
is
in
it
Tawfiq
Rbani؟
I
said
:
our
feeling
despite
your
recognition
of
the
genius
of
the
operation
and
your
inability
in
the
beginning
on
the
imagination
that
Muslims
did
it
then
when
the
settlement
of
this
case
was
postponed
and
said
that
the
question
was
still
existing,
and
it
was
less
for
you
for
a
transfer
the
proofs
will
prove
that
it
is
from
doing
Muslims
then
it
was
less
(
we
will
force
that
we
recognize
that
it
is
the
success
in
the
execution
of
a
complicated
operation
of
a
purpose
in
the
complication
and
the
difficulty
we
was
not
used
that
the
Muslims
can
execution
its
like
)
and
despite
that
it
does
not
want
the
recognition
that
there
is
a
divine
guidance
if
Muslims
did
it
according
to
Chkikk
.
As
for
we
then
we
believe
the
assertion
that
Allah
glory
be
to
it
facilitated
to
the
militants
from
the
Al-Qaeda
Network
all
of
the
ways
until
they
succeeded
in
the
leveling
of
America
edifices
on
her
own
ground
and
do
not
understand
a
meaning
for
the
divine
reconciliation
if
this
was
not
a
guidance
and
have
remained
our
lovers
from
the
Al-Qaeda
Network
six
months
or
more
they
submit
and
pray
to
Allah
that
the
operation
succeeds,
you
are
needy
actually
for
the
meditation
of
the
operation
details
since
the
initial
preparation
to
them
before
two
years
approximately
then
the
creative
success
in
directing
the
planes
until
the
moments
of
their
collision
in the
two
towers
..
The
description
of
the
impossibility
of
the
execution
of
the
operation
from
Muslims
as
say
and
our
certainty
in
advance
that
the
militants
are
he
that
makes
PRLNKA
assert
that
in
the
matter
Tawfiq
Rbani
is
clear
that
each
believer
sees
by
Allah
and
its
messenger
!But
this
returns
us
to
a
very
important
question
and
he
how
Ben
Laden
succeeds
in
the
control
in
America
and
its
provocation
against
the
Islam
all
and
makes
this
attraction
and
not
thinks
one
of
at
all
that
he
turns
to
you
besides
that
punching
a
role
is
in
the
prevention
of
America
from
targeting
Islam
and
call
and
the
charitable
work
؟
why
do
your
terrific
cadres
and
your
broad
relations
and
your
big
spread
did
not
benefit
in
the
prevention
of
the
consequences
of
September
events
?
why
all
world
experts
agree
in
the
politics
and
the
history
and
the
meeting
that
what
is
after
11
September
different
from
what
he
accepted
and
did
not
hear
about
one
of
he
pointed
to
you
and
if
in
a
limited
way؟
Yasser
's
father
said
that
I
did
not
refuse
the
recognition
that
the
work
is
big
and
terrific
and
articular
in
the
history
but
was
less
he
is
harmful,
and
does
not
contradict
his
universe
is
big
and
great
with
being
a
harmful
.
You
said
that
Ben
Laden
made
this
attraction,
good,
do
this
attraction
benefit
the
Muslims
?
or
their
food
a
weakness
on
double
؟
but
and
America
considered
lawful
them
and
the
falcons
sounds
of
American
administration
and
the
Jews
appeared
it
demands
the
deterrence
of
the
Muslims
and
their
education,
but
they
dared
and
demanded
the
destruction
of
the
Kaaba
!
And
some
of
their
fools
demanded
the
bombardment
of
the
Islamic
countries
with
the
nuclear
weapons
until
the
Muslims
are
submitted
over
what
they
are
controlled,
then
this
all
proves
that
the
work
harmed
the
Islam
and
the
Muslims
.
I
said
:
it
is
a
must
if
he
praised
with
your
recognition
that
this
work
is
any
11
September
a
big
great
and
articular
work
in
the
history,
and
he
a
last
with
the
genius
of
the
rule
recognition
is
not
in
the
ability
for
the
execution
but
with
the
ability
for
an
industry
a
great
and
terrific
event
despite
being
it
witnesses
a
blockade
and
a
follow-up
and
an
international
conspiracy
against
it
.
He
said
: a
thank
you
and
this
at
me
reserved
it
we
said
goodbye
that
exceed
it,
the
case
is
that
we
believe
that
the
work
is
harmful
a
great
damage
and
destructive
to
the
call
and
the
charitable
work
and
as
I
said
that
caused
the
removal
of
a
youthful
Islamic
state
from
the
presence
I
said
: I
should
give
you
my
opinion
first
in
an
issue
do
the
work
is
harmful
or
not
harmful,
as
for
its
universe
is
harmful
then
I
do
not
agree
with
you
in
it
because
the
greatest
gain
for
this
work
is
the
false
state
of
peace
revelation
between
the
Muslims
and
the
west
then
this
stairs
was
not
true
at
all
since
they
succeeded
in
the
fragmentation
of
the
Islamic
countries
to
small
countries
and
divided
it
to
(
the
republics
of
clover
and
the
kingdoms
of
dung
and
colocynth
and
dates
and
an
oil
)
belonging
to
them
and
gave
birth
everywhere
my
joint
in
the
Islamic
world
a
military
base
or
an
army
for
the
guarantee
of
the
Muslims
staying
under
the
submission
..
Then
they
established
a
false
peace,
a
peace
we
continue
we
in
it
enslaved
and
they
are
the
masters,
if
it
came
to
Ben
Laden
and
the
Al-Qaeda
and
fought
for
bringing
these
infidels
that
said
that
harmed
the
call
؟
how
he
harms
the
call
and
the
call
originally
he
does
not
possess
the
right
of
its
self-determination
؟
if
was
your
concept
for
the
call
he
a
lesson
you
cast
it
into
a
mosque
or
a
lecture
in
an
university
and
you
can
not
that
you
exceed
the
lines
Alhmr
who
the
ruler
defined,
then
this
is
not
a
call,
this
a
falsification
to
the
religion
and
a
cancellation
of
the
meaning
of
his
saying
rose
(
and
the
religion
all
is
to
Allah
)
and
you
when
you
live
in
these
Qatari
countries
with
the
borders
and
the
restrictions
that
the
ruler
put
on
you
do
not
benefit
the
call
but
harm
it
from
where
that
you
devote
the
falsification
of
the
true
Islam
that
should
tell
him
a
complete
without
interference
from
a
ruler
or
a
prince
or
a
king
..
And
what
the
base
did
is
that
it
started
a
fight
to
be
the
religion
all
of
Allah
and
not
some
of
it
as
do
you
in
your
call
..
But
the
worst
and
the
matter
be
that
these
Qatari
countries
and
the
borders
that
the
colonist
put
become
deep-rooted
concepts
at
number
of
your
intellectuals
when
they
speak
about
(
the
homeland
)
and
they
say
for
us
that
you
bargain
with
us
and
you
give
the
option
us
between
(
the
jihad
)
and
(
the
homeland
)
then
we
say
for
them
O
needy
Ben
Laden
loves
the
homeland
more
than
you
but
the
homeland
that
Ben
Laden
and
its
men
defends
is
not
the
homeland
that
holds
in
it
an
American
recruit
by
the
rifle
so
that
he
protects
the
grandsons
of
Companions
and
oil
and
if
he
obstructs
the
Companions
grandsons,
he
subjects
them
..
This
homeland
is
not
our
homeland
and
not
Ben
Laden
's
homeland
and
no
the
militants
this
a
big
prison
you
name
it
a
falsehood
(
the
homeland
)
..
As
for
the
homeland
that
defends
it
then
he
each
land
in
it
the
call
of
the
right
grumbled
singing
and
sung,
and
the
first
land
we
should
defend
it
the
two
Holy
Mosques
countries
..And
she
is
the
countries
that
our
grandfathers
watered
their
land
by
their
blood
so
that
he
comes
the
Americans
today
and
occupy
them
؟
and
stand
watching
we
chant
by
glories
(
the
homeland
)
and
claim
that
we
defend
the
homeland
؟
and
here
I
ask
you
a
main
question,
by
your
attribute
they
participate
in
a
great
kinetic
Islamic
work,
the
totalitarianism
and
the
universality
and
the
seeking
not
for
enabling
the
Allah's
religion
in
earth
decided
cases
in
your
thought
and
your
program
and
your
plan؟
Yasser
's
father
appeared
gloomy
then
he
kept
silent
for
a
few
moments
..
And
he
answered
: a
decided
yes,
but
its
decrease
on
the
reality
needs
a
consideration
of
this
reality
and
before
that
that
needs
the
understanding
of
this
reality
.
