Nuclear
&
Biological
Weapons

Photo
of
Oppenheimer
with
Einstein
in
1949
writing
the
letter
to
Roosevelt
that
led
to
the
Manhatten
project

Edward
Teller,the
inventor
of
the
hydrogen
bomb

1956
test
of
a
nuclear
cannon
with
a 8
inch
wide
projectile
capable
of
traveling
11
miles
with
the
force
of
the
Hiroshima
atomic
bomb.A
nuclear
cannon
that
could
travel
in
the
battlefield.
1956
test
of
Nuclear
Weapon
in
The
Pacific
Ocean.
"I'm
not
sure
what
weapons
will
be
used
in
World
War
III,but
World
War
IV
will
be
fought
with
sticks
and
stones."~Albert
Einstein

The
memory
of
the
Chernobyl
Nuclear
Accident
which
occurred
on
April
26,1986.Over
15
years
later
a
ghost
town
near
the
plant
still
remains
standing,
not
fit
for
human
occupation
.

The
First
Hydrogen
Bomb
Being
Tested
at
Eniwetok
Atoll
in
the
Pacific,1952
On
the
dawn
of
July
16,1945,
5;29
AM
Robert
Oppenheimer-the
head
scientist
of
the
atomic
bomb
project
known
as
The
Manhattan
Project
and
named
Operation
Trinity,
watched
the
first
nuclear
explosion
in
world
history
in
the
desert
of
Alamogordo
New
Mexico.
Oppenheimer
stated,"I
remember
the
line
from
the
Hindu
scripture
Bhagavad
Gita
which
says,
I
am
become
Death,
the
destroyer
of
worlds."
&
the
ancient
Greek
provides
the
text:
Pandora
opened
her
box,
and
evils
were
released
into
the
World.
2004
Estimated
Nuclear
ICBMs
United
States
10,925
Russia
20,000
France
450
China
400
Britain
185
Israel
100
India
40
Pakistan
15
North
Korea
2
 
July
16,
1945
1st
atomic
bomb
detonated,
Trinity
Site,
Alamogordo,
New
Mexico
United
States
First
nuclear
test:
1945
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1992
Total
tests:
1,030
(815
underground)
Russia
First
nuclear
test:
1949
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1990
Total
tests:
715
(496
underground)
United
Kingdom
First
nuclear
test:
1952
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1991
Total
tests:
45
(24
underground)
France
First
nuclear
test:
1960
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1996
Total
tests:
210
(160
underground)
China
First
nuclear
test:
1964
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1996
Total
tests:
43
(22
underground)
India
First
nuclear
test:
1974
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1998
Total
tests:
7
Pakistan
First
nuclear
test:
1998
Most
recent
nuclear
test:
1998
Total
tests:
6
Israel
No
Nuclear
Tests
150-350
estimated
nuclear
weapons
North
Korea
No
Nuclear
Tests
5-15
estimated
nuclear
weapons
Nuclear
weapons
derive
their
enormous
explosive
force
from
either
the
fission
or
fusion
of
atomic
nuclei.
Their
significance
may
best
be
appreciated
by
the
coining
of
the
words
kiloton
(1,000
tons)
and
megaton
(one
million
tons)
to
describe
their
blast
effect
in
equivalent
weights
of
TNT.
For
example,
the
first
nuclear
fission
bomb,
the
one
dropped
on
Hiroshima,
Japan,
in
1945,
released
energy
equaling
15,000
tons
(15
kilotons)
of
chemical
explosive
from
less
than
130
pounds
(60
kilograms)
of
uranium.
Fusion
bombs,
on
the
other
hand,
have
given
yields
up
to
almost
60
megatons.
The
first
nuclear
weapons
were
bombs
delivered
by
aircraft;
warheads
for
strategic
ballistic
missiles,
however,
have
become
by
far
the
most
important
nuclear
weapons
(see
above
Strategic
missiles).
There
are
also
smaller
tactical
nuclear
weapons
that
include
artillery
projectiles,
demolition
munitions
(land
mines),
antisubmarine
depth
bombs,
torpedoes,
and
short-range
ballistic
and
cruise
missiles.
The
U.S.
stockpile
of
nuclear
weapons
reached
its
peak
in
1967
with
more
than
32,000
warheads
of
30
different
types;
the
Soviet
stockpile
reached
its
peak
of
about
33,000
warheads
in
1988.Also
called
ATOMIC
WEAPON,
or
THERMONUCLEAR
WEAPON,
bomb
or
other
warhead
that
derives
its
force
from
either
the
fission
or
the
fusion
of
atomic
nuclei
and
is
delivered
by
an
aircraft,
missile,
Earth
satellite,
or
other
strategic
delivery
system.
A
brief
treatment
of
nuclear
weapons
follows.
For
full
treatment,
see
War,
The
Technology
of:
Modern
weapons
and
weapon
systems.Nuclear
weapons
are
the
most
potent
explosive
devices
yet
invented
and
may
be
deployed
in
such
"delivery
systems"
as
missiles
and
even
artillery
shells.
They
derive
their
destructive
force
from
energy
contained
in
the
core,
or
nucleus,
of
atoms.
This
energy
may
be
explosively
released
in
two
types
of
nuclear
reactions:
fission,
in
which
heavy-element
nuclei
break
down
into
fragments
(which
actually
constitute
lighter
elements),
and
fusion,
in
which
the
nuclei
of
the
lightest
element
(hydrogen)
are
squeezed
together
at
high
temperatures
and
fuse
to
form
helium
nuclei.
Nuclear
weapons
are
accordingly
classified
as
fission
(or
"atomic")
or
fusion
("hydrogen,"
or
"thermonuclear")
bombs.
Fission
devices
use
uranium
or
plutonium
as
fuel.
When
a
sufficient
amount
of
the
fuel
is
suddenly
brought
together,
the
fission
of
one
nucleus
causes
the
fission
of
others;
these
bring
about
the
fission
of
still
more
in
turn.
The
process
continues
until
all
the
fuel
is
consumed.
This
is
called
a
chain
reaction,
and
the
amount
of
fuel
needed
for
it
to
occur
is
called
the
critical
mass.
The
critical
mass
depends
upon
the
type
and
purity
of
the
fuel
and
upon
the
amount
(mass)
of
the
fuel
present.
In
gun-type
devices,
one
subcritical-sized
piece
of
fuel
is
fired
down
a
gunlike
barrel
into
another,so
that
there
is
a
supercritical
amount
at
the
moment
of
impact
that
initiates
the
chain
reaction.
In
implosion-
type
devices,
explosives
surround
a
hollow
sphere
of
fissionable
fuel,
which
at
the
moment
of
detonation
is
squeezed
into
one
supercritical
mass.
The
implosion
technique
is
the
more
effective
and
requires
less
fuel.
(see
also
Index:
atomic
bomb,
nuclear
chain
reaction,
gun)
Fusion
devices
are
inherently
vastly
more
powerful
than
those
utilizing
only
fission,
although
very
small
ones
have
also
been
developed
(see
neutron
bomb).
A
fission
bomb
is
used
as
a
detonator,
to
generate
the
extremely
high
temperatures
needed
to
induce
the
atomic
nuclei
of
hydrogen
isotopes
(deuterium
and
tritium)
to
combine,
or
fuse.
Special
radiation
reflectors
inside
the
bomb
are
used
to
control
the
X-ray
and
gamma-ray
"radiation
pressure"
generated
by
the
fission
bomb,
which
would
otherwise
radiate
outward.
The
reflectors
direct
the
radiation
pressure
in
such
a
way
that
it
squeezes
a
small
cylinder
containing
the
fuel
simultaneously
from
all
sides.
This
has
to
be
done
before
other,
slower-moving
blast
fragments
destroy
the
shields
and
other
parts
of
the
bomb;
only
a
millionth
of
a
second
delay
is
required,
however,
for
the
radiation
to
race
ahead
of
the
blast
fragments
and
cause
fusion.The
explosive
force,
or
"yield,"
of
a
nuclear
device
is
measured
in
the
number
of
thousands
of
tons
(kilotons)
or
millions
of
tons
(megatons)
of
TNT
that
it
would
take
to
generate
an
equivalently
powerful
blast.
Fission
bombs
are
usually
measured
in
kilotons,
while
fusion
bombs
with
yields
of
up
to
about
60
megatons
have
been
tested.
A
mere
six
years
elapsed
between
the
discovery
of
fission
and
the
use
of
its
energy
to
destroy
the
Japanese
city
of
Hiroshima.
Early
in
1939
several
physicists
concluded
that
when
atoms
of
a
certain
isotope
of
uranium
are
bombarded
with
neutrons,
they
split,
releasing
energy
and
more
neutrons.
The
discovery
that
upon
absorbing
one
neutron
the
uranium
atom
emits
a
few
more
raised
the
possibility
of
staging
an
energy-releasing
chain
reaction.
U.S.
President
Franklin
D.
Roosevelt
was
alerted
to
the
military
significance
of
nuclear
fission,
and
in
response
he
created
what
became
known
as
the
Manhattan
Project,
which
was
given
the
task
of
designing
and
building
the
first
atomic
bomb.
The
Manhattan
Project
involved
teams
of
scientists
working
on
separate
problems
at
several
locations
throughout
the
United
States.
On
Dec.
2,
1942,
a
milestone
in
the
project
was
reached
when
a
self-sustaining
chain
reaction
was
achieved
by
the
project's
scientists
in
Chicago.
Researchers
at
Los
Alamos,
N.M.,
tested
the
first
atomic
bomb
on
July
16,
1945.
The
test
bomb
was
named
Trinity,
had
a
yield
of
21
kilotons,
and
was
of
an
implosion-type,
plutonium-fuel
design.
It
was
an
untested
gun-type
uranium
bomb,
however,
that
was
dropped
by
a
B-29
bomber
on
Hiroshima
on
Aug.
6,
1945,
destroying
two-thirds
of
the
city.
A
duplicate
of
the
Trinity
bomb
was
dropped
on
Nagasaki
three
days
later.
The
development
of
atomic
bombs
was
then
undertaken
by
several
other
countries.
The
Soviet
Union
tested
its
first
fission
bomb
in
1949,
the
United
Kingdom
in
1952,
France
in
1960,
China
in
1964,
and
India
in
1974.
Several
other
nations
since
then
are
reported
to
have
acquired
sufficient
knowledge
and
materials
to
be
able
to
produce
nuclear
weapons.
Development
of
the
fusion
bomb
followed
that
of
the
fission
bomb,
in
part
because
of
the
elaborate
calculations
involved,
which
had
to
be
carried
out
on
the
most
advanced
computers
then
available.
On
Nov.
1,
1952,
the
United
States
successfully
tested
the
first
thermonuclear
fusion
device
on
an
island
in
the
Pacific.
The
Soviet
Union
tested
its
first
device
in
1953,
the
United
Kingdom
in
1957,
China
in
1967,
and
France
in
1968.
The
actual
blast
of
a
nuclear
device
is
only
one
of
its
destructive
effects.
Others
are
the
blinding
light
and
searing
heat
that
it
produces,
and
still
another
is
an
amount
of
lethal
radiation
that
may
persist
in
the
environment
for
hundreds
or
even
thousands
of
years
in
the
form
of
highly
toxic
radioactive
isotopes.
This
"fallout,"
or
radioactive
dust
kicked
up
by
the
blast
into
the
atmosphere,
may
be
carried
by
winds
over
great
distances,
posing
a
long-term
radioactivity
hazard.
The
strategic
effectiveness
of
nuclear
weapons
ultimately
depends
not
so
much
upon
their
explosive
power
as
upon
the
indetectability
and
accuracy
of
the
delivery
system
used.
The
Hiroshima
and
Nagasaki
bombs
were
carried
by
large,
vulnerable
airplanes.
Today,
nuclear
devices
have
been
sufficiently
miniaturized
to
fit
inside
missiles
and
even
artillery
shells.
The
development
of
computerized
missile-guidance
systems
has
made
possible
MIRVs,
or
multiple
warheads,
each
of
which
is
independently
guided
to
a
different
target
after
release
by
the
carrier
missile
at
the
start
of
reentry
from
space.
Missiles
may
also
be
launched
from
submarines
or
from
land-based
mobile
launchers
or
"hardened"
silos.
The
first
talks
to
restrict
testing
of
nuclear
weapons
were
carried
out
between
the
Soviet
Union
and
the
United
States
in
the
mid-1950s.
In
1963
a
Nuclear
Test-Ban
Treaty
(q.v.)
was
worked
out
between
the
United
States,
the
Soviet
Union,
and
the
United
Kingdom
a
treaty
that
all
but
a
few
nations
have
signed.
Negotiations
to
limit
or
dismantle
the
weapons
themselves.From
the
late
1940s,
U.S.
nuclear
weapon
designers
developed
and
tested
warheads
to
improve
their
ballistics,
to
standardize
designs
for
mass
production,
to
increase
yields,
to
improve
yield-to-weight
and
yield-to-volume
ratios,
and
to
study
their
effects.
These
improvements
resulted
in
the
creation
of
nuclear
warheads
for
a
wide
variety
of
strategic
and
tactical
delivery
systems.
The
basic
principle
of
the
fusion
weapon
(also
called
the
thermonuclear
or
hydrogen
bomb)
is
to
produce
ignition
conditions
in
a
thermonuclear
fuel
such
as
deuterium,
an
isotope
of
hydrogen
with
double
the
weight
of
normal
hydrogen,
or
lithium
deuteride.
The
Sun
may
be
considered
a
thermonuclear
device;
its
main
fuel
is
deuterium,
which
it
consumes
in
its
core
at
temperatures
of
18,000,000
to
36,000,000
F
(10,000,000
to
20,000,000
C).
To
achieve
comparable
temperatures
in
a
weapon,
a
fission
triggering
device
is
used
Flexible
response
did
not
prescribe
a
particular
course
of
action;
rather,
it
retained
for
NATO
the
possibility
that
it
would
be
the
first
to
use
nuclear
weapons
and
suggested
that
this
initially
would
involve
short-range,
tactical
weapons.
(see
also
Index:
limited
warfare)
When
tactical
nuclear
weapons
such
as
the
Honest
John
rocket
were
introduced
into
the
NATO
inventory
during
the
1950s,
the
U.S.
Army
had
supposed
that
these
could
be
considered
quite
separately
from
intercontinental
strategic
missiles.
If
anything,
tactical
nuclear
weapons
were
closer
to
conventional
weapons
and
were
to
be
integrated
with
general-purpose
forces.
A
number
of
strategic
thinkers
in
the
United
States,
including
Henry
Kissinger
and
Robert
Osgood,
hoped
that,
if
the
West
could
reinforce
its
military
strength
in
this
way,
it
would
be
possible
to
take
on
communists
in
limited
nuclear
wars
without
resort
to
incredible
threats
of
massive
retaliation.However,
once
the
widespread
use
of
battlefield
nuclear
weapons
by
NATO
was
simulated
in war
games
in
the
1950s,
it
became
apparent
that
they
would
result
in
such
death
and
destruction
that
they
could
in
no
way
be
considered
conventional.
Also,
as
Warsaw
Pact
forces
obtained
comparable
capabilities
with
such
weapons
as
the
SS-1
missile,
any
Western
advantage
seemed
neutralized.
Unless
a
retreating
defender
used
nuclear
weapons
immediately,
any
later
use
could
well
be
over
his
own
territory
and
against
a
dispersed
enemy.
And,
if
tactical
nuclear
weapons
were
used
to
impose
great
costs
on
the
enemy,
there
would
be
a
risk
that
the
conflict
could
soon
escalate
to
strategic
nuclear
use.
Limited
nuclear
war,
therefore,
appeared
a
contradiction
in
terms.European
governments
were
still
loath
to
dispense
with
the
weapons.
Although
they
could
not
be
considered
ordinary
weapons
of
war,
their
close
integration
with
conventional
forces
meant
that
they
were
more
likely
than
U.S.
strategic
nuclear
forces
to
get
entangled
in
a
land
war
in
Europe.
The
idea
was
to
use
the
risk
of
escalating
to
total
nuclear
war
with
the
United
States
as
a
powerful
deterrent
effect
on
the
Soviet
Union's
actions
in
Europe.
According
to
this
strategy,
deterrence
did
not
require
a
certainty
that
nuclear
weapons
would
be
used,
but
only
a
risk.
The
consequences
of
miscalculation
were
so
horrendous
that
a
government
would
dare
not
gamble.
However,
the
United
States,
whose
own
security
was
now
being
linked
to
peace
in
Europe,
was
still
more
concerned
that
miscalculation
might
nonetheless
take
place.
Certainly,
NATO's
procedures
for
"going
nuclear"
were
designed
to
reduce
the
risk
of
unauthorized
use.
But
this
created
a
tension
between
theory,
which
suggested
that
deterrence
was
served
by
the
risk
that
a
conflict
might
get
out
of
control,
and
practice,
which
exhibited
a
determination
not
to
lose
control.
The
tension
was
reflected
in
discussions
over
how
to
replace
the
first
generation
of
tactical
nuclear
weapons
as
they
became
obsolete
in
the
1970s.
