|
|
Iran will possess the atomic bomb ..And you will remember what say is for you8-24-2005
The
cat
and
mouse
drama
between
Iran
and
the
west
became
exposed
..
Iran
started
its
nuclear
project
since
long
..
And
the
West
watches
..
And
when
the
fruits
picking
time
came
for
Iran
the
West
started
shouting
and
laments
..
And
they
(
any
of
the
wests
)
know
well
that
they
do
that
during
the
extra
time
..
And
Iran
has
accomplished
a
big
round
in
its
nuclear
project
..
Some
of
the
news
say
that
Iran
will
possess
the
nuclear
in
2005
whereas
some
of
them
were
saying
in
2007
!! What
means
that
..And
why
the
West
became
silent
about
Iran
without
serious
steps
for
its
prevention
from
the
nuclear
possession؟؟
First
)
the
possession
of
Iran
(
the
Shiite
Persian
)
of
a
very
useful
nuclear
weapon
to
America
and
the
West
..
He
is
a
very
strong
justification
for
a
huge
military
American
presence
continuation
in
the
region
and
especially
in
Iraq
and
the
Gulf
for
protection
of
the
Arabs
from
the
strong
domineering
neighbour
..
With
the
knowledge
that
Iran
she
greater
than
America
wrist
in
its
war
against
Saddam
but
it
continues
the
representation
of
turn
hostile
to
America
Bbgaha
..
And
this
is
comic
actually
..
Since
but
for
Iran
not
America
could
execute
its
plans
in
Afghanistan
and
Iraq
..(
a
returning
is
Abthi's
statements
and
he
boasts
of
that
) A
second
)
as
mentioned
in
previous
topics
..
America
wishes
and
the
region
Lshiea
seeks
..
She
was
behind
the
fall
of
the
Shah
(
secular
)
and
Khomeini's
arrival
(
the
radical
)
..
And
she
was
behind
Saddam's
fall
(
the
Baathist
)
and
the
arrival
of
Al-Jaafari's
government
(
the
disguised
Al
Raekalia
)
..
And
she
is
behind
the
dismissal
of
the
Palestinian
organizations
from
south
of
Lebanon
and
the
replacement
of
the
collaborating
Hezbollah
their
place
..
She
may
seek
the
Shiites's
undertaking
of
the
rule
in
Bahrain
..Or
the
withdrawal
of
the
eastern
region
in
Saudi
Arabia
( a
returning
is
Katnga
plan
that
appeared
in
the
seventies
and
that
was
ordering
that
it
is
the
state
of
change
occurrence
in
the
regime
in
Saudi
Arabia,
on
The
United
States
that
it
encourages
the
separation
of
the
eastern
region
where
the
oil
fields
and
its
putting
under
the
American
protection
) A
third
)
return
to
juveniles
the
25
last
year
..
And
yourself
asks
:
did
America
or
the
west
have
any
attempted
of
dropping
the
Mollah
regime
in
Iran
?
at
all
..
And
no
a
single
attempt
..
But
look
when
Sudan
tried
the
application
of
Sharia
.
What
happened
..
She
launched
a
complete
war
(
in
the
agency
)
and
any
of
Sudan
neighbours
prevented
from
its
aid
..
America
does
not
object
from
the
emergence
of
a
Shiite
fundamentalist
country
..
But
she
objects
from
the
emergence
of
a
fundamentalist
Sunni
country
!!!
And
the
reason
is
very
clear
then
she
knows
where
is
the
true
danger
to
it
..
And
from
a
precedence
and
read
about
the
cooperation
of
Safawi
Iran
with
Germany
against
the
Ottoman
Empire
that
explains
to
Iran
relation
the
West
..
She
is
the
dagger
in
the
country
flank
Al
Islamsa
..
