Jill St. Claire's HomelandSecurityUS.NET

The devil target

2-26-2005

 

We say in the name of Allah and by it we seek help


And what after the examination officially about the non presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq ؟


The countries of the first world as America and Britain and by all what they possess from a long political history and accumulated diplomatic experiences and deliberate accurate studies of all decisive and important steps on the political level with the relation, then do from the reasonable to two countries like Britain and America the adoption of their strategy on information not a minute from weak sources ؟ .


This in the truth is not except false and cheap arguments, then countries by this advanced level as it claims and inspires us that does not depend only on non accurate information in the achievement of the targets, and on its basis in it dangerous steps are made they come to the wars, and sensitive decisions in rooms the biggest centers of the studies specialized in the political thought, and Amalqa the future studies .

But the truth .. The decision of Iraq invasion in particular was as a result to a studied British American strategy a prepared in advance and a big Middle Eastern project it prepared and facilitated to it sometime ago that is not short but until the saying is possible a decision by this level is not from Bush 's government authorities or Blair the manipulation easily and therefore of it, the claim of the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or its non presence it does not represent a true problem on the decision of the war, and she does not prepare the last reports that were issued finally about the completion of the search for the weapons of mass destruction and the statements by the non finding of germ weapons in Iraq she does not consider which affects strategically ( from the American angle ) on a decision or the war results, but the presence of weapons of mass destruction or its non presence may affect a legitimate justification of that war, but its presence may contribute in the polish of the deformed American picture in the international relations .

As for if the submitted signs were from the American alliance with the possession of Iraq weapons of mass destruction she the true motive behind the war was the worthiest in The United States Of America and Britain and some organizing countries therefore the alliance that they start by more nuclear files a seriousness from Iraq and declared to a great extent as the Korean or Pakistani file or the Iranian one or . And so on, but until what was declared it from other reasons they were driven as a justification to the invasion and that says ( by that the previous regime he by a fascist dictatorial regime ), it and despite a correctness what was pointed to it but Britain for example a tyranny does not concern her from this kind, as long as it was away from the influence on the British interests in the world, and there countries they were still till this moment as Israel exercising the longest kinds of the invasion on the countries and the ugliest and the most destructive kinds of the terrorism on the nations of those colonies recently and the countries nations near to them is exercised, and their prisons full of the innocents from children and women and an inability, and there are no they or not can more accurately who demands the war on them .

As for the belief that the war was to intelligence justifications only then he is a sarcastic belief and for the pity and therefore the reports that are issued from time to time, concerning the manipulation of the intelligence information do not form a big importance by the ratio of the strategic dimension of the British and American policies that will continue in next stage in the same trend even if that led to the fall of Bush 's government or Blair .

And here a true standing should be for the clarification of the political view from the Iraqi angle ( in my personal viewpoint definitely ) around the war legitimacy circumstances regardless of the American and international agenda, then majority of the sects the supporting Al Rafdia and the supported one from Iran in Iraq was looking at the war that they are wealth start and not a frightening nightmare, and this a departure is not from the easiness their assimilation originally, but who the Iraqi reality lived in the time of the previous government he alone who can assimilate that feeling, and this picture as such reflects the depth of the tragedy that the Iraqi state reached now in general .

And therefore, the war was the lesser evil at that sect Al Rafdia and especially in the south in the cities of association of partners and deviation ( the dirtier city and the more astray Najaf ) . Which means tentatively the non presence of rejecters veto ( and is not an Iraqi ) against the invasion with all expected losses .

And thereupon .. , this view was also a mixed with the caution towards the American targets in Iraq . And therefore, the treatment of the American presence is in Iraq a thing, and the war on Saddam is another thing totally, by a meaning that the majority of national Iraqis are not convinced of the war justifications on the previous government, but is not from their priorities Saddam 's departure and the search for an alternative command but that they now want the search for the most useful ways the occasion for the interaction with American state invading them in Iraq and from those means for the treatment of this situation not necessarily that she is according to the desire of the Americans and their agents in the governing council and a rejecting is Iraq in the farce and the named one the elections but on the weapon carrying way and the resistance of the invading occupier and who supported them from the parasites .




And the penalty of Allah the Lord of the Worlds

 

 


 HOME 

 ©2003-2008 All Rights Reserved Jill St. Clare's HomelandSecurityUS.NET