I
smiled
and
said
in
myself
..A
bravo
I
love
this
kind
of
the
answers
that
opens
to
you
other
many
doors
for
throwing
a
more
of
the
difficult
questions
and
here
that
surprised
Yasser
's
father
with
the
question
:
our
feeling,
what
he
is
your
adaptation
to
this
reality؟
He
said
:
the
reality
that
the
Muslims
including
the
preachers
and
the
scientists
are
weak
in
all
land
countries
and
is
not
it
is
wise
that
the
Muslims
jump
for
the
combating
jihad
before
they
complete
their
instruments
.
I
said
that
I
want
a
more
answer
specifically
in
the
description
of
the
reality,
we
do
not
want
a
speech
a
year,
we
want
a
specific
answer
around
the
Islam
situation
internationally,
who
he
is
the
main
opponent
of
the
Islam
as
a
debt
and
a
message
and
what
she
is
formal
its
war
on
the
Islam
؟
and
how
it
succeeded
in
the
diminution
of
the
Islam؟
He
believed
in
complaint
!
And
why
does
she
take
us
to
the
international
level
?
leave
us
we
settle
our
Qatari
affairs
and
the
local
ones
then
we
think
by
the
international
level
.
I
said
:
Allah
glory
be
to,
a
pain
you
say
that
the
universality
of
the
Islam
is
integral
part
of
your
thought
and
your
principles
؟
then
why
it
separates
your
Qatari
affair
as
says
about
the
international
affair
؟
the
creator
Allah
put
the
oil
in
our
land
then
it
came
to
the
Americans
and
occupied
our
countries
then
became
we
part
of
the
universality
we
wanted
or
we
refused
..
Then
he
noticed
that
your
talk
is
about
the
universality
of
the
Islam
a
deception
of
the
breath
then
you
actually
devote
a
concept
(
the
regional
Islam
or
the
Qatari
)
when
you
present
the
problem
in
a
local
way
and
want
the
description
of
the
Islam
problem
that
it
is
a
diagonal
problem
related
to
the
so-and-so
country,
and
you
realize
well
that
the
Islam
refuses
totally
all
this
paper
entities
the
list
is
in
the
Islamic
countries
under
the
auspices
of
the
West,
and
you
are
by
your
sayings
and
especially
the
last
from
it
like
your
call
(
to
the
civil
society
)
you
declare
with
each
rudeness
the
failure
of
your
carrying
for
the
call
to
the
Islam
as
an
universal
religion
that
does
not
relate
to
the
imaginary
limits
that
the
colonist
made,
but
it
does
not
recognize
it
a
launching
..
Your
call
is
to
the
civil
society
the
declaration
of
a
defeat
from
you
of
all
of
the
principles
that
were
carrying
them
about
the
Islam
..
But
and
some
of
your
intellectuals
became
being
ignorant
the
difference
between
the
pure
Salafi
Islam
and
that
the
Salafiya
as
principles
is
the
better
guarantee
for
the
preservation
of
the
society
rights
and
between
a
concept
(
the
civil
society
)
that
circulates
it
..
And
you
not
needy
for
borrowing
the
concepts
from
the
liberals
until
you
rant
the
civil
society
and
you
do
not
realize
its
truth
and
that
it
is
actually
a
devotion
of
the
concept
of
the
Qatari
country
that
the
Islam
refuses
radically
..
But
for
me
she
is
not
said
the
Salafi
Islam
devoted
the
tyranny
because
I
will
say
for
you
the
official
Islam
that
a
coalition
with
these
sultans
and
the
kings
lying
on
our
chests
is
not
the
Islam
that
Allah
ordered
it
and
the
Salafi
one
the
truth
free
of
it
..
And
the
talk
about
the
civil
society
we
do
not
see
it
only
an
escape
from
the
responsibility
in
the
incrimination
of
the
ruler
to
the
exaggeration
in
the
talk
about
the
backwardness
of
the
society
and
its
enterprises
.
By
Allah
on
you
how
you
want
that
you
establish
the
enterprises
of
the
civil
and
ruling
society
lying
on
they
exported
you
until
the
respiration
you
can
not
that
you
breathe
؟
it
informed
me
of
a
big
single
change
in
the
history
that
started
with
the
enterprises
of
the
civil
society
؟
and
for
your
knowledge,
the
civil
society
in
Europe
started
with
an
expression
(
you
hang
an
another
one
it
possessed
by
the
intestines
of
priest
another
one
)
!!
Yasser
's
father
said
:
as
for
the
issue
of
the
civil
society
then
this
may
be
a
means
for
the
attainment
of
the
rights
and
not
wanting
borrowing
the
concept
of
the
civil
society
a
complete
and
as
for
your
speech
about
the
universality
of
the
Islam
then
being
also
does
not
mean
that
we
do
that
is
not
in
our
energy,
and
is
not
it
is
wise
that
he
involves
the
human
himself
or
other
in
a
bigger
square
from
him
or
a
stronger
enemy
from
him
.
I
said
:
we
will
postpone
the
talk
about
the
civil
society
to
an
another
time,
but
I
should
say
that
it
from
the
favour
be
that
it
recognizes
that
the
issue
is
an
inability,
but
my
question
is
not
about
your
abilities,
my
question
of
he
about
your
air-conditioning
to
who
he
is
the
first
opponent
to
the
Islam
and
how
it
succeeded
in
the
diminution
of
the
Islam؟
He
said
: I
do
not
believe
that
there
who
argues
that
America
supports
and
it
adopts
Israel
and
waiting
for
the
Islam
and
the
Muslims
and
fights
them
and
besieges
them
by
more
than
a
picture,
and
we
do
not
doubt
at
all
that
it
diminished
the
Islamic
project
throughout
its
agents
from
the
referees
in
the
Islamic
world
and
its
control
of
what
is
named
the
international
organizations,
this
all
we
do
not
argue
about
it,
but
we
believe
that
the
stage
is
upbringing
stage
and
a
settlement
and
a
legitimate
consolidation
and
a
protection
the
missionary
and
charitable
active
acquisitions
in
the
Islamic
world
all
.
And
not
occurs
by
our
mind
that
the
confrontation
of
America
a
priority
at
all
.
I
said
:
do
the
issue
is
the
non
priority
or
she
is
an
inability
and
the
underestimation
of
the
ego
؟
it
cares
about
another
expression
if
was
targeting
or
the
confrontation
of
America
are
not
a
priority
then
do
he
is
in
your
program
a
demand
or
a
late
step
and
postponed
it
conviction
of
the
necessity
of
its
postponement
until
it
completes
the
readiness
or
he
is
a
project
it
did
not
come
originally
in
your
plan
؟
and
a
wish
I
want
the
answer
of
this
question
honestly
and
an
impartiality
.
My
last
expression
provoked
Yasser
's
father
and
bothered
with
it
and
said
:
No
a
calling
because
she
entrusts
me
with
the
honesty
and
the
impartiality,
leave
me
I
bear
a
frank
with
you
in
this,
do
not
have
a
clear
political
plan
besides
the
confrontation
of
America
.
Yes
there
is
no
any
plan
for
targeting
America
no
now
and
no
later
on
and
there
is
no
any
strategy
therefore
.
But
why
we
target
America
originally,
when
it
was
less
it
a
priority
has
meant
that
it
is
not
required
originally
.
We
are
not
in
need
that
we
target
America
no
now
and
no
later
on
.
I
said
: I
apologize
O a
sheikh
if
my
expression
was
provocative
but
you
know
the
first
article
:
And
the
debate
of
the
scientists
is
not
Bdaer
* *
*
what
between
their
triumphant
to
the
defeated
But
he
informed
me
what
makes
for
the
confrontation
of
the
American
danger
and
its
fierceness
on
the
Islam
and
the
Muslims
?
do
you
have
a
plan
therefore؟
He
said
:
we
continue
in
the
missionary
and
educational
work
and
the
media
one
and
the
reform
of
the
Muslims
till
that
Allah
facilitates
for
them
suitable
political
regimes
that
may
be
in
the
level
of
the
confrontation
of
the
international
hamlet
whether
with
fight
or
with
political
confrontation
.
I
said
:
do
realizes
brother
that
you
by
this
recognize
two
recognitions
at
the
same
time,
first
you
recognize
that
the
jihad
is
not
calculated
in
your
program
at
all
no
now
and
no
receiving
and
second
you
recognize
to
he
does
not
have
any
plan
for
the
confrontation
of
the
enemy
of
the
first
Islam
...
He
boycotted
me
a
saying
: a
moment
from
he
said
that
the
jihad
is
not
considered,
we
believe
in
the
necessity
of
the
jihad
but
in
its
time
and
its
circumstance
.
Here
she
found
the
opportunity
suitable
for
its
showering
with
the
questions
that
I
realize
well
that
it
will
trick
the
answer
to
it
:
I
said
:
do
you
have
programs
for
the
preparation
of
your
cadres
and
their
training
a
jihad
for
example؟
He
said
:
no,
but
we
do
not
believe
originally
that
we
need
that
؟
we
believe
that
the
obligation
of
the
jihad
is
a
decided
issue
in
the
Sharia
and
can
not
us
that
we
doubt
it
.