If
the
next
generation
were
made
smaller
and
more
precise,
then
this
would
imply
a
readiness
to
use
them
to
fight
a
nuclear
war
rather
than
simply
deter.
An
apparent
readiness
to
wage
nuclear
war
was
at
the
heart
of
a
controversy
over
the
"neutron
bomb"
(actually
a
thermonuclear
missile
warhead
or
artillery
shell
of
enhanced
radiation
and
reduced
blast),
which
was
criticized
for
blurring
the
boundary
between
conventional
and
nuclear
weapons
and
thereby
making
it
much
easier
to
go
nuclear.Even
greater
controversy
was
generated
by
NATO's
decision
in
1979
to
replace
the
Pershing
IA,
a
medium-range
ballistic
missile,
with
two
weapons
that
would
constitute
a
more
powerful
intermediate
nuclear
force
(INF):
the
Pershing
II
intermediate-range
ballistic
missile
(IRBM)
and
the
Tomahawk
cruise
missile.
The
origins
of
the
program
to
modernize
the
INF
lay
in
two
western
European
concerns
over
the
U.S.
nuclear
guarantee.
The
first
concern
resulted
from
the
tendency
of
the
United
States
in
the
Strategic
Arms
Limitation
Talks
to
concentrate
on
achieving
symmetry
between
the
nuclear
forces
of
the
two
superpowers,
while
paying
little
attention
to
the
superiority,
within
the
European
theatre,
of
the
Warsaw
Pact
in
both
nuclear
and
conventional
weapons.
Particularly
worrisome
was
the
Soviet
SS-20,
an
IRBM
that
was
first
tested
in
1974
and
deployed
in
1977.
Although
the
SS-20
did
not
signal
any
shift
in
Soviet
policy
(U.S.
military
bases
in
Europe
and
the
British,
French,
and
Chinese
nuclear
forces
had
long
been
targeted),
it
was
the
first
new
missile
designed
for
this
purpose
to
have
appeared
in
some
time.
In
1977
Chancellor
Helmut
Schmidt
of
West
Germany
argued
that
NATO
should
not
tolerate
Soviet
superiority
in
such
weapons.
This
suggested
that
the
imbalance
should
be
dealt
with
either
through
arms
control
or
by
an
equivalent
Western
effort
to
upgrade
its
own
INF.The
second
concern
placed
far
less
stress
on
the
SS-20
and
more
on
the
requirements,
within
NATO's
strategy
of
flexible
response,
to
be
able
to
strike
Soviet
territory
with
systems
based
in
western
Europe
in
the
event
of
full-scale
war
on
the
Continent.
This
requirement
existed
irrespective
of
the
new
Soviet
missiles,
and
it
was
becoming
problematic
because
of
the
age
of
NATO's
medium
bombers
and
the
lack
of
any
U.S.
intermediate-range
land-based
missile
in
Europe.
A
modernized
INF
made
more
sense
than
systems
designed
for
battlefield
use,
because
they
posed
a
direct
threat
to
the
Soviet
homeland
and
thus
challenged
Soviet
ideas
of
confining
any
nuclear
exchanges
to
NATO
and
Warsaw
Pact
countries,
with
superpower
territory
accorded
sanctuary
status.
However,
large-scale
protests
sprang
up
in
Europe
and
North
America
after
the
decision
to
modernize.
Voicing
a
concern
that
a
new
arms
race
was
getting
under
way
in
Europe,
they
took
on
special
urgency
following
the
Soviet
invasion
of
Afghanistan
(two
weeks
after
NATO's
decision
on
the
INF),
with
the
decline
of
arms
control,
and
with
the
election
of
Ronald
Reagan,
who
had
a
hawkish
reputation,
to
the
U.S.
presidency.
The
strength
of
the
protests
encouraged
NATO
to
moderate
its
policy.
The
rationale
for
modernizing
the
INF
was
switched
from
the
requirements
of
flexible
response
to
the
more
politically
marketable
aim
of
matching
the
deployment
of
the
SS-20,
and
in
November
1981,
at
the
start
of
negotiations
on
this
issue,
Reagan
offered
to
eliminate
NATO's
INF
if
all
SS-20s
were
removed.
This
"zero
option"
was
rejected
by
Leonid
Brezhnev,
and,
despite
warnings
from
the
Soviet
Union
that
deployment
of
a
modernized
INF
would
mean
the
end
of
negotiations,
the
first
Tomahawk
and
Pershing
II
missiles
were
delivered
in
late
1983.
Yury
Andropov
promptly
broke
off
the
INF
talks,
hoping
to
force
a
breach
in
the
unanimity
of
the
NATO
allies,
but,
when
the
expected
crisis
failed
to
arise,
Konstantin
Chernenko
agreed
to
resume
negotiations.
Soon
afterward
Gorbachev
was
in
charge,
and
he
decided
that
the
zero
option
was
in
the
Soviet
interest:
eliminating
the
INF
would
remove
a
direct
threat
to
Soviet
territory
in
return
for
removing
a
larger
number
of
Soviet
missiles
that
could
strike
only
the
allies
of
the
United
States.
In
December
1987,
Gorbachev
and
Reagan
signed
the
INF
Treaty.
Although
America's
allies
saw
that
the
treaty
had
political
benefits
in
improving
East-West
relations,
some
strategists
worried
that
it
sounded
the
death
knell
for
nuclear
deterrence.
One
response
by
NATO
was
to
see
whether
it
would
be
possible
to
build
up
other
nuclear
systems
by
way
of
compensation,
but
the
difficulty
here
was
that
the
improved
political
climate
undermined
public
support
for
such
moves.
In
West
Germany
the
question
of
modernizing
the
short-range
Lance
missile
was
coloured
by
the
direct
and
almost
unique
threat
this
weapon
posed
to
German
territory.
There
had
always
been
the
strongest
official
support
for
the
traditional
concept
of
nuclear
deterrence
in
that
country,
but,
with
the
political
climate
improving,
West
German
politicians
such
as
Chancellor
Helmut
Kohl
came
to
argue
that
yet
another
nuclear
modernization
program
would
send
the
wrong
signals
to
the
East.
They
were
also
unhappy
at
the
apparent
readiness
of
the
United
States
and
Britain
to
retain
Germany
as
a
battlefield
for
short-range
nuclear
exchanges
while
securing
the
removal
of
intermediate-
and
long-range
systems
that
threatened
their
own
territories.
The
Soviet
Union
possessed
large
numbers
of
short-range
missiles
and
had
been
modernizing
them
for
a
decade
with
such
systems
as
the
SS-21,
but
Gorbachev
indicated
a
readiness
to
negotiate
their
complete
elimination.
British
prime
minister
Margaret
Thatcher
and
U.S.
president
George
Bush
insisted
that
this
would
be
imprudent,
and,
following
their
lead,
NATO
agreed
in
1989
to
postpone
modernizing
the
Lance
in
the
hope
that
negotiations
on
conventional
force
reductions
would
reach
a
satisfactory
conclusion
and
thus
reduce
the
importance
of
nuclear
weapons
as
a
means
of
compensating
for
the
Warsaw
Pact's
conventional
superiority.
The
Bush
administration
was
more
orthodox
on
nuclear
matters
than
its
predecessor,
but
Reagan's
interest
in
a
nuclear-free
world--highlighted
by
SDI,
the
Reykjavík
summit,
and
the
INF
Treaty--had
already
encouraged
discussion
among
some
Europeans
of
the
possibility
of
a
European
defense
community
that
would
be
less
dependent
upon
the
United
States.
In
practice
this
would
require
the
substitution
of
a
French
and
British
strategic
nuclear
guarantee
for
an
American.
Britain
had
always,
officially
at
least,
committed
its
strategic
nuclear
forces
(which
since
the
late
1960s
had
been
SLBMs)
to
NATO.
Britain's
rationale
for
maintaining
a
national
nuclear
force
involved
a
combination
of
the
political
influence
that
could
be
brought
to
bear
on
its
allies,
especially
the
United
States,
and
a
claim
to
be
contributing
to
the
overall
deterrent
posture.
France,
by
contrast,
had
always
had
a
much
more
nationalistic
rationale,
but
after
the
1970s,
following
the
introduction
of
the
Pluton
short-range
missile,
which
could
only
land
on
German
territory,
it
was
obliged
to
consider
the
role
that
its
force
de
frappe
might
have
in
the
defense
of
its
allies.
In
any
event,
neither
Britain
nor
France
was
eager
to
take
over
from
the
United
States
the
broader
deterrent
role;
nor
were
those
who
had
previously
sheltered
under
the
U.S.
umbrella
interested
in
a
European
alternative.
Refinements
of
the
basic
two-stage
Teller-Ulam
configuration
resulted
in
thermonuclear
weapons
with
a
wide
variety
of
characteristics
and
applications.
Some
high-yield
deliverable
weapons
incorporated
additional
thermonuclear
fuel
(lithium
deuteride)
and
fissionable
material
(uranium-235
and
uranium-238)
in
a
third
stage.
While
there
was
no
theoretical
limit
to
the
yield
that
could
be
achieved
from
a
thermonuclear
bomb
(for
example,
by
adding
more
stages),
there
were
practical
limits
on
the
size
and
weight
of
weapons
that
could
be
carried
by
aircraft
or
missiles.
The
largest
U.S.
bombs
had
yields
of
from
10
to
20
megatons
and
weighed
up
to
20
tons.
Beginning
in
the
early
1960s,
however,
the
United
States
built
a
variety
of
smaller,
lighter
weapons
that
exhibited
steadily
improving
yield-to-weight
and
yield-to-volume
ratios
Military
activities
of
any
kind
cannot
be
carried
out
on
the
Moon
(the
Moon
Treaty
of
1979),
Antarctica
(the
Antarctic
Treaty
of
1959),
or
on
the
territory
(including
the
airspace)
or
territorial
waters
of
neutral
states.
In
addition,
nuclear
weapons
or
other
weapons
of
mass
destruction
cannot
be
orbited
around
the
Earth
(the
Outer
Space
Treaty
of
1967)
or
placed
on
the
seabed
(the
Seabed
Treaty
of
1971).formally
TREATY
ON
PRINCIPLES
GOVERNING
THE
ACTIVITIES
OF
STATES
IN
THE
EXPLORATION
AND
USE
OF
OUTER
SPACE,
INCLUDING
THE
MOON
AND
OTHER
CELESTIAL
BODIES
(1967),
international
treaty
binding
the
parties
to
use
outer
space
only
for
peaceful
purposes.
In
June
1966
the
United
States
and
the
Soviet
Union
submitted
draft
treaties
on
the
uses
of
space
to
the
United
Nations.
These
were
reconciled
during
several
months
of
negotiation
in
the
Legal
Subcommittee
of
the
UN
Committee
on
the
Peaceful
Uses
of
Outer
Space,
and
the
resulting
document
was
endorsed
by
the
UN
General
Assembly
on
Dec.
19,
1966,
and
opened
for
signature
on
Jan.
27,
1967.
The
treaty
came
into
force
on
Oct.
10,
1967,
after
being
ratified
by
the
United
States,
the
Soviet
Union,
the
United
Kingdom,
and
several
other
countries.Under
the
terms
of
the
treaty,
the
parties
are
prohibited
from
placing
nuclear
arms
or
other
weapons
of
mass
destruction
in
orbit,
on
the
Moon,
or
on
other
bodies
in
space.
Nations
cannot
claim
sovereignty
over
the
Moon
or
other
celestial
bodies.
Nations
are
responsible
for
their
activities
in
space,
are
liable
for
any
damage
caused
by
objects
launched
into
space
from
their
territory,
and
are
bound
to
assist
astronauts
in
distress.
Their
space
installations
and
vehicles
shall
be
open,
on
a
reciprocal
basis,
to
representatives
of
other
countries,
and
all
parties
agree
to
conduct
outer-space
activities
openly
and
in
accordance
with
international
law.
The
HYDROGEN
BOMB,
or
H-BOMB,
weapon
whose
enormous
explosive
power
results
from
an
uncontrolled,
self-sustaining
chain
reaction
in
which
isotopes
of
hydrogen
combine
under
extremely
high
temperatures
to
form
helium
in
a
process
known
as
nuclear
fusion
(q.v.).
The
high
temperatures
that
are
required
for
the
reaction
are
produced
by
the
detonation
of
an
atomic
bomb.
(see
also
Index:
nuclear
fusion)
A
thermonuclear
bomb
differs
fundamentally
from
an
atomic
bomb
in
that
it
utilizes
the
energy
released
when
two
light
atomic
nuclei
combine,
or
fuse,
to
form
a
heavier
nucleus.
An
atomic
bomb,
by
contrast,
uses
the
energy
released
when
a
heavy
atomic
nucleus
splits,
or
fissions,
into
two
lighter
nuclei.
Under
ordinary
circumstances
atomic
nuclei
carry
positive
electrical
charges
that
act
to
strongly
repel
other
nuclei
and
prevent
them
from
getting
close
to
one
another.
Only
under
temperatures
of
millions
of
degrees
can
the
positively
charged
nuclei
gain
sufficient
kinetic
energy,
or
speed,
to
overcome
their
mutual
electric
repulsion
and
approach
close
enough
to
each
other
to
combine
under
the
attraction
of
the
short-ranged
nuclear
force.
The
very
light
nuclei
of
hydrogen
atoms
are
ideal
candidates
for
this
fusion
process
because
they
carry
weak
positive
charges
and
there
is
thus
less
resistance
to
overcome.
The
hydrogen
nuclei
that
combine
to
form
heavier
helium
nuclei
must
lose
a
small
portion
of
their
mass
(about
0.63
percent)
in
order
to
"fit
together"
in
a
single
larger
atom.
They
lose
this
mass
by
converting
it
completely
into
energy,
according
to
Albert
Einstein's
famous
formula:
E =
mc2.
According
to
this
formula,
the
amount
of
energy
created
is
equal
to
the
amount
of
mass
that
is
converted
multiplied
by
the
speed
of
light
squared.
The
energy
thus
produced
forms
the
explosive
power
of
a
hydrogen
bomb.
(see
also
Index:
relativity)
Deuterium
and
tritium,
which
are
isotopes
of
hydrogen,
provide
ideal
interacting
nuclei
for
the
fusion
process.
Two
atoms
of
deuterium,
each
with
one
proton
and
one
neutron,
or
tritium,
with
one
proton
and
two
neutrons,
combine
during
the
fusion
process
to
form
a
heavier
helium
nucleus,
which
has
two
protons
and
either
one
or
two
neutrons.
In
current
thermonuclear
bombs,
lithium
deuteride
is
used
as
the
fusion
fuel;
it
is
transformed
to
tritium
early
in
the
fusion
process.
In
a
thermonuclear
bomb,
the
explosive
process
begins
with
the
detonation
of
what
is
called
the
primary
stage.
This
consists
of
a
relatively
small
quantity
of
conventional
explosives,
the
detonation
of
which
brings
together
enough
fissionable
uranium
to
create
a
fission
chain
reaction,
which
in
turn
produces
another
explosion
and
a
temperature
of
several
million
degrees.
The
force
and
heat
of
this
explosion
are
reflected
back
by
a
surrounding
container
of
uranium
and
are
channeled
toward
the
secondary
stage,
made
up
of
tritium
or
other
fusion
fuel.
The
tremendous
heat
initiates
fusion,
and
the
resulting
explosion
of
the
secondary
stage
blows
the
uranium
container
apart
and
causes
it
too
to
fission,
thus
contributing
to
the
explosion
and
producing
fallout
(the
deposition
of
radioactive
materials
from
the
atmosphere)
in
the
process.
(A
neutron
bomb
is
a
thermonuclear
device
in
which
the
uranium
container
is
absent,
thus
producing
much
less
blast
but
a
lethal
"enhanced
radiation"
of
neutrons.)
The
entire
series
of
explosions
in
a
thermonuclear
bomb
takes
a
fraction
of
a
second
to
occur.A
thermonuclear
explosion
produces
blast,
light,
heat,
and
varying
amounts
of
fallout.
The
concussive
force
of
the
blast
itself
takes
the
form
of
a
shock
wave
that
radiates
from
the
point
of
the
explosion
at
supersonic
speeds
and
that
can
completely
destroy
any
building
within
a
radius
of
several
miles.
The
intense
white
light
of
the
explosion
can
cause
permanent
blindness
to
people
gazing
at
it
from
a
distance
of
dozens
of
miles.
The
explosion's
intense
light
and
heat
set
wood
and
other
combustible
materials
afire
at
a
range
of
many
miles,
creating
huge
fires
that
may
coalesce
into
a
firestorm.
The
radioactive
fallout
contaminates
air,
water,
and
soil
and
may
continue
years
after
the
explosion;
its
distribution
is
virtually
worldwide.Thermonuclear
bombs
can
be
hundreds
or
even
thousands
of
times
more
powerful
than
atomic
bombs.
The
explosive
yield
of
atomic
bombs
is
measured
in
kilotons,
each
unit
of
which
equals
the
explosive
force
of
1,000
tons
of
TNT.
The
explosive
power
of
hydrogen
bombs,
by
contrast,
is
frequently
expressed
in
megatons,
each
unit
of
which
equals
the
explosive
force
of
1,000,000
tons
of
TNT.