The
West
exploits
the
expansionist
inclination
the
Shiite
persian
for
making
a
balance
against
the
jihad
age
extension
(
and
if
possible
that
it
says
the
Arab
then
no
hindrance
)
.. A
fourth
)
Iran
(
one
of
the
axis
of
evil
members
)
excels
in
the
representation
of
the
houses
of
the
first
enemy
of
America
(
the
greatest
devil
)
and
she
(
any
Iran
)
always
succeeds
in
the
evasion
from
the
American
trap
(
because
of
the
wisdom
of
its
referees
and
their
intelligence
!!)
..
Then
we
are
surprised
that
all
of
the
matters
walk
in
favour
of
Iran
!!
America
grants
entry
visa
Ngadi
for
the
attendance
of
the
United
Nations
session
!!
(
while
she
was
can
preventing
it
as
did
with
many
of
the
presidents
as
Arafat
for
example
)
..
Iran
exports
its
oil
with
each
freedom
(
while
it
can
prevent
it
as
did
with
Iraq
Saddam
except
versus
the
food
!!
)
..
Iran
imports
any
commodity
that
it
wants
..
And
the
International
Organization
seals
of
the
nuclear
energy
free
from
their
reactor
in
Isfahan
..
And
no
can
one
of
that
he
talks
to
it
!!!
Any
enemy
this
؟
..
A
saying
may
say
it
takes
its
power
from
China
or
Russia
...
I
say
:
if
to
these
he
weighed
in
front
of
the
whole
world
Saddam
succeeded
in
all
its
plans
..
The
imagination
that
in
the
year
of
2000
offered
Bill
Clinton
a
big
presentation
of
the
Islamic
Republic,
and
his
according
The
United
States
in
Iran
as
being
a
main
local
power
in
the
Middle
East
against
the
change
of
Iran
of
its
behaviour
recognizes
!!!
A
fifth
)
the
possession
of
Iran
of
the
nuclear
weapon
will
make
America
respect
it
for
fear
of
it
(
in
front
of
the
world
)
as
it
respected
the
Pakistani
and
Indian
nuclear
weapon
and
here
Israel
will
be
safe
from
the
inspection
of
its
nuclear
facilities
under
the
pretext
of
the
presence
of
the
Iranian
facilities
and
at
that
time
it
will
talk
to
the
balance
about
the
region,
and
the
region
will
be
led
at
that
time
from
Iran
and
Israel
and
with
care
and
American
agreements
..And
the
Arabs
Sconon
is
the
victims
and
the
weakest
end
Finally
The
nuclear
energy
is
very
expensive
..
And
Iran
denies
in
its
saying
it
wants
the
nuclear
energy
for
the
peaceful
use
..
Iran
wants
the
possession
of
a
nuclear
weapon
so
that
the
superpower
becomes
in
the
region
..
Especially
that
it
possesses
all
of
the
factors
so
that
a
superpower
becomes
in
the
region
as
the
population
number
..
And
the
oil
..
And
the
geographical
location
..
And
other
than
that
..
And
only
the
nuclear
weapon
that
will
enable
it
the
achievement
of
its
Persian
expansionist
inclination
remained
the
Shiite
in
the
region
and
an
imposition
of
all
what
it
wants
the
moment
an
indication
from
it
and
the
Arabs
its
time
will
be
weaker
from
that
they
refuse
for
it
a
request
..Totally
as
he
was
doing
the
Manadhira
with
Ksra
Anoushrouan
And
a
thank
you REPLY The
West
is
accompanying
it
tries
it
in
the
region
and
he
does
not
trust
the
Shiites
At
all And
it
is
known
that
its
interests
are
with
the
Sunni
And
when
the
American
forces
entered
Iraq
after
the
liberation
of
Kuwait
and
Basra
people
rejoiced
at
that
and
revolted
They
realized
that
the
substitute
to
Saddam
will
be
a
Shiite
Therefore
they
retreated
And
they
were
content
with
the
liberation
of
Kuwait
And
they
withdrew
from
Iraq,
and
left
the
Shiites
that
face
Saddam's
punishment
From
this
side
:
she
does
not
worry
The
West
knows
that
its
interests
are
not
with
the
Shiites
Because
it
does
not
trust
them And
the
Iranian
bomb
will
be
directing
the
blackmail
of
the
Gulf
countries
first
And
he
is
not
Israel REPLY The
rational
brother
I
thank
you
many
on
your
interposition
beautiful
academy
.. Definitely
I
do
not
mean
the
labour
by
its
known
concept
..