I
said
:
our
feeling,
repeat
the
question,
do
you
have
programs
for
the
upbringing
of
your
cadres
a
jihad
in
districts
or
training
camps
or
any
thing
it
represents
them
or
at
least
you
raise
them
on
the
classification
of
the
world
and
the
look
to
it
from
a
jihad
telescope,
and
you
bode
a
state
in
which
the
jihad
caller
calls؟
He
said
:
you
know
that
the
circumstances
do
not
allow
that
at
all,
and
what
names
with
the
jihad
upbringing
opens
on
us
doors
we
in
a
sufficiency
from
them
now
.
And
we
in
the
sentence
against
these
ideas
that
most
probably
reaches
the
destruction
of
the
Islamic
movements
as
happened
in
Egypt
and
Algeria
.
I
said
:
he
means
you
see
that
just
the
jihad
upbringing
and
the
education
of
the
people
be
that
they
talk
to
themselves
about
the
invasion
and
they
are
trained
when
necessary
to
the
future
and
look
at
the
world
by
a
jihad
telescope
an
inadmissible
issue
because
it
brings
upon
you
the
destruction
of
the
Islamic
work
؟
he
was
perfumed
do
other
than
you
prevent
from
doing
him؟
He
said
:
he
softened
because
it
will
lead
to
the
damage
of
all
of
the
Islamic
work
as
happened
after
the
events
of
September
and
as
happened
after
the
events
of
Egypt
and
Algeria,
and
the
Qur'an
it
says
to
who
its
instruments
did
not
become
complete
a
pain
they
see
to
the
ones
who
said
for
them
that
held
back
your
hands
and
performed
the
prayer
.
I
said
:
you
if
was
decided
throughout
this
verse
and
throughout
mixing
Egypt
model
and
Algeria
with
September
form
freezing
the
duty
of
the
combating
jihad
whether
with
the
systems
is
Altaghotia
in
the
Islamic
world
or
with
the
tops
of
the
frank
disbelief
till
that
it
becomes
complete
what
I
named
the
instruments
؟
and
go
to
farther
than
that
then
you
avoid
the
jihad
upbringing
and
the
training
and
the
preparation
until
it
does
not
lead
to
this
result؟
He
said
:
yes
but
she
does
not
understand
from
our
speaking
that
we
annul
the
jihad
duty
but
we
believe
decisive
that
the
jihad
is
a
proved
imposition
by
the
Book
and
the
Sunna
and
from
it
doubted
its
proposition
that
denied
a
known
from
the
religion
necessarily
.
I
said
:
she
does
not
worry
that
will
not
understand
your
speech
of
a
mistake,
but
we
will
need
to
(
Nicolas
then
to
a
more
inclined
)
another
and
(
philosopher
stone
) a
new
until
we
solve
the
problem
that
says
it
!
Since
it
becomes
clear
that
the
belief
in
the
necessity
of
the
jihad
is
a
mere
theoretical
issue
from
your
speech
that
is
not
good
that
it
applies
a
thing
from
it,
and
no
until
the
jihad
upbringing
and
the
preparation
and
the
training
.And
the
verses
of
fight
and
enabling
of
the
Allah's
religion
in
earth
and
the
talks
of
the
incitement
on
the
jihad
and
the
presence
of
a
believing
sect
throughout
ages
raise
the
jihad
flag
and
the
agreement
of
the
scientists
on
the
necessity
of
the
preparation
and
the
pre-Islamic
death
to
who
himself
did
not
talk
about
the
invasion
all
to
frozen
issues؟
I
was
knowing
that
the
speech
about
the
jihad
is
from
the
straits
have
(
the
kinetic
)
and
many
they
blunder
in
them
and
has
stuffed
Yasser
's
father
in
the
angle
and
escapes
by
to
he
said
:
I
fear
that
I
force
the
repetition
of
the
previous
speech
that
elevated
it
but
Dana
uses
a
better
expression
from
a
frozen
and
she
is
postponed
.
I
said
:
for
the
completion
of
the
destruction
on
its
argument
and
the
move
to
a
new
point
:
Our
feeling
the
idea
became
clear
here,
and
we
reached
that
you
have
postponed
or
froze
all
of
the
issues
related
to
the
jihad
and
here
that
will
enter
into
a
problem
that
is
not
with
the
Al-Qaeda
Network
but
with
Allah
Glory
be
to
Him
..
And
I
hope
from
Allah
that
it
has
mercy
on
you
..
But
Dana
exceeds
it
to
a
question
with
more
accuracy
and
he
is
a
return
to
the
reality
adaptation
issue
concerning
the
confrontation
of
the
American
enemy
.
You
froze
or
postponed
all
jihad
projects
and
what
is
connected
with
them
according
to
your
understanding
of
America
reality
and
the
Islamic
world
and
your
estimation
of
your
capabilities
.The
important
question
here
not
to
you
consider
the
activity
of
an
important
authority
like
the
Al-Qaeda
Network
part
from
this
reality
؟
you
observe
and
analyze
America
reality
and
the
Islamic
world,
so
you
see
that
it
is
important
an
observation
and
the
understanding
of
a
nature
and
a
curriculum
and
the
strategy
of
this
organization
it
has
been
proved
that
it
is
an
important
number
in
the
equation؟
He
said
:
we
do
not
believe
that
the
Al-Qaeda
Network
needs
a
related
observation
then
he
is
a
known
organization
by
a
known
history
by
known
targets
and
a
known
activity,
and
the
imagination
of
the
international
confrontation
remains
as
he
.
With
all
our
estimation
to
the
jihad
history
to
the
symbols
that
in
the
Al-Qaeda
confirm
that
it
but
for
the
American
reaction
is
on
the
provocations
of
the
Al-Qaeda
to
what
they
had
that
big
influence
.
Any
rash
human
can
that
provokes
America
and
from
it
the
reaction
brings
this
.
I
said
:
do
you
are
sure
that
any
rash
human
can
provokes
America
and
brings
a
terrific
reaction
like
the
one
that
happened
after
September
events
or
until
after
Kenya
and
Tanzania
؟
Alis
from
the
justice
and
the
justice
that
we
meditate
on
the
events
few
and
see
the
development
of
the
Al-Qaeda
operations
from
the
events
of
Somalia
and
Aden
to
the
explosion
of
Riyadh
and
Alkhbr
to
hitting
Kenya
and
Tanzania
to
hitting
the
USS
Cole
to
hitting
September
؟
escalating
hitting
by
growing
American
reactions,
honestly
did
you
meditate
and
studied
series
of
the
works
that
the
Al-Qaeda
executed
until
he
says
that
he
is
just
a
rash
work
؟
but
leave
me
I
am
the
most
simplicity
in
the
question,
do
a
danger
in
mind
that
the
Al-Qaeda
has
a
true
strategy
and
not
just
a
provocation
of
the
Americans؟
He
said
that
we
doubt
the
presence
of
a
strategy
by
the
true
meaning
at
the
Al-Qaeda
and
all
that
thinks
it
that
they
enjoyed
the
issue
of
America
challenge
to
what
it
brings
from
an
excitement
of
the
Islamic
emotions,
and
the
emotions
do
not
make
a
change
.
And
the
living
in
the
circumstances
of
hardness
and
intensity
of
them
is
a
taste
and
a
pleasure
impresses
some
.
I
said
:
the
generous
brother,
does
he
recognize
that
you
by
that
recognize
that
you
are
you
and
your
group
and
your
movement
you
know
only
general
impressions
about
the
rule
and
not
a
knowledge
by
its
truth
and
its
strategy
and
its
curriculum
and
its
plan؟
He
said
that
we
study
its
curriculum
and
its
strategy
an
examination,
and
it
has
explained
to
us
that
it
is
the
mobilization
of
emotions
against
America
and
crumbling
.
In
other
words
we
believe
that
there
is
no
strategy
originally
but
he
is
Hamas
an
urged
with
the
spite
against
America
agreed
with
a
love
at
the
Muslims
publics
.
I
said
:
not
to
she
believes
that
this
is
a
proof
on
your
weakness
of
you
and
not
a
proof
on
the
weakness
of
the
Al-Qaeda
؟
you
a
while
ago
it
recognized
that
it
does
not
have
a
program
and
no
a
strategic
no
a
local
and
no
an
international
and
that
you
repeat
upbringing
method
and
call
style
the
time
overused
it
.I
ask
you
a
frank
question,
did
you
think
in
your
group
or
your
movement
that
you
teach
the
Al-Qaeda
phenomenon
and
Ben
Laden
an
elaborate
study
?
or
did
you
go
to
farther
than
that
and
sent
from
your
party
delegates
that
ask
the
Al-Qaeda
about
their
curriculum؟
He
said
:
the
frank
answer
he
no
this
and
no
this,
we
did
not
teach
the
Al-Qaeda
phenomenon
an
elaborate
study
and
did
not
send
delegates
to
the
talk
with
the
Al-Qaeda
.