Hydrogen
bombs
of
more
than
50
megatons
have
been
detonated,
but
the
explosive
power
of
the
weapons
mounted
on
strategic
missiles
usually
ranges
from
100
kilotons
to
1.5
megatons.
Thermonuclear
bombs
can
be
made
small
enough
(a
few
feet
long)
to
fit
in
the
warheads
of
intercontinental
ballistic
missiles;
these
missiles
can
travel
almost
halfway
across
the
globe
in
20
or
25
minutes
and
have
computerized
guidance
systems
so
accurate
that
they
can
land
within
a
few
hundred
yards
of
a
designated
target.Edward
Teller
and
other
American
scientists
developed
the
first
hydrogen
bomb,
which
was
tested
at
Enewetak
atoll
on
Nov.
1,
1952.
The
U.S.S.R.
first
tested
a
hydrogen
bomb
on
Aug.
12,
1953,
followed
by
the
United
Kingdom
in
May
1957,
China
(1967),
and
France
(1968).
During
the
late
1980s
there
were
some
40,000
thermonuclear
devices
stored
in
the
arsenals
of
the
world's
nuclear-armed
nations.
This
number
declined
during
the
1990s.
The
massive
destructive
threat
of
these
weapons
has
been
a
principal
concern
of
the
world's
populace
and
of
its
statesmen
since
the
1950s
This
page
has
many
articles
on
nuclear
weapons
Bulletin
of
the
Atomic
Scientists
Also
see
www.uscoldwar.com
Transient
electromagnetic
devices
are
not
hard
to
make
and
can
be
stuffed
in
a
briefcase
or
into
a
Van.They
could
ZAP
our
computer
based
infrastructure.None
of
these
scenarios
has
happened
yet,
but
recent
hearings
before
the
Congress
Joint
Economic
Committee,or
JEC,under
the
leadership
of
Chairman
James
Saxon,a
New
Jersey
Republican,raise's
a
chilling
possibility
of
terrorists
threats
to
the
national
infrastructure
using
new
developments
in
Radio
Frequency,or
RF,that
any
handyman
familiar
with
electronics
and
mechanics,could
build
such
a
device.For
years,military
nations
around
the
world
have
spent
millions
on
devices
that
would
generate
and
focus
high
powered
microwaves,pr
HPM,aimed
at
disrupting
the
circuits
of
missiles,aircraft,satellites
and
command
and
control
computers.But
there
is
another
type
of
RF
weapon
that
produces
a
single
spike
of
energy
which
envelopes
the
target
across
the
entire
electromagnetic
spectrum,interrupting
the
flow
of
electrons
performing
computer
calculations,and
in
some
cases
damaging
the
microchip
circuit
themselves.This
one
is
called
a
transient
electronic
device,or
TED.The
TED
is
in
fact
based
upon
modern
versions
of
the
spark-gap
technology
discovered
by
Michael
Faraday
in
the
19th
century.Any
good
engineering
student
with
access
to
a
textbook
or
the
Internet,could
go
to
a Radio
Shack
and
an
auto
parts
store
and
build
one.Military
experts
long
dismissed
the
possibility
of
a
backyard
bomber
coming
up
with
a
RF
weapon.But
the
panel
assembled
by
Saxton
comes
up
with
a
more
somber
assessment.Witnesses
testified
that
the
TED
in-a-briefcase
already
has
been
developed
by
a
Russian
technical
institute
and
is
for
sale
for
$100,000
to
interested
parties.A
witness
from
the
Department
of
Defense,said
that
the
military
takes
the
possibility
of
RF
attacks
so
seriously
that
it
has
been
testing
such
effects
live
in
the
field
on
surplus
Huey
helicopter
gunships.
The
threatfrom
chemical/biological
warfare
is
now
of
a
magnitude
that
has
not
been
seen
since
the
cold
war.It
is
the
same
with
nuclear
proliferation.Now,because
of
our
reliance
on
high-tech
systems,computers,the
threat
of
radio
frequency
weapons
is
emerging
as
a
serious
threat.Our
economies
have
been
built
around
the
computer
chip
and
associated
networks.It
has
long
been
known
that
high
level
nuclear
explosions
generate
an
electromagnetic
pulse,or
EMP,which
on
the
battlefield
can
have
a
devastating
effect
on
other
weapons
and
communications
that
control
strategic
commands.
The
U.S.
military
has
spent
billions
of
dollars
to
develop
hardening
devices
to
shield
critical
systems
from
EMP
weapons.At
the
same
time
former
Soviet
States,includind
Russia,and
the
The
United
States
have
looked
for
ways
to
focus
and
generate
high-powered
microwaves
as
a
weapon
without
having
to
set
off
a
nuclear
explosion.
The
idea
of
the
cobalt
bomb
originated
with
Leo
Szilard
who
publicized
it
in
Feb.1950,not
as
a
serious
proposal
for
a
weapon,but
to
point
out
that
it
would
soon
be
possible
in
principle
to
build
a
single
weapon
that
would
kill
everyone
on
earth.To
design
such
a
weapon
a
radioactive
isotope
is
needed
that
can
be
dispersed
world
wide
before
it
decays.The
design
would
be
reminiscent
of
a
fission-fusion-fission
weapon.A
thick
cobalt
metal
blanket
is
used
to
capture
the
fusion
neutrons
to
maximize
the
fallout
hazard.Instead
of
generating
additional
explosive
force
from
fast
fission
U-238
the
cobalt
is
transmuted
into
Co-60
which
produces
energetic
&
penetrating
gamma
rays.When
Leo
Szilard
visited
Albert
Einstein
on
Long
Island,NY.
to
get
his
signature
on
a
famous
letter
to
Franklin
Roosevelt
that
sparked
the
atomic
program
it
was
Edward
Teller
(Inventor
of
the
Hydrogen
Bomb)
who
drove
the
car.Edward
Teller
recommended
that
the
United
States
set
an
example
to
the
world
by
continuing
thermo
nuclear
research.Teller
won
the
argument
with
the
help
of
Joseph
Stalin.
The
Soviet
Union
had
already
tested
their
own
atomic
weapon
and
President
Truman
ordered
a
crash
program
to
build
the
hydrogen
bomb
since
the
U.S.S.R
had
already
successfully
detonated
their
nuclear
device
and
ended
the
United
States
monopoly
on
military
superiority.
Brief
History
Of
The
Cold
War
-------------------
Biological
warfare
agents
are
infectious
microbes,
including
viruses,
bacteria,
and
fungi,
intended
for
use
in
warfare
because
of
their
pathogenic
effects
on
people,
animals,
or
plants.
The
development,
production,
and
stockpiling
of
weapons
based
on
them
were
outlawed
by
the
1972
Biological
Weapons
Convention,
to
which
more
than
100
states
were
party,
including
all
five
permanent
members
of
the
United
Nations
Security
Council.
The
treaty
also
covered
weapons
based
on
naturally
occurring
poisons,
known
as
toxins,
however
produced.
As
with
chemical
weapons,
actual
employment
of
biological
weapons
was
outlawed
by
the
1925
Geneva
Protocol.
At
the
time
of
their
destruction
in
accordance
with
presidential
directives
of
1969
and
1970,
the
biological
weapons
of
the
United
States
(the
only
country
for
which
authenticated
information
was
available)
included
dry-powder
or
liquid-slurry
formulations
of
the
microbes
that
cause
tularemia,
Q
fever,
Venezuelan
equine
encephalitis,
rice
blast,
and
stem
rust
of
wheat.
They
also
included
a
number
of
toxins,
such
as
paralytic
shellfish
poison.
A
variety
of
dispensers,
both
large
and
small,
was
also
on
hand.
Biological
weapons
designed
to
dispense
airborne
clouds
of
pathogenic
microbes
could
in
theory
kill
or
incapacitate
unprotected
populations
over
very
large
areas.
Such
weapons
were
never
used.
The
first
and
most
important
line
of
defense
against
chemical
warfare
agents
(also
needed
for
protection
against
radioactive
fallout)
was
the
individual
protection
provided
by
masks
and
protective
clothing,
and
the
collective
protection
of
combat
vehicles
and
mobile
or
fixed
shelters.
Filters
for
masks
and
shelters
contained
specially
treated
activated
charcoal
to
remove
vapours,
and
paper
membranes
or
other
materials
to
remove
particles.
Such
filters
typically
could
reduce
the
concentration
of
chemical
(and
biological)
warfare
agents
by
a
factor
of
at
least
100,000.
Masks
could
be
donned
in
less
than
10
seconds
and
could
be
worn
for
long
periods,
even
in
sleep.
Modern
protective
overgarments
were
made
of
fabric
containing
activated
charcoal
or
other
adsorptive
forms
of
carbon.
A
complete
suit
typically
weighed
about
four
pounds
(two
kilograms).
The
fabric
could
breathe
and
pass
water-vapour
perspiration.
In
warm
weather,
periods
of
heavy
exertion
in
full
protective
gear
would
have
to
be
limited
in
order
to
avoid
heat
stress,
or
else
protection
would
have
to
be
partly
relaxed,
as
by
partially
opening
the
protective
jacket.
Under
common
European
conditions,
military
units
routinely
exercised
at
or
near
full
protection
for
several
days
continuously.
(see
also
Index:
gas
mask,
filtration)
Other
items
for
chemical
defense
were
detectors
and
alarms
sensitive
to
nerve
and
blister
agents,
prophylactic
and
antidote
drugs
that
would
provide
partial
protection
against
nerve
agents,
and
equipment
for
decontaminating
people
and
equipment.
The
effectiveness
of
chemical
weapons
against
prepared
forces
would
depend
more
on
the
interference
with
fighting
performance
imposed
by
wearing
protective
equipment
and
taking
other
precautions
than
on
direct
casualties.
The
extent
of
such
interference,
and
hence
the
military
value
of
chemicals
in
comparison
with
other
weapons,
was
difficult
to
assess.
Estimates,
based
on
controlled
field
exercises,
of
the
reduction
in
performance
in
military
units
under
chemical
attack
ranged
from
near
zero
to
more
than
30
percent,
depending
on
the
mission
and
the
conditions
of
the
exercise.
Toxic
smokes
and
other
toxic
substances
were
used
occasionally
in
war
from
ancient
times,
but
the
earliest
large-scale
use
of
chemical
warfare
agents
was
in
World
War
I.
Preceded
by
both
sides'
sporadic
use
of
various
tear
gases
in
artillery
and
other
projectiles
starting
in
1914,
it
was
the
German
attack
with
chlorine
released
from
thousands
of
cylinders
along
a
four-mile
(six-kilometre)
front
at
Ypres
on
April
22,
1915,
that
initiated
the
massive
use
of
chemicals
in
that
conflict.
The
wind-borne
cloud
totally
broke
the
lines
of
the
unprepared
French
Territorial
and
Algerian
units
in
its
path,
but
the
attackers
failed
to
exploit
the
opportunity.
Although
numerous
chlorine
gas-cloud
attacks
were
subsequently
carried
out
by
both
sides,
they
accomplished
little,
owing
to
the
introduction
of
gas
masks
and
other
protective
measures.
(see
also
Index:
Ypres,
Battles
of)
As
other
gases
and
more
effective
delivery
methods
were
introduced,
so
too
were
improved
defenses.
Notable
among
offensive
improvements
were
respiratory
agents
more
poisonous
than
chlorine,
such
as
phosgene,
and
chemicals
that
blistered
the
skin
and
attacked
the
eyes,
especially
mustard
gas.
The
defense
kept
pace,
with
the
introduction
of
better
gas
masks,
protective
clothing,
and
battlefield
tactics
for
minimizing
exposure.
More
than
100,000
tons
of
various
chemical
warfare
agents
were
used
in
World
War
I;
but
gas
was
an
unimportant
weapon
in
overall
military
terms,
largely
because
of
the
effectiveness
of
defenses
against
it.
In
World
War
II,
chemical
weapons
were
stockpiled
by
both
sides,
but
they
were
not
used
and
were
not
integrated
into
military
planning.
Records
indicated
various
reasons
for
this:
(1)
military
opinion
that
chemical
weapons
would
be
no
more
effective
than
conventional
weapons
and
would
complicate
and
delay
operations,
(2)
fear
of
retaliation,
especially
against
civilian
centres,
and
(3)
aversion
to
gas
warfare
by
political
and
military
leaders,
reflecting
the
proscriptions
of
the
Geneva
Protocol.
Chemical
weapons
were
used
in
only
a
few
of
the
more
than
200
wars
fought
after
World
War
I.
In
each
case--as
in
Ethiopia
(1935-36),
China
(1938-42),
the
Yemen
(1966-67),
and
Iraq-Iran
(1984-88)--chemicals
were
used
against
forces
initially
lacking
gas
masks.
Chemical
warfare
agents
are
substances,
whether
gaseous,
liquid,
or
solid,
intended
for
use
in
warfare
because
of
their
direct
toxic
effects
on
people,
animals,
or
plants.
Worldwide
revulsion
toward
chemical
weapons
is
embodied
in
the
Geneva
Protocol
of
1925,
prohibiting
"the
use
in
war
of
asphyxiating,
poisonous
or
other
gases,
and
of
all
analogous
liquids,
materials
or
devices."
More
than
140
states,
including
all
major
nations,
are
parties
to
the
Protocol
of
1925.
Biotoxins
can
be
conveniently
grouped
into
three
major
categories:
(1)
microbial
toxins,
poisons
produced
by
bacteria,
blue-green
algae,
dinoflagellates,
golden-brown
algae,
etc.,
(2)
phytotoxins,
poisons
produced
by
plants,
and
(3)
zootoxins,
poisons
produced
by
animals.
The
geographic
distribution
of
poisonous
organisms
varies
greatly;
poison-producing
microorganisms
tend
to
be
ubiquitous
in
their
distribution.
Poisonous
plants
and
animals
are
found
in
greatest
abundance
and
varieties
in
warm-temperate
and
tropical
regions.
Relatively
few
toxic
organisms
of
any
kind
are
found
in
polar
latitudes.Knowledge
of
the
evolutionary
significance
and
development
of
most
biotoxins
is
largely
speculative
and
poorly
understood.
In
some
instances
they
may
have
developed
during
the
evolution
of
certain
animal
species
as
part
of
the
food
procurement
mechanism
(e.g.,
in
snakes;
cnidarians,
jellyfishes,
and
their
relatives;
mollusks,
octopuses,
and
others;
and
spiders).
Biotoxins
may
also
function
as
defensive
mechanisms,
as
in
some
snakes,
fishes,
arthropods
(e.g.,
insects,
millipedes),
and
others.
The
defense
may
be
quite
complex--as
in
the
protection
of
territorial
rights
for
reproductive
purposes--and
inhibitory
or
antibiotic
substances
may
be
produced
that
result
in
the
exclusion
of
competitive
animal
or
plant
species.
Certain
marine
organisms
and
terrestrial
plants
may
release
into
the
water,
air,
or
soil
inhibitory
substances
that
discourage
the
growth
of
other
organisms;
well-known
examples
include
the
production
of
antibiotic
substances
by
microorganisms.
Similar
chemical-warfare
mechanisms
are
used
in
battles
for
territorial
rights
among
the
inhabitants
of
a
coral
reef,
a
field,
or
a
forest.
Thus
biotoxins
play
important
roles
in
the
regulation
of
natural
populations.
Of
increasing
interest
has
been
the
discovery
that
certain
substances,
which
may
be
toxic
to
one
group
of
organisms,
may
serve
a
vital
function
in
the
life
processes
of
the
source
organism.
The
availability
of
radioactive
isotopes
provided
the
technology
necessary
for
understanding
how
molecules
are
transported
across
biological
membranes,
which
are
the
very
thin
boundaries
of
living
cells;
the
environment
maintained
by
membranes
in
cells
differs
from
the
external
environment
and
permits
cellular
function.
The
Danish
physiologist
August
Krogh
laid
the
groundwork
in
this
subject;
his
pupil,
Hans
Ussing,
developed
the
conceptual
means
by
which
the
transport
of
ions
(charged
atoms)
across
membranes
can
be
identified.
Ussing's
definition
of
active
transport
made
possible
an
understanding,
at
the
cellular
level,
of
the
way
in
which
ions
and
water
are
pumped
into
and
out
of
living
cells
in
order
to
regulate
the
ionic
composition
and
water
balance
in
cells,
organs,
and
organisms.
The
molecular
mechanism
by
which
these
processes
occur,
however,
remains
to
be
discovered.
In
addition
to
the
function
of
transport,
membranes
also
are
utilized
as
templates
on
which
such
molecules
as
enzymes,
which
must
function
in
a
sequential
fashion,
can
be
kept
in
the
requisite
order.
Although
great
progress
has
been
made
in
understanding
the
mechanisms
by
which
specific
atoms
are
assembled
into
large
biological
molecules,
the
principles
involved
in
the
assembly
of
molecules
into
membranes,
which
are
organized
structures
of
a
higher
degree
of
complexity
than
large
molecules,
are
not
yet
very
well
understood.
There
is
reason
to
believe
that
the
incorporation
of
a
molecule
into
a
membrane
endows
it
with
properties
that
differ
from
those
of
a
molecule
in
solution.