And
if
she
returned
to
my
topic
it
does
not
find
me
that
said
that
..
But
I
meant
the
intersection
of
the
interests
..
In
the
truth
that
all
of
the
countries
is
its
dealing
built
on
the
interests
..
Until
America
relation
in
Israel
it
may
turn
into
180
degrees
if
the
interests
contradicted
and
have
becomes
America
Jews
a
target
for
a
revolution
in
America
the
Christians
can
carry
out
it
.. But
the
important
question
:
as
long
as
that
Iran
(
at
the
present
time
)
for
it
common
interests
with
America
(
and
the
evidence
as
mentioned
he
is
their
cooperation
in
the
invasion
of
Iraq
and
Afghanistan
)
...
Why
she
insists
on
playing
the
enemy
role
to
America
and
insists
on
giving
the
revolutionary
slogans
against
the
American
liberalism
and
!!!
This
is
the
greatest
evidence
on
that
behind
the
coulisses
what
behind
it
..
And
that
no
she
expressed
and
frankly
about
its
cooperation
..
And
this
cooperation
may
make
of
this
sham
enmity
a
non
justified
matter
.. Printing
I
assume
a
polemic
that
these
common
interests
did
not
appear
except
recently
...
But
the
reality
proves
by
what
does
not
leave
a
field
for
the
doubt
that
between
America
and
Iran
common
interests
are
since
the
Shah
a
passage
by
Khomeini
and
Raphsenjani
period
and
reaching
of
Khatami
and
Nijad
..
During
the
period
of
the
Shah
Iran
it
is
named
the
Gulf
policeman
..
As
for
Khomeini,
he
brought
with
American
support
and
on
a
plane
from
an
European
country
and
he
remained
only
that
do
not
dispute
him
in
the
judgement
one
of
and
was
dropping
his
rule
whether
by
the
support
of
a
Mujahideen
Khalq
Organization
or
during
the
period
of
his
war
with
Iraq
being
possible
but
the
scandal
of
Ghit's
Iran
revealed
how
Israel
was
supplying
Iran
with
the
weapons
so
that
it
keeps
a
balance
with
the
supported
Iraqi
force
from
all
the
Arab
Gulf
countries
or
by
the
fabrication
of
weapons
of
mass
destruction
charge
as
did
in
Iraq
..
This
the
greatest
evidence
that
America
was
not
wanting
dropping
the
Mollah
rule
that
was
claiming
that
it
is
grumbling
about
it
!!
..
He
imagined
that
America
was
not
fearing
the
Iranian
fundamentalist
referee
..
But
she
was
fearing
the
Baathist
Saddam
rule
!!
But
it
remains
a
Sunni
rule
in
its
view
..
This
is
not
only
but
a
Sunni
referee
got
away
from
its
control
..
And
America
is
what
I
fear
most
it
is
the
succession
of
the
fall
of
the
domino
stones
..And
he
explained
to
you
a
sufficiency
Before
6
years
approximately
she
wrote
in
the
arenas
(
under
a
defined
different
) a
topic
about
my
expectation
of
the
fall
of
Saddam's
regime
and
the
completion
of
the
Shiite
crescent
and
mentioned
in
that
topic
the
reasons
that
made
me
that
expect
the
arrival
of
a
Shiite
rule
Saddam's
allowance
and
mentioned
from
them
the
desire
of
America
for
that
..
And
some
of
the
brothers
were
pleasing
its
time
..
And
they
say
:
how
America
can
is
pleased
with
the
arrival
of
a
Shiite
rule
and
she
is
the
greatest
enemy
to
Iran
!!
..
Does
America
want
that
the
clays
increase
a
wetting
?
!!
I
was
trying
their
persuasion
that
America
is
not
an
enemy
to
Iran
..