As
for
sending
delegates
then
an
issue
surrounded
by
the
dangers
and
as
for
the
elaborate
study
then
I
said
for
you
that
we
may
do
without
it
with
the
examination
of
the
events
.
I
said
:
with
resentment
! O
brother
is
a
group
and
a
responsible
movement
and
not
you
a
grocery
or
a
primary
school,
the
events
that
was
attributed
to
the
rule
and
the
consequences
that
events
followed
no
argues
one
of
that
it
is
graves,
do
can
one
of
that
he
claims
that
he
can
the
judgement
on
the
rule
and
its
strategy
and
did
not
present
an
elaborate
study
until
to
the
events
attributed
to
it
and
its
consequences
؟
leave
me
I
bear
the
most
clarity,
did
you
prepare
studies
or
considerations
of
the
events
of
September
and
its
consequences
in
a
totalitarian,
regardless
of
the
rule
and
its
strategy
way
?
did
you
spread
between
your
cadres
or
until
to
the
public
a
thing
from
that
؟
I
did
not
inform
and
did
not
hear
about
a
study
from
your
proverbs
about
September
events
.
Said
a
trying
the
defence
:
we
follow
up
the
events
closely
but
the
truth
that
it
no
elaborate
study
and
no
a
non
elaborate
study,
we
observe
like
other
than
us
and
read
the
newspapers
and
follow
up
the
news
and
we
have
a
general
imagination
and
were
we
and
is
still
do
not
believing
that
we
are
in
need
to
this
study
.
The
consequences
are
clear
and
does
not
need
a
search,
an
American
repression
and
an
arrogance,
the
eradication
of
a
youthful
Islamic
state
he
represented
Talban,
stuffing
the
Al-Qaeda
individuals
in
Guantanamo
cages,
the
blockade
on
the
charitable
Islamic
work
and
a
big
list
from
the
losses
is
in
the
Islamic
project
.
I
said
:
he
concerns
me
from
your
speech
of
two
points,
first
that
recognizes
clearly
totally
that
you
did
not
think
until
by
an
elaborate
study
to
the
events
of
September
and
its
consequences
besides
that
you
study
the
Al-Qaeda
phenomenon
. A
second
that
you
accept
methodically
that
you
judge
on
the
matters
without
a
methodic
study
.
By
Allah
you
should
not
you
ask
yourselves
and
you
are
groups
in
them
big
mentalities
and
the
professors
of
universities
and
intellectuals
and
intellectuals
why
do
you
accept
for
yourselves
that
you
judge
on
great
problems
by
impressions
and
sittings
opinions
like
all
of
the
peoples
?
what
is
the
group
interest
if
؟
do
I
consider
this
a
recognition
from
you
it
adds
to
your
first
recognition
that
you
do
not
have
the
methodology
of
the
interaction
with
the
events
on
the
study
way
and
the
deliberation
in
the
judgement
؟
a
wish
that
the
answer
gives
frankly
and
a
deposit
as
answered
in
the
last
time
..
He
said
: I
believe
that
I
was
honest
very
with
you
in
my
answers
and
no
a
calling
so
that
they
advise
me
on
this
way,
I
recognize
that
we
do
not
deal
with
the
methodology
of
study
and
information
and
no
the
strategic
observation
.
This
at
me
a
problem
not
recognizing
for
you
it
and
she
is
a
fault
known
in
us
we
do
not
deny
it
.
But
this
does
not
make
Ben
Laden
and
the
Al-Qaeda
on
a
right
necessarily
.Take
for
example
a
very
simple
issue,
why
Ben
Laden
monopolized
this
big
decision
and
he
is
the
confrontation
of
America؟
I
said
:
our
feeling
we
got
from
you
with
two
important
recognitions
:
the
first
she
was
less
in
it
you
not
at
you
a
politics
and
no
a
clear
political
program
and
now
it
says
that
you
do
not
depend
on
the
studies
in
the
specification
of
your
situations
.
Frankly
your
last
question
reflects
totally
this
recognition
at
you
.
But
regardless
of
being
your
request
he
reflects
your
recognition,
not
to
it
notices
that
your
question
about
Bin
Ladn
Ghareb
's
monopolization
and
you
recognize
that
the
Muslims
are
weak
and
divided
and
they
have
not
an
entity,
but
and
he
recognizes
that
you
are
kinetic
and
organizing
that
do
not
have
studies
and
no
methodology
in
the
knowledge
of
the
matters
.If
the
Muslims
state
was
with
this
badness
and
the
weakness
and
the
division
and
the
lack
of
organization
and
reference
then
who
she
is
the
authority
that
Ben
Laden
consults
and
what
he
is
the
logical
or
legitimate
justification
of
it
that
he
consults
her
؟
then
how
does
he
consult
about
a
sensitive
and
dangerous
function
as
this
a
wide
circle
like
the
Islamic
groups
headquarters
that
do
not
hold
secretely
?
and
what
he
is
the
legitimate
basis
that
obliges
it
by
it
that
he
consults؟
He
spread
an
explaining
: I
did
not
mean
that
he
consults
the
groups
or
the
kinetic
movements,
I
meant
the
confidences
.
Is
difficult
that
we
say
it
becomes
necessary
a
Sharia
that
it
consults
but
the
case
is
logically
accepted
.
And
the
absence
of
the
reference
is
right
but
at
least
he
is
familiar
with
an
opinion
who
trusts
by
it
and
the
arrival
at
it
is
possible
from
the
sheikhs
and
the
scientists
and
the
intellectuals
.
I
said
: a
good
O
Yasser
's
father
this
issue
from
two
parts
it
is
a
must
from
their
clarification,
the
first
:
who
they
are
the
consultation
people
؟
and
the
second
:
did
he
consult
Ben
Laden
or
he
did
not
spread
؟
if
is
meaning
with
your
question
for
example
why
Ben
Laden
some
specific
sheikhs
did
not
consult
about
your
mind
like
the
sheikh
Sfr
Alhoali
or
the
sheikh
Salman
the
return
then
I
will
say
for
you
these
sheikhs
are
despite
the
magnificence
of
their
position
in
the
knowledge
but
they
not
from
the
consultation
people
.
She
may
ask
me
why
؟
then
I
say
for
you
because
the
disagreement
with
them
about
the
origin,
and
he
is
the
jihad
case
itself
then
these
sheikhs
since
the
beginning
of
the
jihad
project
were
advising
the
young
man
on
the
non
departure
for
Afghanistan
since
the
jihad
days
against
the
Russians
then
how
it
assumes
from
the
sheikh
that
it
consults
them
and
their
proverbs
and
they
originally
refuse
the
principle
in
the
faculty
and
believe
in
freezing
or
the
postponement
of
the
jihad
project
.
And
as
for
the
second
part,
then
why
does
it
assume
that
it
did
not
spread
?
if
this
was
the
aim
that
has
happened
and
the
sheikh
consulted
actually
who
the
arrival
at
it
is
possible
and
trusts
its
opinion
and
its
science
.
But
until
this
if
he
did
not
do
it
then
he
is
not
on
it
a
dust
and
no
criticism
if
we
took
into
the
consideration
your
recognition
of
the
division
of
the
Islamic
work
and
the
security
blockade
on
the
scientists
and
the
preachers
and
our
agreement
on
the
absence
of
the
reference
.
And
the
sheikh
from
his
care
surprised
with
the
consultation
of
a
number
of
Almothoqin
and
intention
to
the
work
according
to
their
opinion
and
their
support
.
And
to
the
interest
circumstances
and
the
protection
of
these
names
the
sheikh
did
not
declare
them
and
no
expects
from
them
themselves
that
they
declare
that
the
sheikh
consulted
them
.
And
this
secrecy
as
long
as
an
expected
matter
then
how
it
asserts
that
the
sheikh
did
not
consult,
specially
that
you
agreed
that
you
do
not
demand
it
the
consultation
of
the
Islamic
groups
؟
and
added
to
the
completion
of
the
picture
that
this
consultation
from
the
sheikh
to
who
could
that
it
arrives
to
it
from
the
scientists
and
the
intellectuals
is
an
addition
for
its
complete
dependence
on
the
consultation
of
the
Al-Qaeda
Shura
Council
in
which
many
of
the
legitimate
and
cultural
experiences
and
the
intellectual
and
military
ones
.