A
primary
task
of
biophysics
is
to
understand
the
physical
character
of
these
cooperative
interactions
that
are
essential
to
life.
Breathing
device
designed
to
protect
the
wearer
against
harmful
substances
in
the
air.
The
typical
gas
mask
consists
of
a
tight-fitting
facepiece
that
contains
filters,
an
exhalation
valve,
and
transparent
eyepieces.
It
is
held
to
the
face
by
straps
and
can
be
worn
in
association
with
a
protective
hood.
The
filter
elements
in
the
cheeks
of
the
mask
remove
contaminants
from
the
air
that
is
drawn
through
the
mask
by
the
wearer's
inhaling.
The
filters,
which
can
be
replaced,
clean
the
air
but
do
not
add
oxygen
to
it
(some
masks
are
connected
by
a
hose
to
a
separate
tank
of
oxygen).
The
most
common
filters
employ
fibre
screens
(to
strain
out
finely
divided
solid
particles)
and
chemical
compounds
such
as
charcoal
(to
capture
or
chemically
alter
poisonous
gases
in
the
air).
Charcoal
absorbs
and
holds
a
fairly
large
volume
of
poisonous
gases.Gas
masks
are
widely
used
by
the
world's
armed
forces.
Although
it
is
possible
to
design
filtering
devices
that
will
neutralize
almost
any
specific
toxic
substance
in
the
air,
it
is
impossible
to
combine
in
one
mask
protection
against
all
toxic
substances.
Military
gas
masks
are
accordingly
constructed
with
a
view
to
counteracting
those
chemicals
that
are
thought
most
likely
to
be
used
in
wartime.
Gas
masks
are
effective
only
against
those
chemical-warfare
agents
that
are
dispersed
as
true
gases
and
are
injurious
when
breathed.
Agents
such
as
mustard
gas
that
are
dispersed
in
liquid
form
and
attack
the
body
through
the
skin
surface
necessitate
the
use
of
special
protective
clothing
in
addition
to
gas
masks.
An
instrument
used
in
combat
for
the
purpose
of
killing,
injuring,
or
defeating
an
enemy.
A
weapon
may
be
a
shock
weapon,
held
in
the
hands,
such
as
the
club,
mace,
or
sword.
It
may
also
be
a
missile
weapon,
operated
by
muscle
power
(as
with
the
javelin,
sling,
and
bow
and
arrow),
mechanical
power
(as
with
the
crossbow
and
catapult),
or
chemical
power
(as
with
the
rocket
and
missile
and
such
guns
as
the
cannon,
rifle,
and
pistol).
Weapons
may
also
be
classified
as
conventional,
destroying
by
kinetic
energy
(as
with
the
bullet)
or
by
chemical
energy
(as
with
the
bomb
and
grenade).
The
nonconventional
category
comprises
nuclear
weapons,
such
as
the
atomic
bomb
and
thermonuclear
bomb,
as
well
as
weapons
of
chemical
warfare
and
biological
warfare.
All
the
aforementioned
are
offensive
weapons,
but
such
defensive
measures
as
fortification,
armour,
and
the
helmet
have
also
been
considered
weapons.For
some
basic
motives
such
as
hunger,
thirst,
and
sex,
a
biological
approach
emphasizing
regulatory
mechanisms
has
dominated
the
thinking
of
researchers.
The
fundamental
premise
has
been
that
such
basic
motives
are
homeostatically
regulated--that
is,
the
nervous
system
monitors
levels
of
energy,
fluid
balance,
and
hormone
production
(in
the
case
of
sex)
and
alters
motivation
when
these
levels
deviate
too
far
from
some
optimum
level.As
was
mentioned
earlier,
the
study
of
the
relationships
of
living
things
to
each
other
and
to
their
environment
is
known
as
ecology.
Because
these
interrelationships
are
so
important
to
the
welfare
of
Earth
and
because
they
can
be
seriously
disrupted
by
man's
activities,
ecology
is
becoming
one
of
the
most
important
branches
of
biology.
Latest
News
by
Chronological
Date
Below
The
Threat
of
A
Israel
&
Iran
Nuclear
War
-------------------------October
19,
2004
-------------------------
OCTOBER
2004:
The
recent
developments
in
the
Middle
East
are
growing
into
a
volatile
scenario
which
could
erupt
into
a
global
war
within
the
next
three
years.
The
recent
completion
of
Iran's
Russian
Designed
Nuclear
Plant
has
raised
the
level
of
more
conflicts
in
the
Middle
East.
The
first
Arab
Nation
with
a
nuclear
plant
has
also
raised
global
concerns,
especially
in
Israel.
In
1981
Israel
launched
an
air
attack
against
Iraq's
nuclear
reactor
and
destroyed
it
before
Suddam
Hussein
had
the
chance
to
build
nuclear
weapons,
and
it
seems
Israel
was
right
in
doing
so,
due
to
Saddam"s
reign
of
terror
and
his
past
history
of
using
biological
weapons
against
his
own
people,
mainly
the
Kurds
in
northern
Iraq
after
the
US-Iraq
war
of
the
early
1990s.
Saddam
began
launching
scud
missiles
against
Israel,
hoping
that
other
Arab
Nations
would
join
Saddam
in
the
destruction
of
Israel.
Israel
maintained
it's
composure
with
great
restraint
and
refrained
from
any
retaliatory
missile
strikes
against
Iraq,
mainly
due
to
political
pressure
from
the
American
and
Europe
coalition
troops
that
were
involved
in
the
Iraq
war,
known
as
Desert
Storm.
The
Israeli
nuclear
weapons
program
grew
out
of
the
conviction
that
the
Holocaust
justified
any
measures
Israel
took
to
ensure
its
survival.
Consequently,
Israel
has
been
actively
investigating
the
nuclear
option
from
its
earliest
days.
The
program
took
another
step
forward
with
the
creation
of
the
Israel
Atomic
Energy
Commission
(IAEC)
in
1952.
Its
chairman,
Ernst
David
Bergmann,
had
long
advocated
an
Israeli
bomb
as
the
best
way
to
ensure
"that
we
shall
never
again
be
led
as
lambs
to
the
slaughter."
The
United
States
first
became
aware
of
Israel's
nuclear
facility's
existence
after
U-2
over
flights
in
1958
captured
the
facility's
construction,
but
it
was
not
identified
as
a
nuclear
site
until
two
years
later.
The
complex
was
variously
explained
as
a
textile
plant,
an
agricultural
station,
and
a
metallurgical
research
facility,
until
Israel
stated
in
December
1960
that
it's
complex
was
a
nuclear
research
center
built
for
"peaceful
purposes."
This
is
an
exact
echo
of
Iran's
explanation
of
it's
current
nuclear
plant.
In
early
1968,
the
CIA
issued
a
report
concluding
that
Israel
had
successfully
started
production
of
uclear
weapons.
This
estimate,
however,
was
based
on
an
informal
conversation
between
Carl
Duckett,
head
of
the
CIA's
Office
of
Science
and
Technology,
and
Edward
Teller,
father
of
the
hydrogen
bomb.
Teller
said
that,
based
on
conversations
with
friends
in
the
Israeli
scientific
and
defense
establishment,
he
had
concluded
that
Israel
was
capable
of
building
the
bomb.
By
the
late
1990s
the
U.S.
Intelligence
Community
estimated
that
Israel
possessed
between
75-130
weapons,
based
on
production
estimates.
The
stockpile
would
certainly
include
warheads
for
mobile
missile
launchers,
as
well
as
bombs
for
Israeli
aircraft.
One
Israeli
commentator
recommended
that
Israel
should
signal
Iraq
that
“any
Iraqi
action
against
Israeli
civilian
populations,
with
or
without
gas,
may
leave
Iraq
without
Baghdad
which
emplied
Israel
would
use
and
launch
nuclear
weapons
againt
Iraq.
By
analysisng
the
past
military
of
the
Israeli-Arab
conflict,
the
Iran
nuclear
plant
brings
back
the
possibliity
of
a
near
future
war
where
nuclear
weapons
will
be
used.
It
would
be
a
reasonable
assumption
that
The
United
States
would
intervene
in
any
Israel
an
Arab
conflict,
and
that
the
Russians
would
no
doubt
intervene
and
help
Iran
to
defend
itself
from
a
Israel
nuclear
attack.
The
Arab
nations
as
well
would
be
allies
of
Iran
and
European
nations
may
be
split
on
whom
they
would
show
allegence
to.
Iran
may
be
forced
into
a
posistion
to
manufacture
nuclear
weapons
in
order
to
use
as
a
deterant
of
a
nuclear
strike
as
it's
global
location
is
a
virtual
atomic
zone.
Iran
borders
with
Pakistan
which
is
now
a
nuclear
threat,
India
borders
Pakistan
and
India
is
a
nuclear
threat.
Other
nations
with
the
capabilities
of
a
short
launched
nuclear
weapon
include
Russia,
China,
France,
and
The
United
Kingdom.
The
United
States
can
launch
a
nuclear
attack
on
any
nation
in
the
world,
and
the
US
has
proven
it
will
use
nuclear
weapons
as
demonstrated
in
the
atomic
bombings
of
Hiroshima
and
Nagasaki
in
World
War
II
in
which
over
150,000
human
civilians
were
killed
instantly.
The
possible
closure
of
this
upcoming
war
mirrors
the
remarks
of
the
1981
Prime
Minister
of
Israel,
Menachem
Begin.
Menachem
Begin,
who
was
a
survivor
of
the
World
War
II
Holocaust,
viewed
the
Iraq
reactor
as
a
technologically
advanced
version
of
the
Final
Solution.
Begin's
decision
to
destroy
the
Iraq
reactor
told
the
world
that
there
would
be
no
nuclear
holocaust
involving
Israel
in
the
Twentieth
Century,
and
the
former
Prime
Minister
was
proven
to
be
right.
Below
is
a
composed
and
brief
history
of
the
Israel
and
Arab
conflict.
---------------Iran
Completes
Nuclear
Plant's
Construction
--------------------------------
On
October
14,2004
Russia
and
Iran
said
they
had
finished
construction
of
an
atomic
power
plant
in
the
Islamic
Republic,
a
project
the
United
States
fears
Tehran
could
use
to
make
nuclear
arms.
Alaeddin
Boroujerdi,
head
of
the
Iranian
Parliament's
Foreign
Affairs
and
National
Security
Commission,
confirmed
the
construction
phase
at
Bushehr.
Iran
says
it
will
reject
any
proposal
for
a
complete
halt
to
such
activities
as
its
uranium
enrichment
programme
even
if
The
UK,
France
and
Germany
present
a
package
aimed
at
convincing
Tehran
to
give
up
nuclear
ambitions.
Iran
repeated
it
had
a
"right"
to
master
the
sensitive
nuclear
fuel
cycle,
ahead
of
an
expected
proposal
from
Europe
calling
for
Tehran
to
abandon
such
work
in
exchange
for
diplomatic
and
trade
incentives.
"So
far
we
have
not
yet
received
the
European
proposals.
But
they
will
be
acceptable
if
they
respect
our
national
interests
and
recognize
our
legitimate
right
to
the
civil
nuclear
technology,
especially
the
nuclear
fuel
cycle,"
Iranian
Foreign
Ministry
spokesman
Hamid
Reza
Asefi
told
reporters.
"Our
right
is
not
negotiable,
but
we
will
obtain
our
right
through
negotiation
and
dialogue,"
he
added
By
mastering
the
fuel
cycle,
Iran
could
gain
the
"option"
of
developing
nuclear
arms.
Enriched
uranium,
depending
on
its
level
of
purity,
could
be
used
for
both
power
plants
and
the
core
of
a
warhead.
The
Russian
built
nuclear
reactor
in
the
Iranian
city
of
Bushehr,
is
set
to
be
launched
in
2005.
The
French
Foreign
Ministry
said
France
and
its
G-8
partners
should
call
for
a
complete
suspension
by
Iran
of
its
advanced
uranium
enrichment
program.
"Time
is
of
the
essence.
France
will
continue
to
work
with
its
partners
and
the
Iranian
authorities
toward
the
complete
suspension
by
Iran
of
its
enrichment
and
reprocessing
activities,"
the
ministry
said
in
a
press
statement.
The
director
general
of
the
International
Atomic
Energy
Agency
(IAEA),
Mohamed
ElBaradei,
reported
to
the
board
of
governors
on
September
1,
2004,
that
Iran
intended
to
convert
37
metric
tons
of
yellowcake
into
uranium
hexafluoride,
the
"feed"
material
that
is
enriched
in
gas
centrifuges.
It
was
a
surprising
revelation
as
37
metric
tons
is
a
small
quantity
for
a
civilian
nuclear
power
program.
But
it
would
be
a
large
amount
for
a
fledgling
nuclear
weapons
program,
enough
material
to
make
roughly
five
crude
nuclear
weapons.
Iranian
officials
reportedly
added
they
would
likely
start
enriching
uranium
in
fall
2004.
Questions
remain
about
whether
Iran
has
conducted
activities
to
research,
test,
and
produce
a
nuclear
weapon
itself,
a
process
called
nuclear
weaponization.
Although
the
U.S.
government
and
Israel
have
stated
for
years
that
Iran
has
a
nuclear
weapons
program,
they
have
not
provided
the
IAEA
or
the
public
with
the
location
of
any
nuclear
weaponization
sites
or
any
direct
evidence
of
such
activities.
One
theory
is
that
the
Khan
network,
which
supplied
both
Libya's
and
Iran's
gas
centrifuge
program,
supplied
Iran
with
a
weapon
design.
The
design
supplied
to
Libya
appears
to
be
for
a
Chinese
warhead
that
was
tested
on
a
missile
in
the
mid-1960s
and
provided
to
Pakistan
in
the
early
1980s.
If
Iran
received
this
information,
it
would
have
been
able
to
short-circuit
the
difficult
process
of
developing
a
deliverable
nuclear
warhead.
If
it
received
the
designs
several
years
ago,
Iran
could
have
already
finished
all
the
necessary
research
and
development
for
a
nuclear
warhead,
and
perhaps
even
stockpiled
key
components.
In
early
June
2004,
ABC
News
received
information
about
Lavizan,
in
the
northeastern
section
of
Tehran.
ABC
asked
the
Institute
for
Science
and
International
Security
(ISIS)
for
help
in
assessing
the
information.
The
initial
information
suggested
the
site
was
involved
in
some
type
of
nuclear
weaponization.
The
Lavizan
site
was
also
known
to
house
radiation
detection
devices
called
whole-body
counters,
which
Iran
procured
overseas
in
the
early
1990s
under
false
pretenses.
The
Iranians
described
Lavizan
as
owned
by
the
Military
Industrialization
Organization
but
a
September
2004
report
says
that
Iran
had
declared
the
site
as
a
place
to
study
"preparedness
to
combat
and
neutralization
of
casualties
due
to
nuclear
attacks
and
accidents
and
also
support
and
provide
scientific
advice
and
services
to
the
Ministry
of
Defense.
The
presence
of
this
site
has
increased
suspicion
that
the
site
might
be
involved
in
researching
nuclear
weapons.
One
Israeli
intelligence
report,
a
portion
of
which
was
leaked
to
the
media,
claims
that
Iran
could
obtain
it's
first
nuclear
weapon
by
early
2007.
The
U.S.
intelligence
community
assessment
is
reportedly
that
Iran
could
have
a
nuclear
weapon
in
three
to
five
years.
Two
years
have
passed
since
secret
Iranian
nuclear
sites
were
first
brought
to
public
attention,
and
Iran
appears
unwilling
to
abandon
its
fissile
material
production
programs.
Iran
has
too
often
dictated
the
pace
of
diplomatic
progress,
giving
the
impression
that
it
is
playing
for
time.
In
the
next
one
or
two
years,
Iran
could
build
up
unstoppable
institutional
and
public
momentum
to
finish
and
operate
its
enrichment
plant
or
a
heavy-water
reactor
and
outlast
the
current
international
diplomatic
effort.
----China's
40th
Anniversary
of
Detonating
it's
First
Nuclear
Weapon
-------------------------------------------------
The
People's
Republic
of
China
joined
the
rank
of
nations
with
atomic
bomb
capability,
after
a
successful
nuclear
test
on
October
16,
1964.
China
was
the
fifth
member
of
this
exclusive
club,
joining
the
United
States,
the
Soviet
Union,
Great
Britain,
and
France.
American
officials
were
not
terribly
surprised
by
the
test;
intelligence
reports
since
the
1950s
indicated
that
China
was
working
to
develop
an
atomic
bomb,
possibly
aided
by
Soviet
technicians
and
scientists.
Nevertheless,
the
successful
test
did
cause
concern
in
the
U.S.
government.
During
the
early
1960s,
China
took
a
particularly
radical
stance
that
advocated
worldwide
revolution
against
the
forces
of
capitalism,
working
strenuously
to
extend
its
influence
in
Asia
and
the
new
nations
of
Africa.
The
test,
coming
just
two
months
after
the
Tonkin
Gulf
Resolution
(a
congressional
resolution
giving
President
Lyndon
B.
Johnson
the
power
to
respond
to
communist
aggression
in
Vietnam)
created
a
frightening
specter
of
nuclear
confrontation
and
conflict
in
Southeast
Asia.