America
is
an
enemy
of
Iraq
and
will
bring
a
Shiite
referee
..And
my
expectation
believed
I
agree
totally
with
you
that
there
are
new
coalitions
that
will
appear
in
the
region
..
But
the
number
of
permanent
countries
are
the
membership
in
the
Security
Council
that
may
increase
perhaps
with
joining
other
countries
like
India
..
The
chasm
between
Europe
and
America
increases
..
But
it
increases
between
the
Europeans
and
Britain
..
China
is
a
coming
terrific
power
certainly
..
And
there
an
attribute
abounds
in
China
that
does
not
find
it
at
all
in
the
other
powerful
states
..
And
he
is
the
harmony
..Which
makes
it
not
dividable
(
except
the
Muslims
in
Sinkiang
region
and
have
been
submitted
with
the
power
of
iron
and
fire
) A
thank
you
for
you
..Return
sheikh
on
the
other
responses
wills )
REPLY Shaker
of
you
is
your
kindness
and
your
good
opinion
I
have
presented
the
next
question
(
but
the
important
question
:
as
long
as
that
Iran
(
at
the
present
time
)
for
it
common
interests
with
America
(
and
the
evidence
as
mentioned
he
is
their
cooperation
in
the
invasion
of
Iraq
and
Afghanistan
)
...
Why
she
insists
on
playing
the
enemy
role
to
America
and
insists
on
giving
the
revolutionary
slogans
against
the
American
liberalism
and
!!!
This
is
the
greatest
evidence
on
that
behind
the
coulisses
what
behind
it
..
And
that
no
she
expressed
and
frankly
about
its
cooperation
..
And
this
cooperation
may
make
of
this
sham
enmity
a
non
justified
matter
..))
And
I
think
that
we
should
differentiate
between
the
popular
slogans
whether
that
the
government
supports
or
the
one
that
it
does
not
support
and
between
what
the
government
itself
follows
in
their
apparent
official
actions
and
not
apparent,
and
we
if
we
looked
at
the
Gulf
countries
acted,
they
if
it
allowed
the
opportunity
for
the
appearance
of
the
slogans
hostile
to
America
in
a
free
way
to
a
back
for
you
the
sharp
difference
between
the
actions
of
government
and
slogans
that
will
appear
and
that
can
be
named
slogans
( a
revolutionism
) And
if
we
returned
to
the
behind
few
and
in
Saudi
Arabia
exactly
and
before
ten
years
I
saw
the
slogans
that
show
against
America
at
that
time
the
wonder
of
wonders
despite
that
America
was
not
by
the
anti-
Muslims
situation
as
he
now
and
at
the
same
time
was
and
is
still
Saudi
Arabia
and
the
Gulf
countries
from
the
strongest
allies
to
America
. And
on
the
other
hand
look
at
the
different
reactions
between
the
Jews
towards
any
doing
that
Israel
takes
what
between
a
supporter
and
an
opponent
to
the
extent
of
that
some
of
them
carries
out
burning
the
Israeli
flag
himself,
and
it
apologized
for
the
elaboration
in
the
explanation
of
the
idea
and
may
not
deserve
this
explanation
. As
for
an
opinion
that
America
do
not
see
Iran
an
enemy
for
it
.