And
it
appears
that
the
answer
was
sudden
to
Yasser
's
father
then
said
wondering
:
A
perfume
how
they
advise
on
it
by
such
opinion
and
has
led
the
Muslims
to
this
confrontation
that
did
not
answer
me
to
a
limit
now
about
its
destructive
monuments؟
I
said
: I
heard
from
you
a
while
ago
a
recognition
that
you
measure
the
matters
an
impressionistic
measurement
without
studies
and
no
methodology
.He
this
recognition
happened
then
does
it
agree
me
that
the
measurement
of
gains
and
losses
in
a
big
operation
like
this
it
is
built
on
a
methodic
interaction
؟
leave
us
from
your
inability
and
your
failure
as
a
group
from
that,
you
are
personally
on
the
personal
level
is
the
danger
in
your
mind
of
a
methodic
way
for
the
reformation
of
such
operation
on
the
scale
of
historical
and
political
and
strategic
?
not
to
it
agrees
with
me
that
the
assessment
needs
the
adaptation
of
the
Islamic
reality
and
the
points
of
its
weakness
and
strengthened
it,
the
adaptation
of
the
running
truth
and
its
specification
and
the
specification
of
its
weakness
points
and
strengthened
it,
the
study
of
the
event
nature
himself,
and
do
was
just
hitting
buildings
or
was
deeper
than
that
؟
was
there
are
gains
the
Arab
and
international
media
trying
their
obliteration
but
their
denial
is
not
possible
؟
or
we
originally
can
not
realization
them
because
the
field
of
our
measurement
is
related
to
the
activity
of
the
organizational
work
only
؟
did
I
return
to
the
behind
and
tried
you
are
personally
the
study
of
the
Al-Qaeda
phenomenon
and
what
wants
exactly
from
giving
America
by
this
way
and
do
to
the
Al-Qaeda
a
clear
strategy
establish
their
behaviours
on
their
basis؟
And
because
it
was
under
the
pressure
always
Yasser
's
father
has
decided
the
attack
this
time
He
said
:
why
we
try
that
we
exaggerate
the
Al-Qaeda
more
than
and
necessary
with
this
big
speech
؟
why
we
assume
that
they
have
a
strategy
and
clear
targets
and
politics
and
so
on
؟
why
it
demands
me
personally
by
all
that
until
can
I
to
it
answered
on
the
question
؟
the
gains
and
the
losses
are
in
my
view
a
clear,
I
counted
for
you
the
terrific
losses
gave
me
a
single
gain؟
I
said
:
she
mentioned
for
you
in
the
past
the
great
gain
in
ending
the
false
state
of
peace
between
the
Muslims
and
the
west
and
add
here
that
the
difference
is
between
me
and
between
you
that
I
am
not
captive
for
the
educational
kinetic
organizational
work
that
restricts
the
gains
and
the
losses
in
very
limited
cases
.
Before
I
show
for
you
the
Al-Qaeda
strategy
I
answer
you
simply
as
much
as
your
question,
did
you
manage
the
notice
of
this
terrific
Islamic
awakening
all
over
the
Islamic
world
all
in
the
identity
case
؟
a
pain
it
notices
considering
the
Muslims
of
their
identity
card
because
of
the
American
challenge
of
them
and
their
targeting
in
their
name
؟
did
you
manage
the
notice
of
the
effect
of
the
collapse
of
the
trade
towers
in
front
of
the
television
screens
and
a
repetition
that
dozens
of
times
on
the
prestige
of
America
؟
did
you
from
the
notice
that
the
Muslims
realized
manage
that
with
their
ability
without
an
advanced
weapon
and
no
atomic
bombs
that
they
do
the
deeds
in
their
opponent
only
with
the
belief
and
the
good
planning
and
the
mastery
in
the
work
؟
did
you
manage
the
notice
of
the
rise
of
the
symbolism
of
the
Al-Qaeda
and
Ben
Laden
in
all
Muslims
minds
and
their
change
to
a
true
counterpart
to
The
United
States
?
it
appeared
occurred
in
mind
that
that
developed
in
its
work
from
Somalia
and
Aden
to
Riyadh
and
Alkhbr
to
Kenya
and
Tanzania
to
hitting
the
USS
Cole
to
September
events
definitely
it
has
an
escalating
coming
step
like
the
rise
of
these
steps
؟
did
you
see
big
numbers
readiness
extent
from
the
Muslims
for
the
confrontation
of
America
and
the
quotation
in
a
battle
with
it
؟
did
you
see
the
way
of
the
Muslims
feeling
that
they
became
not
incapable
in
front
of
what
happened
in
Palestine
and
that
America
is
Ts
Yasser
's
father
said
that
this
speech
that
says
it
may
be
right
but
he
is
general
that
complicates
his
measurement
and
his
specification
as
a
specific
gain,
and
with
ability
all
claiming
that
he
claims
him
.
I
said
:
as
for
its
universe
is
a
year
and
its
measurement
and
its
specification
are
difficult
then
a
right
speech
and
not
right,
right
from
that
these
matters
their
measurement
is
not
possible
by
number
or
by
a
block
or
by
a
number
or
by
a
size
anyway,
and
not
right
from
the
non
the
possibility
of
this
change
estimation
at
all,
because
the
changes
that
pointed
to
them
all
their
estimation
are
possible
and
it
does
not
argue
about
their
occurrence
in
the
Muslim
communities
except
stubborn
.
Until
the
western
newspapers
they
confirmed
the
occurrence
of
these
matters
but
there
from
the
work
of
studies
and
statistics
approached
their
specification
a
digital
.
Yasser
's
father
said
:
our
feeling
regardless
of
these
matters
that
their
measurement
are
difficult
how
it
wants
that
it
puts
these
gains
or
the
claimed
achievements
in
the
Al-Qaeda
strategy
context
if
there
was
actually
a
strategy
to
the
Al-Qaeda؟
I
said
that
the
Al-Qaeda
put
a
clear
target
and
they
imagined
its
clear
of
its
instruments
and
its
means
and
put
a
specific
plan
in
specific
stages
and
put
politics
that
repairs
the
styles
of
its
work
.
The
Al-Qaeda
has
decided
early
that
America
is
a
problem
in
front
of
the
emergence
of
Islam
as
a
power
and
that
all
the
tyrants
of
Arabs
and
Muslims
will
be
exposed
to
the
paralysis
after
the
weakness
of
America
or
its
disintegration
.
And
therefore
was
clear
at
the
Al-Qaeda
that
its
target
is
dismantling
America
or
its
collapse
or
at
least
its
terrorism
and
its
exclusion
in
a
compulsory
way
about
the
Islamic
world
.
And
as
for
the
instruments
their
choice
has
taken
place
according
to
the
understanding
of
the
Islamic
and
international
reality
a
good
understanding
and
the
imagination
of
the
opponent
and
the
structural
holes
in
it
and
the
understanding
of
the
Al-Qaeda
of
soul
and
their
circumstances
and
the
greatest
trick
has
resorted
to
them
the
rule
she
in
the
transfer
of
the
opponent
instruments
and
its
abilities
against
it
and
especially
in
the
field
of
the
use
of
the
American
reaction
on
the
provocations
of
the
Al-Qaeda
in
the
mobilization
of
the
Muslims
against
America
and
their
recruitment
with
the
Al-Qaeda
.
And
as
for
the
plan
has
put
the
matter
settlement
issue
with
America
as
the
last
stage
it
preceded
it
the
presence
verification
stage
in
the
statement
of
bringing
the
crusade
forces
from
the
Arabian
Peninsula
then
the
Americans
excitement
stage
the
term
of
their
operating
public
relations
instrument
for
the
mobilization
of
the
people
against
America
from
and
the
recruitment
of
the
cadres
with
the
Al-Qaeda
directly
on
the
other
side
then
the
settlement
stage
and
she
is
the
hitting
stage
inside
America
and
that
started
with
the
battle
of
September
and
it
is
assumed
that
hitting
the
suffix
of
the
American
psychology
crash
follow
it
from
it
the
country
collapses
.
And
the
Al-Qaeda
benefitted
from
the
circumstances
of
Afghanistan
and
the
protection
of
the
Taliban
a
maximum
benefiting
and
trained
thousands
of
cadres
in
the
jihad
.
As
for
the
politics
then
the
rule
is
clear
totally
that
they
are
committed
to
the
jihad
Salafi
Islam
and
not
at
them
half
solutions
and
no
pragmatism,
and
she
is
clear
that
they
concentrate
on
the
target
only
and
does
not
busy
herself
by
other
matters,
and
a
clear
that
they
do
not
enter
disagreements
and
no
disputes
with
other
Islamic
and
clear
powers
that
they
stick
to
their
plan
and
they
are
not
enticed
to
reactions
.