IRAN
SOON
TO
BE
A
NUCLEAR
POWER
------------------------------------------
Iranian
president
Mohammad
Khatami
says
"no
country
can
prevent
us"
from
enriching
uraniums.
-------------------------------------------------
OCTOBER
2004:
Iran
announced
the
success
of
a
miliatery
strategic
missile
test
and
declared
it's
ready
for
any
attack
from
a
hostile
threat.
The
Iranian
media
reported
that
the
missile
was
more
advanced
than
the
Shahab-3
missile.
This
new
missile
has
the
range
to
reach
targets
such
Israel
and
stationed
American
forces
in
The
Middle
East.
The
United
Nations
demanded
that
Iran
freeze
it's
uranium
enrichment
program.
Many
nations
believe
that
Iran's
uranium
program
will
be
used
for
manufacturing
of
atomic
weapons
while
Iran
claims
it's
uranium
program
is
being
developed
for
peaceful
purposes.
In
June
of
2004
Iran
warned
European
governments
they
might
regret
pandering
to
Tehran's
archfoe
Washington
by
submitting
a
strongly
critical
draft
resolution
on
Iran's
nuclear
programme
to
the
UN
watchdog.
Iran
maybe
only
one
to
three
years
away
from
being
able
to
make
nuclear
weapons,
and
a
growing
number
of
nuclear
experts
worry
that
there
may
be
no
way
to
stop
it
from
becoming
the
world's
10th
nuclear
weapons
state..Iran
is
a
theocratic
Islamic
republic
governed
under
the
constitution
of
1979,
as
revised
in
1989,
when
presidential
powers
were
expanded
and
the
post
of
prime
minister
eliminated.
Appointed,
rather
than
elected,
offices
and
bodies
hold
the
real
power
in
the
government.
The
supreme
leader,
who
effectively
serves
as
the
chief
of
state,
is
appointed
for
life
by
an
Islamic
religious
advisory
board.
------------------THE
MX
MISSILE
--------
--THE
MX
MISSILE
PROJECT
1979~1996
-Total
Yield
300
to
3000
Kilotons
per
Missile
A
MX
can
contain
5
to
10
multiple
300
kiloton
war
heads
1
kiloton
=
One
ton
(
2000
pounds
of
TNT
)
1
megaton
=
One
Million
(
2,000,000
pounds
of
TNT
)
JULY
2004;
In
1979
the
United
States
Air
Force
announced
plans
for
a
new
intercontinental
ballistic
missile
system
that
would
be
deployed
on
a
circular
railroad
track
so
that
more
than
200
missiles
could
be
moved
into
4,600
shelters
to
be
constructed
along
the
track.
The
MX
is
undoubtedly
a
major
factor
in
American
in
the
event
of
a
future
nuclear
war.
The
first
of
five
test
launches
were
held
in
January
1982.
In
the
MX
test
a
71
foot
long,
92
inch
diameter,
195,000
pound
missile,
without
propellants,
was
thrust
more
than
300
feet
into
the
air
at
a 5
degree
angle
and
nearly
100
feet
down
range
into
a
large
earthen
pit.
The
MX,
also
called
The
Peace
keeper
missile
is
America's
newest
intercontinental
ballistic
missile.
The
Peace
keeper
(designated
LGM-118A)
is
a
four
stage
intercontinental
ballistic
missile
capable
of
carrying
up
to
ten
independently
targetable
reentry
vehicles
with
greater
accuracy
than
any
other
ballistic
missile.
Its
design
combines
advanced
technology
in
fuels,
guidance,
nozzle
design,
and
motor
construction
with
protection
against
the
hostile
nuclear
environment
associated
with
land
based
systems.
The
Peacekeeper
is
a
three
stage
rocket
ICBM
system
consisting
of
three
major
sections:
the
boost
system,
the
post
boost
vehicle
system
and
the
re-entry
system.
The
post
boost
vehicle
also
employed
a
self
contained
inertial
navigation
system
that
allowed
the
missile
to
operate
independent
of
ground
reference
or
commands
during
flight.
The
top
section
of
the
Peacekeeper
is
the
re-entry
system.
It
consists
of
the
deployment
module,
up
to
10
cone
shaped
re-entry
vehicles
and
a
protective
shroud.
The
shroud
protects
the
re-entry
vehicles
during
ascent.
It
is
topped
with
a
nose
cap,
containing
a
rocket
motor
to
separate
it
from
the
deployment
module.
Each
deployed
re-entry
vehicle
follows
a
ballistic
path
to
its
target.
President
Carter
made
his
12
June
1979
decision
to
proceed
with
full
scale
engineering
development
of
the
Missile-X.
The
President
augmented
this
decision
on
7
September
1979
and
full
scale
engineering
development
began
one
week
later.
In
the
1980s
President
Reagan
instructed
the
Air
Force
to
conduct
a
technical
assessment
to
deploy
an
ICBM
quickly
as
a
demonstration
of
national
resolve
to
preserve
deterrence
and
the
United
States
global
nuclear
supremacy
and
it's
capability
to
launch
a
full
nuclear
strike
of
mass
destruction
against
any
threat
to
American
security.
The
Air
Force
successfully
conducted
the
first
test
flight
of
the
Peacekeeper
June
17,
1983,
from
Vandenberg
Air
Force
Base,
Calif.
The
missile
traveled
4,190
miles
(6,704
kilometers)
before
dropping
six
unarmed
test
re-entry
vehicles
on
planned
target
sites
in
the
Kwajalein
Missile
Test
Range
in
the
Pacific
Ocean.
The
first
two
test
phases
consisted
of
12
test
flights
to
ensure
the
Peacekeeper's
subsystems
performed
as
planned,
and
to
make
final
assessments
of
its
range
and
payload
capability.
Peacekeeper
production
began
in
February
1984
with
the
production
of
50
MX
missiles.
The
second
increment
of
50
MX
missiles
would
replace
Minuteman
IIIs
missiles
belonging
to
the
319th
Strategic
Missile
Squadron.
The
completion
date
of
the
deployment
was
scheduled
for
December
1989.
Under
the
rail
garrison
plan
concept,
the
Peacekeeper
missiles
would
be
placed
on
trains
stationed
at
various
U.S.
Air
Force
installations.
The
25
trains,
each
carrying
two
missiles,
would
deploy
off
base
and
onto
the
national
railroad
network
during
periods
of
international
tension
to
improve
survivability.
In
February
1987,
the
Air
Force
selected
ten
additional
bases
as
candidate
rail
garrison
locations.
That
same
year,
Congress
appropriated
$350
million
to
fund
rail
garrison
research
and
development.
Exercises
conducted
in
1988
tested
and
refined
the
concept
of
operations,
and
in
May
the
Secretary
of
Defense
authorized
the
Air
Force
to
proceed
with
Peacekeeper
Rail
Garrison
full
scale
development.
The
Air
Force
achieved
initial
operational
capability
of
10
deployed
Peacekeepers
at
F.E.
Warren
AFB,
Wyo.,
in
December
1986.
Full
operational
capability
was
achieved
in
December
1988
with
the
establishment
of
a
squadron
of
50
missiles.
The
specifications
of
the
MX-Peacekeeper
Missile
are;
Name;
The
MX
Intercontinental
ballistic
missile
Length:
71
feet
Weight:
195,000
pounds
Diameter:
7
feet,
8
inches
Range:
Greater
than
6,000
miles
Speed:
Approximately
15,000
miles
per
hour
Warheads:
10
Avco
MK
21
re-entry
vehicle
nuclear
war
heads
Yield:
300
to
3,000
Kilotons
depending
on
individual
war
heads
per
missile
Unit
Cost:
$70
million
There
are
two
types
of
nuclear
reactions
which
are
used
in
nuclear
weapons.
The
nucleus
of
some
heavy
elements
like
Uranium
or
Plutonium
can
split
into
two
roughly
equal
sized
nuclei
with
the
release
of
energy.
Such
a
process
is
known
as
nuclear
fission.
The
fission
reaction
can
occur
spontaneously
in
the
fissile
material.
The
reaction
is
also
self
sustaining.
Namely
the
fission
of
one
nucleus
induces
the
fission
of
nearby
ones
and
so
on,
leading
to
what
is
called
a
chain
reaction.
If
a
sufficient
amount
of
fissile
material
is
concentrated
in
one
place
then
the
chain
reaction
proceeds
very
fast
leading
to
an
explosion.
On
the
other
hand
certain
very
light
elements
like
isotopes
of
hydrogen
undergo
nuclear
fusion.
In
this
process,
two
light
nuclei
can
combine
to
form
a
single
nucleus
with
the
release
of
energy.
This
is
the
process
by
which
energy
is
generated
in
the
core
of
the
sun
and
other
stars.
The
fusion
reaction
requires
very
high
temperatures
and
density
before
it
can
get
initiated.
All
nuclear
weapons
use
these
two
reactions
in
different
ways.
From
the
military
usage
point
of
view,
they
are
classified
as
either
tactical
weapons
or
strategic
weapons.
Tactical
weapons
are
low
yield
weapons
that
meant
to
be
used
in
the
battlefield
against
military
formations.
Strategic
weapons
are
high
yield
weapons
to
be
used
against
civilian
populations
in
big
cities.
Thermonuclear
Weapons,
The
Neutron
Bomb,
The
Doomsday
Bomb
Thermonuclear
weapons,
also
called
hydrogen
bombs,
get
most
of
their
yield
from
the
fusion
reaction.
As
in
the
case
of
boosted
fission
weapons,
they
require
a
fission
explosion
to
trigger
fusion,
called
the
primary
stage,
to
initiate
the
fusion
reaction
which
is
called
the
secondary
stage.
However
unlike
the
boosted
weapons,
thermonuclear
weapons
contain
a
substantial
amount
of
fusion
fuel
and
most
of
their
yield
comes
from
fusion.
Indeed
these
are
the
most
powerful
of
nuclear
weapons,
often
with
yields
of
a
few
megatons.
A
third
fission
stage
can
also
be
added
to
produce
very
high
yield
weapons.
The
most
powerful
nuclear
weapon
to
have
been
tested
so
far
is
the
Tsar
Bomba,
a
50
megaton
three
stage
weapon
exploded
by
the
USSR
on
30th
October
1961.
Enhanced
radiation
weapons,
also
called
neutron
bombs
are
small
tactical
thermonuclear
weapons
which
are
designed
to
produce
intense
nuclear
radiation.
These
weapons
are
designed
to
kill
soldiers
protected
by
armour
(eg.
inside
tanks).
The
radiation
produced
by
the
neutron
bombs
can
easily
penetrate
the
armour
of
the
tanks
and
kill
the
humans
inside
them.
Salted
Nuclear
Weapons,
or
cobalt
bombs,
are
thermonuclear
weapons
which
are
designed
to
produce
a
large
amount
of
long
lasting
radioactive
fallout.
This
would
result
in
large
scale
radioactive
contamination
of
the
area
they
are
dropped
in.
The
difference
between
the
fallout
from
the
salted
weapons
and
the
unsalted
one
is
that
the
former
is
much
more
in
quantity
and
also
has
a
much
longer
lifetime.
The
fallout
remains
radioactive
for
much
longer.
The
long
term
effects
of
such
weapons
would
therefore
be
much
worse.
These
weapons
are
called
Doomsday
Devices
since
they
could
possibly
kill
everyone
on
earth.
The
energy
of
a
nuclear
explosion
is
released
in
a
number
of
different
ways,
all
of
which
are
lethal
which
is
putting
it
mildly
to
say
the
least.
The
magnitude
of
the
nuclear
blast
effect
(
generally
measured
in
pounds
per
square
inch
)
diminishes
with
distance
from
the
center
of
the
explosion.
A
burst
on
the
surface
produces
the
greatest
over
pressure
at
very
close
ranges
(which
is
why
surface
bursts
are
used
to
attack
very
hard,
very
small
targets
such
as
missile
silos),
but
less
over
pressure
than
an
air
burst
at
somewhat
longer
ranges.
Raising
the
height
of
the
burst
reduces
the
over
pressure
directly
under
the
bomb,
but
widens
the
area
at
which
a
given
smaller
over
pressure
is
produced.
Thus,
an
attack
on
factories
with
a
1-Mt
weapon
might
use
an
air
burst
at
an
altitude
of
8,000
feet
[2,400
m],
which
would
maximize
the
area
(about
28
mi2
[7,200
hectares])
that
would
receive
10
psi
or
more
of
over
pressure.
Nuclear
weapons
inflict
ionizing
radiation
on
people,
animals,
and
plants
in
two
different
ways.
Direct
radiation
occurs
at
the
time
of
the
explosion;
it
can
be
very
intense,
but
its
range
is
limited.
Fallout
radiation
is
received
from
particles
that
are
made
radioactive
by
the
effects
of
the
explosion,
and
subsequently
distributed
at
varying
distances
from
the
site
of
the
blast.
Direct
radiation
did
substantial
damage
to
the
residents
of
Hiroshima
and
Nagasaki.in
WWII
when
the
first
atom
bombs
were
detonated.
These
two
nuclear
bombs
were
named
Little
Boy
and
Fat
Man.
The
death
toll
of
these
explosions
exceeded
150,000.
Approximately
35
percent
of
the
energy
from
a
nuclear
explosion
is
an
intense
burst
of
thermal
radiation
heat.
The
effects
are
roughly
analogous
to
the
effect
of
a 2
second
flash
from
an
enormous
sun
lamp.
Since
the
thermal
radiation
travels
at
the
speed
of
light
(actually
a
bit
slower,
since
it
is
deflected
by
particles
in
the
atmosphere),
the
flash
of
light
and
heat
precedes
the
blast
wave
by
several
seconds,
just
as
lightning
is
seen
before
the
thunder
is
heard.
Electromagnetic
pulse
(EMP)
is
an
electro-magnetic
wave
similar
to
radio
waves,
which
results
from
secondary
reactions
occurring
when
the
nuclear
gamma
radiation
is
absorbed
in
the
air
or
ground.
It
is
similar
to
the
electrical
signal
from
lightning,
but
the
rise
in
voltage
is
typically
a
hundred
times
faster.
This
means
that
most
equipment
designed
to
protect
electrical
facilities
from
lightning
works
too
slowly
to
be
effective
against
EMP.
The
strength
of
an
EMP
will
destroy
or
damage
the
communications
and
electric
power
systems
of
the
intended
explosion
area.
SPACE
WEAPONS
DEPLOYMENT
-----------------------
JULY
2004:
The
June,
2004
death
of
former
United
States
president
Ronald
Reagan
was
not
the
death
of
his
STAR
WARS
Space
based
weapons
system.
The
political
and
military
view
of
STAR
WARS
was
deemed
that
it's
purpose
was
strictly
a
defensive
ploy
to
shoot
down
any
weapons
launched
against
the
United
States.
This
analyst
of
STAR
WARS
is
true
to
a
certain
degree
but
it's
major
objective
is
using
these
space
based
orbiting
satellites
to
attack
adversary
nations
from
space
by
destroying
their
key
elements
of
communications
and
infrastructure,
thus
causing
chaos
and
anarchy.
These
space
based
weapons
add
enormous
flexibility
with
their
targeting
capabilities
to
destroy
and
neutralize
any
nation
which
poses
a
threat
to
The
United
States.
Any
weapon
designed
under
the
guise
for
defensive
deployment
can
be
used
as
a
offensive
alternative
as
well.
Laser
Airborne
Optics
The
above
image
shows
a
engineer
making
adjustments
to
the
beam
control
optics
used
to
stabilize
and
shape
the
beam
from
the
oxygen
iodine
laser.
The
U.S.
Air
Force
Boeing
Airborne
Laser
(
the
ABI
)
is
designed
to
detect
launched
enemy
ballistic
missile
while
they
are
still
in
their
boost
phase.
The
laser
then
targets
the
missile
and
destroys
it
with
a
high
energy
chemical
oxygen
iodine
laser.
The
Lockheed
Martin
Space
Systems
division
in
Sunnyvale,
California
is
responsible
for
the
laser
systems.
The
fired
laser
beam
will
burn
a
hole
in
the
launched
missile's
outer
skin,
thus
rupturing
it's
fuel
tank
and
causing
the
missile
to
blow
up
while
in
flight.
The
essential
technology
for
the
laser
is
known
as
Adaptive
Optics.
BIG
BROTHER
&
LASER
WARFARE
-------- 
MARCH
2004;
Tactical
High
Energy
Laser
(THEL),
being
developed
by
the
U.S.
Army
in
a
joint
project
with
the
Government
of
Israel.
Laser
weapons
are
not
just
the
stuff
of
Buck
Rogers
any
more,
and
the
THEL
program
is
just
a
small
component
of
a
multi-billion
dollar
effort
by
the
U.S.
military
to
introduce
laser
weapons
to
the
battlefield.
Within
ten
years,
the
U.S.
military
plans
to
mount
powerful
laser
weapons
on
tanks,
Humvees,
fighter
jets,
and
other
aircraft.
Research
is
even
underway
to
develop
a
Humvee-mounted
non-lethal
microwave
energy
weapon
capable
of
incapacitating
people
by
causing
severe
pain.