He
agreed
with
you
in
a
side
from
the
idea,
the
classification
of
the
enmity
is
at
the
Americans
different
degrees
then
there
the
dangerous
enemy
and
there
the
less
serious
running
and
there
the
weak
enemy
and
there
who
creates
forms
in
its
situation
according
to
who
possesses
the
authority,
and
this
disparity
is
clear
in
the
American
speech
and
in
the
dealing
also
the
official
with
these
countries,
and
I
see
that
the
classification
of
Iran
he
among
the
enemies
but
it
might
have
changed
the
danger
or
the
weak
enemy
. And
no
doubt
at
me
that
they
consider
the
Islam
cultural
and
political
danger
to
them
but
they
actually
differentiate
between
the
age
and
Shiite
and
for
each
classification
. And
for
you
my
thanks
and
my
appreciation
And
the
helper
Allah
REPLY To
more
interest
she
copied
the
next
article
Mohamed
Weld
Al
Sheikh
-
to
who
the
victory
will
be
written
in
the
confrontation
between
Iran
and
the
west؟
The
Iranian
nuclear
file
ascends
these
days
on
the
top
of
the
hot
cases
after
the
statements
in
which
the
American
president
confirmed
its
non
exclusion
the
possibility
of
hitting
directing
of
Iran
if
she
continued
the
work
in
their
nuclear
program,
while
the
Iranian
officials
confirmed
the
continuation
of
the
work
in
their
program
two
warnings
Washington
that
they
are
not
like
Iraq
or
Libya
! And
in
the
indication
of
the
Iranians
of
the
Libyan
and
Iraqi
examples
an
indication
that
Tehran
understood
the
powerful
states
game
based
on
the
distraction
style
and
the
threat
of
the
sanctions,
as
it
did
with
Iraq
that
its
commitments
to
the
decisions
of
the
international
agency
did
not
connect
to
the
safety,
by
an
amount
that
the
inspection
operations
not
were
a
reason
for
its
hitting
and
dropping
its
regime,
and
its
transfer
to
the
chaos
that
is
still
biting
it
up
till
now,
as
for
Libya,
the
western
pressures
succeeded
in
its
voluntary
abandonment
-
and
for
nothing
-
about
its
ambitious
program,
without
receiving
a
price
for
this
abandonment‚
And
Iran
by
logic
knows
that
its
conflict
now
with
the
superpowers
is
a
conflict
in
the
course
of
time
where
its
means
is
for
the
achievement
of
the
security
to
its
citizens
and
the
dimensions
of
the
ghost
of
hitting
directing
to
it
she
that
steps
with
more
closeness
cut
from
the
industry
of
the
nuclear
weapon,
that
represents
a
more
than
deterrence
means
just
the
submission
to
the
seniors
orders
and
Iran
benefits
from
the
terrible
reality
that
the
US
forces
live
in
Iraq
and
the
American
uneasiness
from
walking
the
operations
in
Iraq,
which
makes
it
is
difficult
that
the
American
government
heads
for
a
new
foolishness
with
opening
an
Iranian
front,
and
the
one
that
could
not
settle
the
war
in
Iraq
or
Afghanistan‚
And
if
the
presence
of
Iranian
weapons
was
perfect
in
Iraq,
and
that
Iran
is
involved
by
a
form
from
the
forms
in
the
military
operations
in
Iraq,
a
meaning
is
that
that
Iran
understood
early
the
American
intentions
and
dealt
with
them
by
their
style,
the
hidden
attack
and
the
war
in
the
agency,
through
the
expansion
of
the
war
time
in
Iraq
and
their
extension
with
the
supply
of
the
resistance
with
the
weapons
and
breaking
a
will
the
American
soldiers
in
Iraq
and
he
is
what
will
prevent
any
serious
thought
in
the
war
on
Iran‚
As
for
the
threat
of
western
sanctions
on
Iran,
then
he
a
threat
is
not
by
a
new
to
Iran
and
was
exposed
to
a
ban
like
this
in
the
past
and
did
not
affect
it,
and
she
is
now
the
most
ability
on
the
dealing
with
such
ban
an
imposition,
despite
the
exclusion
of
its
imposition
because
of
relation
of
strong
Tehran
with
China,
and
benefiting
Russia
from
the
deal
of
the
Iranian
nuclear
reactors
and
so
we
find
that
Iran,
and
she
at
the
beginning
of
the
rule
of
the
governors,
a
qualified
that
it
makes
what
it
was
not
capable
of
its
making
of
the
reformists
days
that
the
western
countries
did
not
give
the
opportunity
suitable
to
the
confirmation
of
their
presence
on
the
international
and
Iranian
arena,
then
the
arrival
of
the
governors
was
by
their
controversial
project
as
the
spark
that
the
confrontation
between
Iran
ignited
the
revolution
again
and
the
western
countries
rejecting
getting
Iran
the
nuclear
weapon‚
|
|
|