This
is
not
except
summarizing
the
Al-Qaeda
strategy
or
if
we
wanted
the
writing
in
this
subject
in
detail
to
what
books
embraced
but
it
will
find
a
rich
in
an
article
(
the
jihad
is
a
genius
and
an
inspiration
..The
Al-Qaeda
a
model
)
He
spread
a
sarcastic
!:
as
if
you
speak
about
a
greater
organization
from
the
countries
while
we
see
only
a
hidden
group
behind
the
mountains
that
do
not
have
a
thing
mentions
then
how
does
it
give
it
this
great
description
?
the
present
Islamic
groups
are
despite
its
penetrations
of
the
educational
and
economic
enterprises
but
and
until
the
military
is
impossible
that
it
approaches
for
this
description
that
described
it,
not
to
it
sees
that
you
exaggerate؟
I
said
:
this
your
problem,
you
judge
on
the
world
throughout
your
hard
kinetic
experience
the
complicated
bureaucracy
is
organically
and
therefore
the
understanding
of
the
way
by
which
the
Al-Qaeda
could
that
it
produces
a
great
work
is
difficult
for
you
.
Your
experience
transfers
in
it
the
organization
to
hindrance
instrument
instead
of
that
it
is
coordination
instrument
and
an
arrangement
and
an
integration
and
a
maturation
and
a
making
a
success
.
The
Al-Qaeda
solved
this
problem
an
easy
solution
by
two
tricks,
the
first
is
that
it
canceled
the
idea
of
the
hierarchical
organization
and
the
organizational
connection
in
a
single
structure
and
caused
its
place
the
university
idea
or
the
faculty
that
educate
the
cadres
and
hence
it
launches
these
cadres
so
that
she
works
at
a
like
plan
advertiser
and
makes
abilities
and
the
Al-Qaeda
relations
under
its
handling,
the
second
that
it
got
rid
of
a
problem
that
the
belonging
means
the
isolation
from
the
society
and
it
trained
its
cadres
in
the
integration
into
the
societies
and
made
its
declared
program
part
of
the
aspiration
of
the
society
and
hence
it
transferred
the
society
nature
and
a
lot
of
its
abilities
spontaneously
to
the
service
of
its
targets
.
These
advantages
do
not
need
a
genius
for
the
explanation
in
their
execution,
all
that
needs
it
is
the
understanding
of
the
idea
origin
.
Your
organizations
of
the
generous
brother
changed
the
idea
and
made
the
organization
a
reason
in
freezing
the
cadres
and
the
hindrance
of
the
abilities
and
the
Islamic
efficiencies
belonging
to
you
.
You
did
not
launch
these
efficiencies
so
that
they
handle
with
freedom
and
did
not
provide
for
them
the
integrated
program
built
on
a
clear
strategy
.
Does
she
know
brother
how
does
the
Al-Qaeda
choose
the
commands
?
they
not
they
your
example
they
choose
the
most
(
an
obedience
and
a
discipline
)
to
who
they
are
over
them
from
kinetic
commands,
they
choose
their
commands
according
to
their
behaviours
in
the
true
battles
because
the
human
in
the
battle
time
becomes
false
from
himself
inclined
the
world
and
brings
a
better
what
he
have
if
was
who
wants
Allah
and
the
afterworld
..
And
your
worse
problem
is
that
you
reform
the
other
according
to
your
backward
organizational
experience
.
The
generous
brother
did
I
yourself
ask
how
did
the
Al-Qaeda
could
development
until
it
arrived
to
the
execution
of
this
complicated
operation
in
America
heart
with
each
mastery
and
accuracy
?
he
noticed
that
the
rule
is
besieged
and
lives
under
an
international
conspiracy,
and
is
not
free
and
free
like
most
of
your
organizations
.
Yasser
's
father
said
and
as
if
the
previous
speech
all
did
not
make
a
thing
with
him
:
with
my
respect
of
the
strategy
that
presents
it
and
attributes
it
to
the
Al-Qaeda
does
the
base
believe
or
its
leaders
that
the
nation
is
ready
in
the
backward
its
present
weak
situation
with
respect
to
the
power
and
the
development
and
overtaking
the
civilization
procession
in
a
situation
that
enables
it
the
confrontation
of
the
big
opponents
of
the
Islam
and
specially
America
؟
Alis
from
the
worthiest
that
we
exercise
the
educational
and
development
jihad
Waltoawy
is
till
that
we
arrive
to
the
situation
that
enables
us
raising
the
jihad
flag
frank
and
high؟
I
said
:
and
the
boredom
of
its
speech
has
possessed
me
:
who
prevented
you
that
it
exercises
the
educational
jihad
Waltoawy
and
the
development
one
؟
it
continued
in
the
exercise
of
your
jihad
but
no
Tthrb
on
the
one(s)
who
exercises
a
true
jihad
and
is
not
figuratively
.
He
said
:
defending
its
opinion
: I
am
no
Athrb
a
misuse,
I
say
the
nation
not
prepared
and
therefore,
its
pull
is
to
the
confrontation
state
without
that
it
is
in
a
state
of
alert
and
a
preparation
and
you
prepared
for
them
what
could
from
a
power
confuses
the
nation
all
and
spoils
the
other
jihad
kinds
that
named
it
a
figurative
.
I
said
:
first
the
generous
brother
the
verse
said
what
could
and
he
did
not
oblige
by
a
specific
level
from
the
enabling
and
the
power
then
hope
that
no
he
meant
citing
it
a
Sharia
because
he
citing
it
is
not
correct
by
that
way
.A
second
what
he
is
legal
evidence
or
the
logical
one
that
the
Muslims
are
committed
that
they
get
ready
by
a
specific
level
before
they
face
their
opponents
and
exercise
the
fight
؟
the
legal
evidence
not
on
the
reverse
؟
the
Muslims
scholars
not
agreeing
on
the
necessity
of
Alsael
incitement
an
instant
necessity
؟
Alis
is
what
America
exercises
in
the
stabilization
of
its
armies
in
the
two
Holy
Mosques
countries
and
the
support
of
the
Jews
in
Palestine
and
the
confirmation
of
agents
from
the
Muslims
tyrants
it
enables
its
air-conditioning
of
Balsael
that
annuls
its
payment
immediately
by
any
means
؟
but
until
logically
what
she
is
the
readiness
that
want
them
until
the
Muslims
in
a
situation
were
can
in
it
confrontation
a
superpower
like
America؟
He
said
:
they
establish
a
country
represented,
the
Taliban
country
represented,
it
develops
and
it
becomes
an
international
power,
or
cause
a
change
in
one
of
the
Muslims
countries
in
favour
of
the
Islam,
but
will
not
be
in
need
to
the
confrontation
of
America
soldier
if
that
happened
because
they
can
for
me
an
economic
America
arm
or
politically
or
until
with
the
call
inside
America
.
The
important
that
the
Muslims
become
strong
culturally
before
they
enter
in
like
this
dangerous
confrontation
.
I
said
:
if
was
I
the
generous
brother
he
speaks
from
an
ignorance
and
the
non
follow-up
and
no
knowledge
by
the
international
politics
and
the
new
localism
and
about
the
non
follow-up
for
the
activity
of
the
Al-Qaeda
we
excused
you
in
your
speech
this,
but
me
I
assert
that
you
on
a
complete
knowledge
that
America
and
their
allies
will
not
allow
at
all
he
is
not
in
an
Islamic
state
but
until
with
the
prominence
of
an
Islamic
power
inside
any
country
and
their
politics
known
that
they
will
suppress
any
power
before
he
appears
.
Then
does
she
be
ignorant
the
experience
of
the
Islamic
movements
through
the
last
fifty
years
?
does
it
be
ignorant
what
happened
in
Sudan
and
Algeria
and
Turkey
and
Egypt
؟
so
it
sees
that
the
exclusion
of
the
jihad
strengthens
the
Islam
enemies
scale
because
the
money
and
the
media
and
the
tyranny
is
by
their
hand
؟
so
the
experience
of
the
last
years
suffices
for
the
refutation
of
your
argument
and
the
confirmation
of
the
failure
of
the
political
Islam
project
from
which
the
jihads
are
excluded
؟
then
you
have
a
problem
in
the
understanding
of
a
mechanism
that
represents
the
power
..
القوى
يا
عزيزي
تتشكل
من
خلال
طريقتين
الأولى:
الحرب
وعندما
تنتصر
في
الحرب
تمتلك
قوة
والمنتصرون
في
الحرب
العالمية
الثانية
هم
الذين
أصبحوا
يملكون
القوة،
والثانية
أن
يتبرع
لك
قوي
بقوة
من
عنده
وبهذه
الطريقة
ستبقى
قوتك
مرتبطة
بالقوي
الذي
تبرع
لك
بتلك
القوة
بسبب
مصالحه،
وقد
علمنا
يقينا
أن
الغرب
لا
يسمح
أبدا
بتشكل
قوة
إسلامية
ليست
تحت
سمعه
وبصره
أعني
بحيث
يديرها
عملاؤه.