If
these
efforts
are
successful,
energy
weapons
will
revolutionize
warfare
in
the
21st
century.
Lasers
are
used
widely
in
printers
and
CD-players.
They
are
used
to
perform
eye
surgery
or
to
cut
patterns
into
fabric
for
clothing.
Military
personnel,
law
enforcement,
and
sport
shooters
have
also
used
lasers
for
many
years
as
targeting
aids
for
weapons.
The
list
of
useful
applications
for
lasers
grows
every
day.
Laser
weapons
require
a
tremendous
input
of
energy,
ranging
from
tens
of
kilowatts
to
tens
of
megawatts.
The
U.S.
military
plans
to
develop
both
solid-state
and
chemical
lasers
into
weapon
systems.
Solid-state
lasers
pass
electricity
through
a
solid
medium
of
crystal
or
glass,
such
as
a
ruby
rod.
They
require
only
electrical
current
to
operate,
can
easily
be
reset
for
additional
firings,
and
are
relatively
inexpensive
to
fire.
If
technical
challenges
can
be
surmounted,
lasers
may
be
used
in
the
future
as
nearly
impenetrable
systems
to
interceptmissiles
or
as
terrifying
offensive
weapons.
It's
not
hard
to
imagine
their
potential
in
either
case.
Attacking
at
the
speed
of
light
(186,000
miles
per
hour),
lasers
will
be
nearly
impossible
to
dodge.The
Tactical
High
Energy
LaserNo
laser
weapon
system
has
achieved
greater
success
than
the
THEL.
The
THEL
mixes
deuterium
(a
form
of
hydrogen)
with
fluorine
to
create
deuterium
fluoride,
generating
an
intense
burst
of
infrared
radiation
in
the
process.
The
U.S.
military
is
currently
focusing
on
making
the
THEL
sytem
smaller
and
more
transportable
and
they
hope
to
deploy
a
mobile
version
of
the
THEL
(called
MTHEL)
by
2007.Northrop
rumman,
the
actual
developer
of
the
laser,
conducted
a
successful
test
firing
of
the
laser
last
year
at
118
percent
of
its
design
power.
The
laser
will
be
installed
in
the
turret
sometime
this
year.
The
team
plans
to
conduct
a
full-scale
ABL
test,
shooting
down
SCUD
missiles
in
flight,
sometime
by
the
end
of
2004.If
the
Pentagon
has
its
way,
energy
weapons
will
be
widespread
among
U.S.armed
forces
in
the
near
future.
U.S.
military
conflicts
have
become
material
for
prime-time
television,
so
in
as
little
as
ten
years,
television
viewers
worldwide
might
be
watching
as
directed
energy
weapons
see
combat
for
the
first
time.
Once
that
happens,
readers
and
writers
of
speculative
fiction
will
need
to
change
their
preconceived
notions
of
energy
weapons
garnered
from
stories.
More
importantly,
their
development
will
significantly
change
warfare
forever.
The
most
current
development
of
laser
weapons
are
plasma
lasers
in
which
the
amplifying
medium
is
a
rapidly
recombining
(supercooled
in
respect
to
free
electrons)
dense
plasma.
Efficient
amplification
of
visible
and
ultraviolet
radiation
is
possible
in
a
plasma
with
free-electron
density
Ne
=
10^13
-
10^18
cm^-3
and
an
electron
temperature
Te
=
0.05
- 2
eV.
In
layman
terms,
laser
warfare
may
surpass
nuclear
weapons
in
the
devastation
they
cause.
Libya's
Admits
Seeking
Weapons
2003
DECEMBER;
In
a
December
2003
report,
Libya's
Muammar
Qaddafi
admitted
seeking
biological
or
nuclear
weapons
and
has
ceased
activities
on
acquiring
these
weapons.
Qaddafi
has
now
even
opened
up
his
facilities
to
UN
inspectors
to
search
for
biological
elements
or
the
manufacturing
of
weapons
of
mass
destruction.
The
televised
December
13,
2003,
arrest
of
Saddam
Hussein,
who
was
seen
as
a
haggard
and
unclean
dictator,
and
caught
hiding
in
a
dirt
hollow,
may
have
helped.
Some
reports
have
echoed
that
this
had
brought
Qaddafi
to
his
knee's
knowing
that
rouge
nations
will
be
dealt
with
harshly
and
their
dictators
caught
and
eventually
executed
by
those
they
oppressed.
Britain's
Tony
Blair
and
US
President
G.
W.
Bush
may
now
argue
that
the
Iraq
war
will
help
stop
many
rouge
nations
from
developing
weapons,
if
not,
they
will
suffer
the
same
fate
as
Saddam
has.
Others
stated
that
Qaddafi
quit
his
WMD
program
to
lift
UN
sanctions
after
Libya
admitted
it's
role
in
the
1988
Pan
Am
airline
bombing
over
Lockerbie.
But
Libya
is
no
Iran
or
North
Korea.
Many
Arab
nations
have
asked
that
Israel
be
subjected
to
the
same
sanctions
as
other
Arab
nations
are.
Israel
has
possessed
a
large
nuclear
arsenal
since
the
1960s,
compliments
of
The
United
States.
The
difference
here
is
that
Israel
has
been
surrounded
by
Arab
nations
who
wish
Israel's
destruction,
thus
making
Israel's
nuclear
arsenal
a
true
deterrent.
Iran
may
very
well
feel
the
same
threat
from
Israel,
thus
advancing
it's
nuclear
program
and
development
of
nuclear
weapons
as
a
deterrent
for
fear
of
a
Israel
nuclear
strike.
Iran
already
has
admitted
to
withholding
information
from
The
International
Atomic
Energy
Agency
and
now
as
agreed
to
stricter
inspections.
With
the
fall
of
Saddam
Hussein
and
the
former
Soviet
Union,
one
might
argue
this
point
concerning
the
disarmament
of
Israel.
But,
there
will
always
be
some
new
threat
or
dictator
in
the
Mid
East,
or
Europe,
that
would
destroy
Israel
or
The
Jewish
people.
It's
been
that
way
for
4,000
years.
And
let's
not
forget
Pakistan
and
India's
recent
membership
into
the
nations
with
nuclear
weapons.
The
fall
of
The
Soviet
Union
did
not
mean
it's
fall
or
loss
of
thermonuclear
weapons.
The
area
of
the
old
Soviet
Union
still
has
the
largest
arsenal
of
nuclear
weapons
in
the
world
today
which
is
burdened
with
the
poorest
security
to
protect
it.
A
terrorist
organization
or
a
nation
could
buy
a
nuclear
device
from
numerous
sources
and
detonate
it
on
a
chosen
city,
it's
just
a
matter
of
time.
FROM
THE
COLD
WAR
TO
STAR
WARS
-------------------------------
2003
DECEMBER;
Since
The
United
States
withdrew
from
the
ABM
Treaty
in
2002
it
has
paved
the
way
for
a
missile
defense
system.
The
Pentagon
awarded
the
government
contract
to
Northrop
Grumman
and
Raytheon
for
the
development
of
a
high
speed
rocket
to
intercept
and
destroy
a
incoming
missile
aimed
at
American
soil..
Northrop
Grumman
CEO
Ronald
Sugar
stated
it
will
be
fully
deployable
from
a
land
or
sea
based
launch
site.
Japan
and
Australia
have
already
shown
support
of
the
missile
system
and
wish
to
be
participants.
No
doubt
other
nations
will
follow
due
to
the
recent
actions
of
North
Korea
which
now
has
at
least
a
few
nuclear
missiles
ready
for
launch
and
Iran
will
no
doubt
have
the
same
nuclear
capabilities
in
the
very
near
future.
The
American
Physical
Society
has
raised
serious
doubts
about
the
system
where
a
missile
is
launched
to
hit
another
missile
in
flight.
Physicist
Fredrick
Lamb,
who
is
a
American
Physical
Society
chairman
stated,
"
It's
more
difficult
than
people
had
thought."
To
explain
part
of
the
problem,
Lamb
stated
that
solid-fuel
missiles
would
be
virtually
impossible
to
bring
down
with
the
current
technology
available,
and
won't
likely
be
available
within
the
next
10
to
15
years.
Lamb
ended
his
opinion
with
this,
"We
aren't
saying
that
a
boost-phase
missile
to
intercept
a
solid-fuel
missile
is
impossible
and
this
theory
doesn't
violate
the
laws
of
physics.
But
is
it
worth
the
expense?
Can't
we
make
ourselves
safer
by
spending
the
money
on
something
else?"
Clearly
a
judgment
call
needs
to
be
made
concerning
the
expense,
the
time,
and
the
resources
of
such
a
missile
system.
But
intelligent
judgment
calls
of
this
nature
have
taken
a
back
seat
and
reason
has
went
the
way
of
the
dinosaur,
it
has
become
extinct.
In
the
year
2004,
ten
interceptor
missiles
will
be
operational
and
the
so-called
shield
of
defense
will
become
a
reality.
Our
site
has
reported
on
this
story
before
but
felt
it
needed
another
view
and
the
perspective
of
it's
function.
The
beginning
of
this
type
of
defense
stems
from
a
speech
made
in
1983
by
the
United
States
President
Ronald
Reagan.
His
speech
included
the
term
STAR
WARS
which
was
what
he
visioned
as
a
space
satellite,
or
a
space
station
capable
to
intercept
and
then
destroy
missiles
launched
by
another
country
before
hitting
American
soil.
The
now
infamous
Reagan
speech
contained
the
usual
political
rhetoric
and
a
distorted
view
of
the
technology
and
the
enormous
cost
of
such
a
program.
President
Reagan's
speech
contained,
"
I
call
upon
the
american
scientific
community,
those
who
have
given
us
the
atomic
bomb
and
other
nuclear
weapons
to
turn
their
great
talents
and
proceed
with
the
STAR
WARS
technology
in
the
name
of
mankind
and
world
peace."
The
cost
of
the
current
deployment
of
a
missile
defense
system
will
be
9
billion
dollars
a
year
for
the
next
five
years.
The
cost
of
actually
deploying
this
system
and
it's
various
components
and
operations
could
reach
1
trillion
dollars.
Our
government's
current
mind
set
is
still
in
the
cold
war
era
of
The
United
States
and
the
now
collapsed
Soviet
Union.
Many
people
who
are
in
The
Pentagon
feel
that
the
mere
fact
that
The
United
States
would
have
a
missile
shield
will
be
a
deterrent
to
any
country
involved
in
a
missile
launch
against
The
United
States.
The
cold
war
ended
over
a
decade
ago
but
the
fear
of
a
nuclear
strike
remains
possible.
One
Pentagon
official
stated
that
the
system's
success
at
hitting
a
incoming
missile
would
be
zero.
The
idea
of
knocking
down
a
bullet
with
another
bullet
is
virtually
impossible,
and
even
if
it
were
possible,
the
detonation
of
a
nuclear
weapon
in
the
atmosphere
may
cause
less
damage
than
one
exploding
on
the
ground,
and
perhaps
it
might
cause
more
damage
due
to
a
major
fall
out,
or
the
unknown
effect
it
would
create
since
a
test
of
a
atmospheric
nuclear
explosion
has
never
been
attempted.
-----------------
A
Nuclear
Test
of
a
Hydrogen
Bomb
in
1946
which
yielded
a
force
of
21
kilotons.
The
bomb
site
was
Bikini
Atoll.
The
image
below
is
of
various
military
and
scientists
watching
a
another
test
of
a
Nuclear
bomb
in
the
area
called
Enewetak
Atoll
in
1951
which
yielded
a
force
of
81
kilotons.
The
man
credited
with
these
historic
photographs
had
Michael
Light,
author
of
the
book
100
SUNS
stating,
"It
exists.
It
happened.
It
is
happening.
May
no
future
nuclear
detonation
photographs
be
made,
ever."
How
soon
we
forget
that
history
repeats
itself
and
the
folly
of
mankind.
-----------------
NUCLEAR
WAR
GROWS
NEARER

AUGUST
2003
The
Global
Nation's
Nuclear
community
grows
larger
and
the
threat
of
a
World
War
holocaust
looms
in
the
near
future.Above
a
North
Korean
rally
of
over
one
million
people
gather
to
celebrate
North
Korea's
withdrawl
from
the
Nuclear
Non-Proliferation
Treaty.
Already
in
a
earlier
missile
testing
one
of
Korean's
test
missiles
flew
over
the
Japanese
mainlandand
has
caused
massive
concern
in
the
Asian
community.
Pictured
on
the
left
is
the
near
completion
of
Iran's
Bushehr
nuclear
reactor.
In
July
of
2003
Iran
conducted
a
successful
missile
test
of
it's
Shahab-3
missile,
which
can
carry
a
2,200
pound
payload
as
far
as
1,500
kilometers.
Iran's
announcement
of
it's
successfull
test
suggested
to
the
world
that
the
Shahab-3
missile
is
capable
of
carrying
a
nuclear
warhead.
Below
2003
Iran
Leader
Ayatollah
Ali
Khamenei
observes
Shab-3
Missile.
------------------------------------
The
US
Building
Up
It's
Nuclear
Arsenal
JUNE
19,
2003:
Not
only
is
The
United
States
accelerating
in
new
and
more
powerful
super
computers
they
are
also
rebuilding
their
nuclear
arsenal.
Over
$500
million
in
construction
is
already
being
used
by
building
missile
silos
in
areas
of
Alaska.
One
Alaskan
silo
located
in
Fort
Greely,
near
Delta
Junction,
Alaska
is
projected
to
be
fully
operational
by
the
year
2004.
Numerous
missile
silos
which
are
under
construction
are
intended
for
a
missile
defense
system
for
the
protection
against
incoming
war
heads
launched
at
the
United
States.
But
even
if
the
theory
of
a
defense
system
were
to
work
in
which
a
missile
would
be
fired
at
another
incoming
missile,
the
nuclear
blast
in
the
atmosphere
would
be
almost
as
devastating
as
a
ground
impact.
One
can
only
wonder
why
The
United
States
condemns
countries
like
North
Korea
and
now
Iran
on
their
nuclear
projects
while
The
United
States
is
building
up
it's
own
arsenal.
The
United
States
is
the
only
nation
in
history
(
So
far.
)
that
has
used
nuclear
weapons
war,
so
as
a
outsider
I
can
understand
the
concerns
of
other
countries
and
the
concerns
of
the
American
people.
A
atomic
detonation
in
the
atmosphere
would
rain
radiation
over
thousands
of
square
miles
thus
contaminating
food,
water,
and
human
beings
as
well.
On
June
19,
2003
The
Wall
Street
Journal
reported
the
International
Atomic
Energy
board
had
met
due
to
the
concerns
of
Iran's
open
development
of
nuclear
weapons.
President
George
Bush
was
reported
as
saying
the
world
must
come
together
to
make
it
clear
to
Iran
that
it
will
not
tolerate
the
construction
of
nuclear
weapons.
As
for
myself,
I
would
rather
die
in
a
nuclear
blast
rather
than
live
in
the
aftermath
of
a
nuclear
explosion.
THE
WORLD'S
NUCLEAR
ARSENOL
GROWING
April
29,2003:
North
Korean
officials
told
American
diplomats
at
a
meeting
in
Beijing
today
that
they
already
possessed
nuclear
weapons
and
had
begun
making
bomb
grade
plutonium,
officials
of
the
Bush
administration
and
several
informed
Asian
nations
said.
President
Bush
told
NBC
News
that
North
Korea
was
"back
to
the
old
blackmail
game,"
and
he
insisted
that
he
would
not
be
intimidated.
The
White
House
said
Mr.
Bush
would
make
no
decisions
until
he
fully
consulted
with
allies,
including
South
Korea
and
Japan.
The
South
Korean
president,
Roh
Moo
Hyun,
is
expected
to
visit
Washington.
The
Central
Intelligence
Agency
has
long
believed
that
North
Korea
probably
reprocessed
enough
nuclear
material
before
its
1994
"freeze"
agreement
with
the
United
States
to
develop
two
nuclear
weapons
during
the
first
Bush
administration.
But
the
evidence
has
always
been
murky,
based
partly
on
an
assessment
of
North
Korea's
technical
capabilities.
North
Korea
has
never
tested
a
nuclear
device,
and
it
is
unclear
whether
it
could
make
one
small
enough
to
deliver
on
one
of
its
ballistic
missiles
as
of
May
2003.
Mr.
Bush
has
limited
time
to
find
a
way
to
stop
North
Korea's
program
before
it
obtains
a
sizable
enough
arsenal
to
store
some
weapons
and
threaten
to
sell
others.
North
Korean
negotiator,
Li
Gun,
suggested
to
American
officials
that
whether
North
Korea
tested
or
marketed
its
nuclear
materials
would
depend
on
American
actions.
North
Korea
possesses
the
fifth
largest
standing
military
army
in
the
world
with
over
1
million
armed
soldiers.
North
Korean
President
Kim
Jong
and
his
nuclear
weapons
program
would
have
a
horrific
effect
on
the
stability
of
Asia
and
the
rest
of
the
world.