فقال:
لكن
الوقت
جزء
من
الحل
ولا
بد
من
الصبر،
وإذا
لم
تنجح
المسالة
في
الخمسين
سنة
الماضية
فيجب
علينا
أن
لا
نمل
ولا
نكل
ونستمر
نحاول.
لكن
قل
لي
كيف
تريد
للقاعدة
أن
تواجه
بدون
دولة
وبدون
مقدرات
مع
عدو
متمكن
وقوي
ونفوذه
ممتد
في
كل
العالم؟
فقلت
كيف
تفكر
يا
أبا
ياسر؟
يا
أخي
أولا
ثبت
أن
القاعدة
نجحت،
وضربت
وضربت
وكررت
الضربة
وهي
التي
تبادر
والأمريكان
عليهم
رد
الفعل
ولم
تتأثر
كوادرها
بل
تضخمت
وكبرت.
هذا
الكلام
لا
يحتاج
إثبات
لأنه
أمر
حدث
فعلا
ويمكننا
رصد
التطور
كما
ذكرت
لك
في
ردي
السابق.
ثانيا
المشكلة
التي
تعاني
منها
أنت
وتيارك
هي
ذات
المشكلة
التي
تخلصت
منها
القاعدة
وقلبت
الموزاين
وأربكت
أمريكا
وهي
كونك
تقيس
وتفكر
من
خلال
النمط
الدارج
في
فهم
القوة
العسكرية
والسياسية
والاستراتيجية.
القاعدة
لعبت
لعبة
جديدة
تماما
خارجة
عن
كل
قواعد
اللعب
المعروفة
ولا
يستطيع
الأمريكان
ولا
غيرهم
تصورها
لأنهم
مثلك
مبرمجون
على
الأسلوب
التقليدي
في
حسابات
القوة
والضعف.
ومن
خلال
هذه
الحيلة
حولت
القاعدة
قوة
الأمريكان
إلى
أداة
ضعف
تعمل
ضدهم،
ومن
هنا
أصبحت
القاعدة
تتضخم
وتزداد
قوتها
بعد
كل
ردة
فعل
أمريكية.
وأما
مسألة
تشكيل
القاعدة
لدولة
فثق
تماما
أن
القاعدة
تسير
في
الطريق
الطبيعي
لإنشاء
الدول
ولابد
أن
تلاحظ
أن
مصير
أمريكا
الان
على
كف
عفريت
وانتظار
الضربة
التالية،
وإذا
لم
تستطع
أمريكا
الحسم
بعد
مرور
سنة
فيجب
أن
يكون
ذهنك
متفتحا
بشكل
واسع
لتقبل
فكرة
انهيار
أمريكا
إذا
عاجلتها
القاعدة
بضربات
جديدة
..
وإذا
انهارت
أمريكا
فهل
لديك
قدرة
على
تصور
كيف
سيكون
وضع
أحجار
الشطرنج
التي
وضعها
الغرب
في
بلاد
المسلمين؟
أظنك
لست
محتاجا
لمزيد
من
التفصيل
أليس
كذلك
؟
فقال:
أنت
لا
تفتأ
تضخم
القاعدة
وكأنها
قوة
ملهمة
عبقرية
لا
تخطئ.
إلى
متى
نستمر
في
هذه
المبالغات
والتغني
بقدرات
القاعدة.
فقلت
:
أولا
أنا
لم
أبالغ
ولم
أتغنى،
كل
ما
قلته
حصل
ولا
تستطيع
أنت
ولا
غيرك
نفي
أن
القاعدة
بعد
كل
ردة
فعل
أمريكية
وتواطؤ
عالمي
ضدها
تأتي
بضربة
أكبر
وأضخم
من
الأولى
وتحظى
بتأييد
أوسع
وأشمل
من
السابق.
ثانيا
الحديث
عن
قدرة
القاعدة
على
التعامل
مع
أمريكا
بأسلوب
لا
تحسن
أمريكا
التعامل
معه
ليس
كلامي
أنا
بل
هو
كلام
استراتيجيين
أمريكان
أطلقوا
على
هذا
التعبير
الحرب
غير
المتوازية.
وقالوا
إن
أمريكا
لن
تعجزها
أي
قوة
في
الأرض
بالمقاييس
المعروفة
فقد
تمكنت
أمريكا
عسكريا
واقتصاديا
وسياسيا
واستخباراتيا
وإعلاميا
بل
وحتى
في
فنون
الحرب
النفسية
لكنها
لا
تحسن
التعامل
مع
من
يستخدم
وسائل
وأساليب
غير
معروفة
للتجربة
الأمريكية.
وأطلقوا
على
هذا
النوع
من
الحرب
إسم
الحرب
غير
المتوازية.
وقالو
في
تقرير
خاص
إن
هذه
الحرب
إذا
لم
يتمكنوا
من
احتوائها
في
الضربة
الأولى
فستكون
هناك
نذر
انكشاف
في
القوة
الأمريكية
واحتمال
خسارة
حقيقية
لأمريكا
في
هذه
الحرب.
صدقني
هذا
كلام
حقيقي
في
تقرير
رفع
للرئيس
الأمريكي
كلينتون
قبل
أن
ينصرف
من
الرئاسة
وليس
كلامي
أنا.
أسلوب
وسياسية
واستراتيجية
القاعدة
تنطبق
تماما
على
هذا
التوقع
ومن
هنا
نقول
لك
أن
هذا
هو
الإعداد
والقوة.
زم
أبو
ياسر
شفتيه
وقال
..
الغلو
يا
أخي
الكريم
وعين
الرضا
تجعلك
تتحدث
عن
القاعدة
بهذا
الشكل
..
بل
وصل
الأمر
ببعض
الناس
في
الانترنت
أن
صاروا
يشنعون
على
أهل
العلم
ويتهمونهم
في
نياتهم
ويصفونهم
بالأوصاف
البشعة
كل
ذلك
بسبب
الغلو
في
القاعدة
وبن
لادن..
فقلت
:
مثل
من
يا
أبا
ياسر
؟
فقال
:
مثل
شخص
في
الانترنت
يرمز
لاسمه
بـ
(
لويس
عطية
الله
)
بلغ
به
الحد
أن
كتب
موضوعا
يقول
فيه
(
أسامة
بن
لادن
صلى
الله
عليه
وسلم
)
..
وطالب
الناس
أن
يغسلوا
أيديهم
من
شيوخ
الصحوة
،
وكأنه
يريد
إسقاطهم
!
حسنا
إذا
غسلنا
أيدينا
من
هؤلاء
الشيوخ
الذين
قدموا
للدعوة
ما
قدموا
وسجنوا
في
الله
سنوات
فلمن
نذهب
؟
والمشكلة
أن
لديه
من
يطبل
له
ويصفق
له
!
ابتسمت
ابتسامة
عريضة
وقلت
له
:
أنا
لويس
عطية
الله
!!
علت
ملامح
الدهشة
وجه
أبي
ياسر
ولم
ينطق
بكلمة
..
فقلت:
نعم
أنا
لويس
عطية
الله
ويبدو
أنك
لا
تقرأ
لي
جيدا
وإلا
ما
قلت
ما
قلت
من
كلام
،
فأنا
لم
أقل
(صلى
الله
عليه
وسلم)
بل
قلت
(صلى
الله
على
أسامة
بن
لادن)
وأنت
يا
أباياسر
عربي
وتفرق
بين
الجملتين
فالأولى
قد
عرفت
بين
أهل
العلم
كلفظ
ملاصق
لذكر
النبي
صلى
الله
عليه
وسلم
والثانية
دعاء
عادي
يصح
أن
تقوله
في
حق
أي
مسلم!
وأما
مسألة
غسل
اليدين
من
شيوخ
الصحوة
فهذا
مقتضى
ما
علمونا
هم،
فهؤلاء
الشيوخ
قد
تنكبوا
طريق
الحق
الذي
أخذناه
منهم
سنوات
طويلة
فإذا
حادوا
عن
المنهج
الذي
ربونا
عليه
فلا
خير
فينا
إذا
لم
نقل
في
وجوههم
ارجعوا
إلى
الحق،
وأما
مسألة
إسقاطهم
فهذه
لا
يقوله
سوى
من
لديه
خوف
داخلي
من
خطأ
يدرك
أنه
واقع
فيه،
ومن
أنا
حتى
أسقط
هؤلاء
الشيوخ؟
وإذا
سقطوا
فلن
يسقطوا
بسبب
كلامي
بل
لأن
الله
تعالى
قال
لنا
(
وإن
تتولوا
يستبدل
قوما
غيركم
ثم
لا
يكونوا
أمثالكم
)
..