China's
nuclear
arsenal
is
no
secret
and
the
tensions
between
the
latest
nuclear
brotherhood
of
nations
which
now
include
India
and
Pakistan
whom
are
at
conflict
makes
this
region
of
the
world
a
prime
target
for
nuclear
war.
India
and
Pakistan
have
broken
a
two
year
silence
to
negotiate
some
sort
of
resolve
over
the
disputed
Himalayan
region
which
both
nations
have
claimed
as
their
province
and
have
almost
brought
them
to
the
brink
of
war,
possibly
a
nuclear
conflict.
Pakistan's
Zafarullah
and
India's
Atal
Bihari
had
a
brief
10
minute
phone
conference
in
April
of
2003
to
discuss
possible
peace
options
and
to
advert
a
war.
Much
more
was
revealed
when
Iran's
nuclear
capabilities
where
far
more
advanced
than
reported.
Iran
has
already
began
a
uranium
enrichment
plant
in
the
city
of
Nantanz,
located
in
central
Iran.
The
United
States
has
made
allegations
that
Iran
intends
to
withdraw
from
Non-Proliferation
Treaty
which
would
permit
it
to
manufacture
nuclear
weapons,
the
same
step
than
North
Korea
took
in
2002.
Iran
will
soon
be
a
nuclear
threat
(
if
not
already
)
and
Israel
will
defend
itself
against
any
nuclear
attack
from
the
Arab
world
with
their
nuclear
arsenal.
North
Korea
has
passed
ballistic
missile
technology
to
Iran,
Syria,
and
Pakistan
and
possibly
nuclear
technology
as
well.
These
nations
all
have
one
thing
in
common,
they
have
poor
economies,
and
starving
populations
which
is
a
dangerous
combination
in
any
governmental
situation.
North
Korea
On
Verge
of
Nuclear
ICBM
Capabilities

September,1999
Pyongyang
tentatively
agrees
to
halt
missile
tests.North
Korea
has
agreed
to
a
deal
with
the
United
States
to
halt
testing
of
its
long-range
ballistic
missiles
while
the
two
countries
continue
talks
on
improving
relations,
U.S.
National
Security
Adviser
Samuel
Berger
saidTuesday.
In
return,
the
United
States
is
considering
measures
to
ease
sanctions
against
the
reclusive
communist
state,
Berger
told
reporters.North
Korea's
launch
of
of
a
three
stage
ballistic
missile
test
that
flew
over
Japan
in
1998
stunned
governments
around
the
region.US
Military
experts
warn
the
possibility
of
nations
such
as
North
Korea,Iraq
and
Iran
will
acquire
the
technology
and
be
able
to
deliver
ballistic
missiles
on
United
States
soil
within
the
next
10
to
15
years.North
Korea's
development
of
weapons
of
mass
destruction
poses
an
increasing
threat
to
the
United
States
and
its
allies,
according
to
a
study
by
a
panel
of
congressional
Republicans.
In
addition
to
chemical
and
biological
weapons,
there
is
''significant
evidence''
that
North
Korea
is
continuing
to
develop
nuclear
weapons
despite
a
commitment
five
years
ago
to
remain
nuclear-free,
the
report
released
Wednesday
finds.
Also,
a
dramatic
improvement
in
North
Korea's
missile
capabilities
now
permits
the
country
to
reach
U.S.
territory
with
a
''high
explosive
chemical,
biological,
or
possibly
nuclear
weapon,''
according
to
the
report.
July
1,1999:Russian
Bombers
fly
within
striking
distance
of
U.S.
Moscow
flexing
post-Cold
War
military
muscles
U.S.
fighter
jets
scramble
after
bombers
Second
Russian
military
surprise
for
NATO
and
Moscow
doesn't
notify
U.S.
of
military
exercise.
Two
of
Russia's
long-range
bombers
flew
around
Iceland
last
Friday
coming
within
striking
distance
of
the
United
States
for
the
first
time
"in
five
or
six
years,"Defense
Secretary
WilliamCohen
said
Thursday.
The
bombers
were
participating
in
the
"largest(Russian
military)
exercises
inthe
last
10
years,"
said
another
Pentagon
official.
Although
they
apparently
were
not
carrying
weapons
at
the
time,
the
two
"TU-95
Bear"
bombers
have
the
ability
to
launch
nuclear-armed
cruisemissiles
capable
of
striking
targets
in
the
United
States
from
the
area
around
Iceland,
but
"did
not
violate
Iceland's
sovereign
airspace,"according
to
well-informedmilitary
sources.
Iceland
is
a
member
of
NATO.
U.S.
fighter
jets
scramble
after
bombers
were
noticed.Russian
aircraft
caused
enough
concern
that
a
pair
of
U.S.
Air
Force
F-15
fighter
jets
scrambled
from
NATO's
Keflavik
air
base
in
Iceland.
The
flight
of
the
long-range
Russian
bombers
took
some
at
the
Pentagon
by
surprise,
sources
said.
"We
didn't
think
they
could
do
that
any
more,"
said
one
officer
close
to
the
incident.
This
demonstrates
some
kind
of
capability"in
the
Russian
military
that
many
observers
thought
they
had
lost.""Lots
of
people
thought
they
couldn't
do
stuff
like
that
anymore,"
said
a
well-placed
military
official.
"Maybe
we
were
wrong."
Russian
officials
did
not
inform
the
United
States
in
advance
of
the
start
of
the
military
exercises,
scheduled
for
June
21-26,
and
they
did
not
alert
Washington
to
the
somewhat
provocative
flight
of
the
Russian
bombers.
The
appearance
of
the
bombers
near
Iceland
may
have
been
intended
to
send
a
message
to
the
United
States,
according
to
a
Pentagon
official
who
said
the
act
seemed
"calculated."
He
said
it
may
be
a
way
for
the
Russian
military
leadership
to
say,
"We're
still
around."
The
official
added
the
exercises
and
the
unannounced
flight
of
the
bombers
"looked
like
a
return
to
old
Soviet-style
war
fighting
doctrine."
Also
North
Korea
is
preparing
to
test-launch
a
missilewith
a
possible
rangeof
6,400km,
said
the
United
States.
A
missile
launched
by
North
Korea
last
year
passed
over
Japan.
May
1999:China's
Stealing
of
United
States
Nuclear
Weapons
Technology
May
Lead
To
Next
Cold
War
The
May,1999
Cox
report
established
China
engages
in
espionage
against
The
United
States.
(I'm
sure
the
US
does
the
same
though)
China
has
obtained
secret
data
on
every
US
nuclear
warhead
and
many
systems
operations.For
two
decades
China
has
used
spies,front
companies,
and
scientific
exchanges
to
gain
some
of
the
most
precious
military
and
nuclear
secrets.China
obtained
classified
data
on
America's
most
advanced
war
head,the
W-88.The
CIA
discovered
this
four
years
ago
when
a
Chinese
walk-in-agent
came
into
the
CIA
and
handed
them
a
Chinese
classified
document
showing
espionage
and
the
secrets
of
many
US
military
nuclear
weapons.
The
United
States
is
now
beefing
up
its
military
presence
in
Japan
while
China
is
doing
the
same
by
playing
up
its
ties
with
Russia
and
North
Korea.Officials
at
The
Department
of
Justice
refused
four
separate
phone
taps
requested
by
the
FBI
on
suspected
spy
Wen
Ho
Lee
at
the
Los
Alamos
weapons
lab.Lee
has
denied
all
accusations
against
him
and
no
charges
have
been
filed
against
Mr.
Lee
but
he
was
fired
for
security
lapses.The
uncertain
status
of
the
case
has
infuriated
some
Government
officials
and
lawmakers,
primarily
Republicans,who
say
Lee
may
be
responsible
for
the
most
damaging
espionage
of
the
post-cold-war
era.
That
conclusion
was
reinforced
last
month,
when
a
Congressional
panel
found
that
China
had
used
nuclear
secrets
stolen
from
American
labs
to
develop
advanced
miniature
warheads
and
a
mobile
ballistic
missile.
Lee's
lawyer,
Mark
Holscher,said
his
client
was
an
innocent
scientist
who
had
been
publicly
branded
as
a
spy
even
though
he
had
not
even
been
charged
with
any
crime.
Why
does
China
covet
America's
nuclear
technology?Perhaps
it
would
help
China
build
a
more
better
and
smaller
war
heads
with
more
destructive
power.China's
leaders
have
good
reason
to
worry
as
their
aging
1950
nuclear
missile
arsenal
is
incapable
of
a
second
strike
retaliation
against
the
United
States.There
is
no
mystery
that
China
has
purchased
legally
high
tech
super
computers
from
the
United
States.The
Cox
report
stated
these
computers
have
been
used
in
nuclear
assimilated
warfare
programs
to
asses
hypothetical
explosions
rather
than
doing
real
underground
nuclear
explosions.The
Cox
report
also
states
the
secrets
acquired
from
the
United
States
could
be
used
against
US
nuclear
submarines
as
China
also
acquired
US
radar
technology.On
June
21
in
the
wake
of
allegations
of
spying
by
China,
the
federal
government
has
begun
polygraphing
an
estimated
5,000
nuclear
weapons
scientists
and
other
sensitive
employees
at
the
Department
of
Energy.This
is
a
another
Big
Brother
blunder
as
(1.)Lie
detector
tests
can
not
be
used
in
court
because
they
are
only
accurate
30%
of
the
time
at
best.(2.)Any
good
spy
or
cop
can
pass
a
polygraphing
test.
In
July
of
1999~China
announced
it
had
the
technology
to
make
neutron
bombs,
but
gave
no
details.
"China
officially
announced
here
today
that
it
has
already
mastered
the
neutron
bomb
design
technology,"the
official
Xinhua
news
agency
said
in
a
one-paragraph
report.
The
announcement
came
amid
a
dispute
with
rival
Taiwan,
which
abandoned
its
"one
China"
policy
that
has
helped
underpin
East
Asian
security
for
decades.
A
U.S.
congressional
report
said
in
May
China
had
acquired
U.S.
secrets
about
seven
nuclearweapons
and
the
neutron
bomb
through
20
years
of
espionage.
The
United
States
learned
in
1996
thatChina
stole
classified
U.S.
neutron
bomb
information
from
a
U.S.
government
lab
that
could
be
used
on
Chinese
intermediate-
and-short-range
ballistic
missiles.
U.S.-developed
neutron
bombs
are
designed
to
kill
with
extremely
high
concentrations
of
radiation
while
sharply
reducing
blast
and
heat
effects,
leaving
buildings
largely
intact.
October,1998
Israel
Antimissle
System
Addresses
Mideast
Threat
The
successful
test
launch
of
an
Israeli
antimissile
system
establishes
the
country
as
a
leader
in
a
race
to
develop
an
effective
deterrent
to
the
rising
threat
of
nuclear
proliferation
in
the
Middle
East.
Despite
the
attempts
of
the
United
States
to
curb
the
growing
of
weapons
of
mass
destruction
in
the
Middle
East,Israel
has
had
to
meet
this
threat
by
deploying
and
testing
it's
new
anti
missile
system
named
ARROW.Developed
by
Israeli
Aircraft
Industries
and
funded
in
part
by
the
US
Defense
Department.Israel's
Defense
Ministry
said
it
intends
to
deploy
the
ARROW
next
year
after
a
third
and
final
round
of
testing.The
US
has
also
been
lobbying
Japan
to
deploy
a
similar
system
in
case
of
a
threat/attack
by
North
Korean
Scud
Missiles.Since
the
1967
Six-Day
War,Israel
has
enjoyed
military
superiority
in
the
region.But
the
prospect
and
inevitability
of
Iran,Iraq,and
Syria
to
develop
and
launch
biological
and
nuclear
weapons
that
could
reach
Israeli
cities
within
five
years
is
a
certainty.
Iraq
already
proved
it
could
launch
Scud
Missiles
to
Israeli
cities
during
the
1990
Desert
Storm
War.
Israeli
jets
bombed
power
plants
and
bridges
in
Lebanon
June,1999
in
retaliation
for
Hezbollah
rocket
attacks
on
northern
Israel.
It
was
the
broadest
offensive
against
Lebanon
since
1996.
The
escalation
in
hostilities
followed
Hezbollah
guerrilla
attacks
in
northern
Israel,
which
Hezbollah
said
was
in
response
to
the
wounding
of
a
Lebanese
civilian
during
Israeli
attacks
in
previous
days.
At
least
nine
have
been
killed
in
this
latest
round
of
violence-seven
in
Lebanon
and
two
in
Israel.
"As
long
as
they
will
continue
their
attacks,
we
are
going
to
retaliate,
and
we
are
going
to
retaliate
as
heavily
and
as
much
as
we
can,"
Brig.
Gen.
Oded
Ben-Ami,
the
chief
Israeli
army
spokesman
stated."We
don't
have
any
intention
to
escalate
the
situation
in
the
north
but
we
cannot
keep
quiet
while
Hezbollah
is
violating
the
Grapes
of
Wrath
understandings
and
targeting
civilians."
Under
an
agreement
following
Israel's
last
big
offensive
in
1996,
known
in
Israel
as
"Grapes
of
Wrath,"
Israel
and
Lebanese
guerrillas
are
supposed
to
refrain
from
attacks
against
or
from
civilian
areas.
The
Israeli
Defense
Force
said
airstrikes
hit
a
power
facility
in
the
eastern
sector
of
Beirut
in
the
pre-dawn
hours
.
A
few
hours
earlier,
three
Israeli
airstrikes
targeted
a
separate
power
station
on
a
hill
overlooking
Beirut,
knocking
out
electricity
to
parts
of
the
city.Warplanes
also
hit
a
power
substation
in
the
eastern
city
of
Baalbek,
and
four
airstrikes
targeted
bridges
on
the
main
coastal
road
to
southern
Lebanon.
Lebanese
Prime
Minister
Salim
Hoss
issued
a
statement
saying,
"What
happened
amounts
to
a
catastrophe,
and
is
new
proof
of
Israel's
unlimited
barbarianism."
He
added
that
he
was
in
contact
with
ambassadors
of
the
United
States
and
other
nations
to
intercede
with
Israel
to
halt
the
escalation.
INDIA~PAKISTAN
NUCLEAR
TEST
TRIGGER
GLOBAL
ALERT
A
military
coup
took
place
in
October,1999
when
Pakistan
military
general
Musharraf
over
threw
the
Pakistan
elected
government
ran
by
Pakistan
Prime
Minister
Sharif.The
coup
came
only
hours
after
Musharraf
had
learned
that
Prime
Minister
Sharif
was
planning
to
oust
the
military
leader.
General
Musharraf
who
was
away
in
Sri
Lanka
flew
back
to
Pakistan
to
find
his
loyal
troops
surrounding
government
buildings.Prime
Minister
Sharif
was
placed
under
house
arrest
and
placed
the
country
under
martial
law
which
dissolved
all
parliament
and
elected
government
officials
and
it's
constitution.Tension
between
the
two
leaders
began
in
July,1999
when
under
pressure
from
the
United
States,Prime
Minister
Sharif
ordered
the
Pakistan
army
to
surrender
land
and
withdraw
from
territories
in
India
in
which
it
had
acquired.The
coup
will
surely
heighten
tensions
between
the
world's
latest
new
nuclear
powers
Pakistan
and
India.Pakistan
awaited
announcements
by
its
new
military
leadership
with
increasing
apprehension
Sunday
as
authorities
received
orders
to
arrest
associates
of
deposed
Prime
Minister
Nawaz
Sharif.
The
orders
by
Gen.
Pervez
Musharraf
represent
his
attempt
to
clean
up
widespread
government
corruption.
Musharraf
was
to
announce
his
plans
for
governing
Pakistan.The
European
Union
condemned
the
military
takeover
and
threatened
to
cut
off
aid
if
democracy
is
not
restored.Gen.
Pervaiz
Musharraf
said
he
would
welcome
resumed
talks
with
India
but
made
it
clear
that
Pakistan
would
continue
to
support
Kashmiri
militants
seeking
independence
from
India
with
moral,
political
and
diplomatic
backing.
In
August,1999
Pakistani
Foreign
Minister
Sartaj
Aziz
announced
Wednesday
that
his
country's
military
forces
were
on
alert
after
the
downing
of
a
Pakistani
patrol
plane
by
Indian
jet
fighters."Obviously
we
have
put
our
forces
on
alert
in
case
there
is
anything
from
that
(Indian)
side,"
Aziz
said.
"One
has
to
be
in
an
Thursday
called
India's
shooting
down
of
a
Pakistan
navy
plane
"barbaric"
and
"cowardly"
and
said
it
would
complicate
peace
talks
between
the
arch
rivals.
"It
was
a
very
barbaric
act
and
I
think
it
was
also
a
very
cowardly
act,"
Sharif
told
reporters
after
offering
Islamic
prayers
at
the
sombre
funeral
ceremony
for
the
16
officers
and
sailors
killed
in
the
incident.India
is
pledging
to
continue
its
nuclear
weapons
program
and
warns
it
will
retaliate
for
any
nuclear
attack
with
a
nuclear
strike
of
its
own,
according
to
a
draft
doctrine
released
Tuesday
by
India's
National
Security
Advisory
Board.