سكت
أبو
ياسر
ثم
قال
لي
وأثر
الصدمة
بادية
على
وجهه
:
كيف
تثبت
لي
أنك
فعلا
لويس
عطية
الله
؟
فقلت
:
حسنا
هذه
المناظرة
سوف
أكتبها
باسم
لويس
وستراها
بنفسك
وتتأكد
أن
من
كان
يتحدث
معك
هو
لويس
عطية
الله
.
ثم
سكتّ
برهة
وقلت:
حسنا
دعنا
نتوقف
الان
عن
الحديث
عني
ولنكمل
حديثنا
عن
القاعدة
..
ما
رأيك
في
آخر
كلام
قلته
؟
فقال
أبو
ياسر:
كلامك
الأخير
يعني
أن
القاعدة
لديها
خطط
مستقبلة
أخرى
وربما
ضربات
في
داخل
أمريكا،
إذا
كان
زعمك
بوجود
استراتيجية
صحيحا
فهل
خططت
القاعدة
لطريقة
ضبط
الخطوات
القادمة
أو
إنها
فقط
مسكونة
بفكرة
ضرب
أمريكا
ودفعها
للغضب
والانتقام
من
جديد؟
ألا
تعتقد
أن
القاعدة
إذا
كانت
فعلا
مستعدة
بضربات
أخرى
أو
برامج
أخرى
أنها
ستدفع
الأمريكان
لحملات
انتقام
من
المسلمين
ربما
يستخدم
فيها
السلاح
النووي
أو
غيره؟
فقلت
:
أمريكا
تنتقم
ممّن؟
أين
تضع
قنبلتها
النووية؟
الطالبان
فيما
يبدو
للأمريكان
انتهوا،
بن
لادن
والقاعدة
اختفوا،
أين
توضع
هذه
القنبلة؟
كيف
تنتقم
أمريكا؟
كل
بلاد
العالم
متواطئة
ومتعاونة
معها،
أين
تنتقم؟
كابل؟
قندهار؟
كلها
معاقل
للجيش
الأمريكي
وحلفائه
الآن؟
قال
:
في
أي
مدينة
إسلامية
في
بريدة
في
كراتشي،
الأمريكان
سيفقدون
صوابهم
بالكامل
ويفكرون
بطيش
وجنون.
قلت:
في
البدء
أنت
جعلتَ
أمريكا
من
أكثر
دول
العالم
قدرة
وتخطيطا
وهيمنة،
والآن
تقول
يفقدون
صوابهم؟
ماذا
سيجنون
إن
ضربوا
مدينة
إسلامية
وبس؟
هل
سيقضون
على
القاعدة
وخطر
القاعدة؟
يعني
على
الأقل
في
حملتهم
الأخيرة
رغم
أنها
في
الجملة
ليست
في
صالحهم
لكن
لها
مبرر
منطقي
أنها
قضاء
على
الدولة
التي
تؤويهم
ومطاردتهم
داخل
أفغانستان.
إما
أن
تعتبر
الأمريكان
أذكياء
متمكنين
قادرين
كما
وصفتهم
أعلاه
وبذلك
لن
يتصرفوا
تصرفا
أرعن
وجنوني
مثل
ضرب
مدينة
إسلامية،
أو
تتراجع
عن
كلامك
أعلاه
وتقول
الأمريكان
حفنة
مجانين
لا
يعرفون
السياسة
ولا
الاستراتيجية
فقال:
قل
لي
أنت
إذا
ما
الذي
تعتقد
إذاً
سيحصل
لو
حصلت
ضربة
أخرى؟
وهل
الضربة
الأخرى
فعلا
هي
من
برنامج
القاعدة؟
أو
دعنا
نكون
أكثر
نظاما
في
السؤال
ما
هي
خطط
القاعدة
المستقبلية؟
وكيف
حسبتها
على
أساس
ردود
الفعل
الأمريكية؟
ضحكت
وقلت:
أنا
لا
أستطيع
أن
أتحدث
باسم
القاعدة
وأنبيء
بخططها
المستقبلية
لكن
هناك
كلام
شبه
أكيد
عن
ضربة
كبيرة
قادمة
لأمريكا
وربما
أكبر
من
ضربة،
وربما
هناك
عمليات
في
مناطق
أخرى
غير
أمريكا.
لكن
القاعدة
يبدو
لا
ترغب
أن
تعمل
شيئا
كبيرا
إلى
أن
تظهر
علامات
تفكك
وانهيار
وهزيمة
في
أمريكا.
في
نظري
ستشعر
أمريكا
بشلل
كامل
لو
حصلت
ضربة
أخرى
وسيصاب
الشعب
الأمريكي
بحالة
من
الإحباط
الوطني
الذي
يشعرهم
بأنهم
مهزومون
وأن
هذا
العدو
لا
يصلح
مواجهته
بالقوة
بل
لا
بد
من
الخضوع
لمطالبه.
سيناريو
آخر
هو
أن
تبدأ
جهات
أمريكية
بالتضايق
من
سياسة
واشنطن
وترفض
تحمل
تبعات
تصرفات
الحكومة
ضد
المسلمين.
خذ
مثلا
كاليفورنيا
تنتج
ثلث
الناتج
القومي
لأمريكا،
لماذا
تتحمل
تبعات
التصرفات
السيئة
لواشنطن
في
العالم
الإسلامي؟
لن
نستغرب
إذا
رأينا
دعوات
في
كاليفورنيا
بالانفصال
أو
حتى
من
جهات
أخرى.
سيناريو
آخر
أن
يتشدد
دعاة
اليمين
في
أمريكا
للتخلي
عن
الحريات
والديموقراطية
وتحويل
ولاياتهم
إلى
ولايات
عسكرية
بحكم
صارم
لا
يسمح
باختراقات
أمنية.
أمريكا
سيسودها
قطعا
حالة
من
الانهيار
النفسي
والاقتصادي
والشك
بذاتها.
أوربا
والجهات
الداعمة
لأمريكا
ستنسحب
خوفا
من
أن
تصبح
هدف
القاعدة
القادم.
الانظمة
الطاغوتية
في
البلاد
الإسلامية
ستكون
في
أضعف
ما
يمكن
بسبب
ضعف
السيد
الأول.
فقال
:
سبحان
الله
تصرون
على
تضخيم
نتائج
ما
تقوم
به
القاعدة
ونحن
نرى
أمريكا
امتصّت
ما
حصل
في
سبتمبر
وكأن
شيئا
لم
يكن
..
ثم
ضحك
ابو
ياسر
وأردف:
كيف
لا
تستطيع
أن
تتحدث
باسم
القاعدة
وأنت
(صجّيتنا)
كل
يوم
منزل
مقال
عن
القاعدة؟
ابتسمت
وقلت:
كيف
كأن
شيئا
لم
يكن؟
هل
أذنك
في
صمم
وعينك
في
عمى
عما
حصل
للاقتصاد
الأمريكي؟
ألا
ترى
حالة
الشك
والترقب
عند
الأمريكان
والتي
تسكتها
الحكومة
بالمزايدة
على
محاربة
الإرهاب؟
أليست
هذه
مقدمات
واضحة
لاستقطاب
كبير
في
المجتمع
الأمريكي
يخفيه
مكارثية
محاربة
الإرهاب؟
فقال
:
أنا
لا
أريد
أن
أظهر
بمظهر
الذي
يدافع
عن
أمريكا
لكن
أمريكا
مجتمع
ديموقراطي
لديه
مؤسسات
راسخة
تستطيع
أن
تتعامل
مع
تحديات
من
أي
نوع
لأن
العقلية
الجماعية
عندهم
منظمة
وتنظر
للأمور
نظرا
علميا
مدروسا
ولا
نظن
أنهم
سيصعب
عليهم
الصحوة
بعد
أي
هجوم.
فقلت
:
والله
شوف،
أصلا
لم
يحطم
الأمريكان
في
تعاملهم
مع
بن
لادن
إلا
أنهم
تُشل
عندهم
القدرة
على
التفكير
الجماعي
إذا
استفزوا
بالطريقة
التي
يمارسها
تنظيم
القاعدة.
لكن
حتى
لو
افترضنا
وحصل
أن
عادوا
إلى
رشدهم
فلن
يكون
لديهم
خيار
إلا
التسليم
وتنفيذ
كل
مطالب
بن
لادن
بطريقة
الخائب
الضعيف.
إيقاف
دعم
إسرائيل
رفع
الحصار
عن
العراق
سحب
قواتهم
من
بلاد
الحرمين
و
التخلي
عن
الطواغيت
العرب.
ألا
ترى
هذا
نصرا
عظيما
للقاعدة؟
قال
أبو
ياسر
:
ومن
منا
يكره
هزيمة
أمريكا
؟
يارب
..
فقلت:
يارب
..
انتهى
الحوار
بهذه
الطريقة
..
ثم
ابتسم
أبو
ياسر
وقال
لي
مثل
المتعجب:
بالله
أنت
لويس
عطية
الله
؟
فضحك&# |