"We
should
remain
in
a
position
to
retaliate
if
nuclear
weapons
are
used
against
us,"
said
Brajesh
Mishra,
national
security
adviser
to
the
prime
minister.India
and
Pakistan
have
also
mad
it
public
they
have
the
means
and
technolgy
to
manufacture
the
neutron
bomb.China
has
also
strengthened
it's
security
and
border
lines
due
to
the
years
of
conflict
with
India.
In
June,1999,India’s
home
minister
said
his
country
should
prepare
for
war
with
Pakistan,
unless
Pakistani-supported
guerrillas
withdrew
from
Indian-controlled
Kashmir.
Pakistan
said
it
was
tightening
security
in
case
of
an
Indian
attack.Pakistan’s
prime
minister,
presides
over
a
robust
parliamentary
majority,
a
tame
army
and
a
nervous
press.
But
his
image
of
omnipotence
has
been
called
into
question
by
the
violent
dispute
with
India
over
Kashmir.
Surely,
the
man
who
invited
his
Indian
counterpart
to
talk
peace
in
Lahore
four
months
ago
would
not
snatch
Indian
territory
from
behind
the
shield
of
nuclear
weapons?Indian
fighter
jets
pounded
infiltrators
in
Kashmir
mountain
hideouts
in
June
of
1999
as
the
United
States
stepped
up
pressure
on
Pakistan
to
bring
the
confrontation
with
its
arch-foe
off
the
boil.
India
denied
that
Washington's
involvement
amounted
to
thirdparty
mediation
in
adispute
which
has
plunged
the
nuclear
neighbors
into
war
twice
since
their
independence
in
1947.
India
in
June,1999
delayed
proposed
peace
talks
with
Pakistan
and
sealed
off
parts
of
Kashmir,
possibly
to
prepare
for
a
new
offensive
against
Muslim
insurgents
in
the
disputed
border
region.
Pakistan's
offer
to
send
Foreign
Minister
Sartaj
Aziz
to
New
Delhi
for
discussions
Monday
"is
not
convenient,"
an
Indian
foreign
ministry
statement
said
Saturday.
Pakistan
has
accused
India
of
stalling
the
talks,
planned
to
defuse
the
escalating
conflict
in
the
strategic
Himalayan
territory
of
Kashmir.
India
delays
peace
talks
amid
Pakistan
border
fighting.A
war
toll
could
be
devastating.
India
releases
IDs
of
dead
Pakistanis
and
United
States
won't
interfere.
India
on
Saturday
delayed
proposed
peace
talks
with
Pakistan
and
sealed
off
parts
of
Kashmir,
possibly
to
prepare
for
a
new
offensive
against
Muslim
insurgents
in
the
disputed
border
region.Pakistan's
offer
to
send
Foreign
Minister
Sartaj
Aziz
to
New
Delhi
for
discussions
Monday
"is
not
convenient,"
an
Indian
foreign
ministry
statement
said
Saturday.
"We
will
revert
shortly
to
the
government
of
Pakistan
with
alternative
dates,"
said
foreign
ministry
spokesman
Raminder
Singh
Jassal.
Pakistan
has
accused
India
of
stalling
the
talks,planned
to
defuse
the
escalating
conflict
in
the
strategic
Himalayan
territory
of
Kashmir.
The
delay
could
be
an
attempt
by
New
Delhi
to
gain
ground
and
negotiate
from
a
position
of
strength,
according
to
political
observers.
Indicating
a
possible
escalation
in
the
fighting,
the
Indian
army
on
Saturday
barred
reporters
and
civilians
from
much
of
the
region.Previously,
a
few
journalists
with
authorized
passes
and
civilians
in
supply
trucks
had
been
the
only
nonmilitary
traffic
allowed
through
checkpoints.
Military
observers
fear
casualties
would
be
high
because
of
the
difficulty
of
removing
the
insurgents."An
onslaught
is
possible,"
said
defense
analyst
Rahui
Bhandari.
"But
the
casualty
rate
is
going
to
be
extremely
high
because
the
intruders
are
in
a
strategically
advantageous
position."Thousands
of
residents
of
Kargil,
Dras
and
other
towns
and
villages
already
have
fled.Indian
army
spokesman
Brigadier
Arun
Chopra
revised
the
estimated
number
of
infiltrators
killed
to
200
--
about
half
the
previous
figure.At
least
56
Indian
soldiers
or
airmen
have
been
killed
in
the
fighting,
Chopra
said.
Fourteen
are
reported
missing.
The
Indian
army
on
Saturday
released
what
it
called
evidence
that
Pakistani
military
personnel
are
among
the
intruders
photocopies
of
identity
cards
of
three
dead
Pakistani
soldiers.
India
has
said
the
guerrillas
include
Afghan
mercenaries
and
Pakistani
troops.
Pakistan
denies
its
solders
are
involved.
The
bodies
of
the
Pakistani
soldiers,
found
Thursday
about
seven
kilometers(four
miles)
inside
Indian
territory,
would
be
handed
over
to
Pakistan,
Indian
army
Brig.
Gen.
Mohan
Bhandari
said.The
army
said
it
had
pushed
back
the
infiltrators
after
heavy
fighting
in
the
Yaldoh
region,
and
Indian
troops
were
in
a
strong
position
in
Turtuk
andChorbat
La.
"The
ration
lines
of
the
infiltrators
have
been
cut
in
some
areas,
but
they
are
still
getting
supplies
in
other
areas,"
Chopra
said.
The
toughest
battles
are
being
fought
near
the
northern
towns
of
Dras,
Mashkah,
Kaksar
and
Batalik.The
guerrillas
hold
at
least
eight
strategic
peaks
in
a
snowy
mountainous
wasteland
in
northern
Kashmir.
India
claims
to
have
cleared
10
other
peaks
of
intruders,
who
seized
the
positions
last
month.United
States
won't
interfere.
The
U.S.
ambassador
to
India
said
Washingto
would
not
interfere
in
the
dispute."Kashmir
is
an
issue
which
can
be
only
settled
by
peaceful
talks
between
the
two
countries,
without
any
intervention.
The
United
States
realizes
this,"
said
Ambassador
Richard
Celeste.The
United
States
has
urged
the
two
nuclear-capable
neighbors
to
peacefully
solve
the
conflict.India
and
Pakistan
have
fought
three
wars
since
their
independence
from
Britain
in
1947,
two
of
them
over
Kashmir.
India
controls
two-thirds
of
the
territory
and
Pakistan
the
remainder;
both
claim
all
of
it.
A
cease-fire
line
drawn
by
the
United
Nations
separates
the
two
zones;
New
Delhi
has
accused
Pakistan
of
trying
to
alter
that
boundary.
India's
underground
tests
of
three
nuclear
device's
on
May
11,1998
show
that
it's
new
Hindu-
nationalists-led
government
means
business
when
it
says
it
wants
to
make
India
a
world
power.
But
the
tests
entail
grave
risks,and
a
costly
deadly
arms
race
with
China
and
Pakistan.India
is
now
a
more
important
player
on
the
global
nuclear
stage
than
ever
before,and
it
now
has
a
government
that
is
eager
to
act
bodly,and
some
might
say
rashly,to
stand
up
to
perceived
threats
that
have
long
worried
it's
leaders.The
tests
are
the
most
dramatic
step
taken
by
the
government
since
the
Hindu-
nationalists
Bharatiya
Janata
Party
came
into
power
at
the
head
of
a
coalition
seven
weeks
ago.
India
feels
threatened
by
Muslim
Pakistan
to
the
west,by
China
to
to
the
north,by
the
the
multinational
corporations
that
have
entered
India's
markets.Pakistan's
foreign
minister,Gohar
Ayub
Khan,told
parliament
yesterday
that
Pakistan
reserves
the
right
to
take
all
appropriate
measures
for
its
own
security.
Such
threats
will
be
met
by
the
determination
of
the
Pakistan
nation.India's
Mr.
Mishra
said
India
thinks
it
likely
that
Pakistan
will
now
tests
its
own
nuclear
devices,beleived
to
have
been
acquired
with
Chinese
aid.But
the
real
target
of
of
India's
nuclear
program
is
the
perceived
long
term
threat
from
China.In
recent
weeks,Defense
Minister
George
Fernandes
has
broken
a
long-standing
political
taboo
by
naming
China
as
the
main
menace
to
India.
For
the
world,a
military
war
between
China
and
India
would
be
castatrophic.Other
nations
such
as
Iraq,Iran,and
Israel
will
now
have
less
incentive
to
stop
their
testing
programs.Before
Monday,
May
11,1998;only
five
nations
were
declared
nuclear
powers,The
United
States,France,Britain
China
and
Russia."Pakistan
is
going
to
test
next,there
is
no
question
about
it.",said
Michael
Krepon,
president
of
the
Stimson
Center,which
tracks
nonproliferation
efforts.India's
explosion
of
three
nuclear
weapons
sent
shock
waves
through
the
CIA.A
day
after
India's
new
Hindu-nationalist-led
government
announced
the
underground
tests,Director
of
the
CIA
George
Tenet
appointed
a
special
team
to
see
why
U.S.
Spy
agencies
failed
to
detect
or
even
know
of
the
nuclear
tests.
Angry
law
makers
on
Capitol
Hill
demanded
answer's
on
the
incompetence
of
the
US
intelligence
agencies.Senate
Intelligence
leader
Senator
Richard
Shelby(AL)
summoned
Mr.
Tenet
and
heads
of
other
spy
agencies
to
closed
door
hearings
to
explain,what
he
called,"a
colossal
failure
of
the
US
Intelligence
community"
and
possibly
the
biggest
intelligence
failure
in
the
last
decade.Former
Army
General
William
Odom,who
headed
the
NSA
which
conducts
global
eavesdropping
said,"It's
pretty
big
damned
deal!There
are
lots
of
people
who
have
got
to
be
feeling
pretty
chagrined
right
now".
"This
is
not
just
a
screw
up
of
a
few
people,but
a
whole
lot."
General
William
Odom
stated.Mr.
Tenet
said
"The
monitoring
of
nuclear
proliferation
is
one
of
the
US
Intelligence
communities
most
important
tasks."
By
testing
the
nuclear
devices,India
has
lifted
a
veil
not
only
on
its
military
capability,but
on
its
fear
and
paranoia
of
China.China's
response
strongly
condemned
India's
tests
and
called
it
totally
unreasonable.Foreign
policy
makers
in
India
traditionally
have
targeted
Pakistan
as
its
main
security
threat.The
uneasy
neighbors
have
fought
three
wars
since
1947.India
has
accused
China
of
giving
Pakistan
missile
and
nuclear
technology.India
and
China
have
a
long
running
disputed
border
problem
on
the
Himalayan
mountains.In
one
brief
war
between
China
and
India
in
1962,China
invaded
India
and
inflicted
heavy
causalities
before
pulling
back.At
least
two-dozen
nations
already
possess
or
are
building
ballistic
missiles
with
the
capability
of
reaching
across
the
Atlantic
and
pacific
oceans.The
arms
race
that
India
has
started
will
have
other
nations
in
pursuit
of
nuclear
and
ballistic
technology
and
will
ignore
any
treaty
of
the
American
Arms
Control
community
to
pursue
their
ambitious
beliefs
and
prove
they
are
a
world
power
to
be
taken
seriously.A
secret
CIA
report,made
public
by
the
Washington
Times
stated
that
13
of
China's
18
long-range
nuclear
missiles
are
targeted
at
United
States
cities.The
goal
for
the
United
States
is
to
deploy
a
defensive
missile
system,which
in
turn,will
provoke
and
incite
the
other
world
powers
to
do
the
same.The
dawn
of
World
War
III
and
Armageddon
is
upon
us
and
as
this
writer
states,"Be
ready...Be
prepared...and
hope
that
you
are
right
with
God
and
be
the
first
to
go
in
a
nuclear
holocaust
,for
the
survivors
of
such
a
cataclysmic
war,will
truly
be
living
a
hell
on
earth."
The
fall
out
of
such
a
war,sometimes
called
nuclear
winter,will
prevent
the
growing
of
food,
life,and
the
scars
of
such
a
devastating
war
will
go
on
for
hundreds
of
years.
On
May
30,1998,Pakistan
concluded
it's
nuclear
test
blasts
that
will
only
now
force
surrounding
nations
to
do
the
same.Pakistan's
nuclear
blast
was
a
18
kiloton
device,which
was
about
the
same
force
of
the
atomic
bomb
dropped
on
Hiroshima
in
World
War
II
but
U.S.
Intelligent
sources
said
the
device
was
closer
to
2
kilotons.
A
military
coup
took
place
in
October,1999
when
Pakistan
military
general
Musharraf
over
threw
the
Pakistan
elected
government
ran
by
Pakistan
Prime
Minister
Sharif.The
coup
came
only
hours
after
Musharraf
had
learned
that
Prime
Minister
Sharif
was
planning
to
oust
the
military
leader.
General
Musharraf
who
was
away
in
Sri
Lanka
flew
back
to
Pakistan
to
find
his
loyal
troops
surrounding
government
buildings.Prime
Minister
Sharif
was
placed
under
house
arrest
and
placed
the
country
under
martial
law
which
dissolved
all
parliament
and
elected
government
officials
and
it's
constitution.Tension
between
the
two
leaders
began
in
July,1999
when
under
pressure
from
the
United
States,Prime
Minister
Sharif
ordered
the
Pakistan
army
to
surrender
land
and
withdraw
from
territories
in
India
in
which
it
had
acquired.The
coup
will
surely
heighten
tensions
between
the
world's
latest
new
nuclear
powers
Pakistan
and
India.Pakistan
awaited
announcements
by
its
new
military
leadership
with
increasing
apprehension
Sunday
as
authorities
received
orders
to
arrest
associates
of
deposed
Prime
Minister
Nawaz
Sharif.
The
orders
by
Gen.
Pervez
Musharraf
represent
his
attempt
to
clean
up
widespread
government
corruption.
Musharraf
was
to
announce
his
plans
for
governing
Pakistan.The
European
Union
condemned
the
military
takeover
and
threatened
to
cut
off
aid
if
democracy
is
not
restored.Gen.
Pervaiz
Musharraf
said
he
would
welcome
resumed
talks
with
India
but
made
it
clear
that
Pakistan
would
continue
to
support
Kashmiri
militants
seeking
independence
from
India
with
moral,
political
and
diplomatic
backing.
Missile
fails
to
intercept
warhead
in
setback
for
program
January
19,
2000
VANDENBURG
AIR
FORCE
The
test
of
a
proposed
National
Missile
Defense
system
met
with
failure
when
an
interceptor
missile
failed
to
collide
in
space
with
a
mock
warhead,
a
U.S.
defense
official
told
CNN."An
intercept
was
not
achieved
for
reasons
unknown
at
this
time,"
spokesman
Air
Force
Lt.
Col.
Rick
Lehner
said.
The
failure
late
Tuesday
will
be
seen
as
a
setback
for
the
program,
which
supporters
had
hoped
to
deploy
as
soon
as
2005.It
will
be
a
number
of
hours
until
data
related
to
various
computerized
components
associated
with
the
system
can
be
analyzed,
Lehner
said.The
test
consisted
of
the
launch
of
an
Intercontinental
Ballistic
Missile
from
Vandenberg
AFB
in
California,
which
catapulted
a
simulated
nuclear
warhead
and
a
number
of
decoys
into
space.
Minutes
later
the
missile
interceptor
--
known
as
a
"kill
vehicle,"
or
by
its
Pentagon
nickname,
"smart
rock"
--
was
launched
from
the
Kwajalein
Atoll
in
the
Pacific
Ocean.
The
planned
intercept,
some
120
to
140
milesabove
the
Earth,
failed.
Tuesday's
test
was
the
second
in
a
series
of
19
test
intercepts
planned
for
the
development
of
the
National
Missile
Defense
(NMD)
system,
but
Tuesday's
test
and
a
scheduled
third
test
were
seen
as
crucial
to
supporters
who
had
hoped
to
put
the
program
on
the
fast
track.The
first
test,
on
October
2,
1999,
succeeded
in
destroying
the
dummy
warhead
but
suffered
from
some
technical
problems
that
were
not
revealed
until
recently
by
the
Pentagon's
Ballistic
Missile
Defense
Organization.
"In
fact,
they
don't
know
whether
the
results
of
the
first
test
tell
them
whether
they
had
a
real
success
or
a
lucky
shot,"
said
Tom
Collina
of
the
Union
of
Concerned
Scientists,
a
group
critical
of
the
system.In
the
first
test,
an
interceptor
missile
fired
from
a
Pacific
island
smashed
a
mock
warhead
more
than
100
miles
out
in
space.
But
critics
argue
that
a
decoy
balloon
near
the
warhead
may
have
inadvertently
helped
the
missile
find
its
target.The
second
test
was
more
complex,
requiring
the
interceptor
to
use
real-time
data
from
satellites
and
ground
radars,
instead
of
navigation
charts
preloaded
into
its
computers.
Following
a
third
intercept
test
scheduled
for
late
April
or
early
May,
the
Pentagon
is
expected
to
make
a
recommendation
to
President
Bill
Clinton
as
to
whether
the
system
is
ready
to
deploy.
The
proposed
system
would
field
100
interceptor
missiles
at
an
Alaska
base
at
a
cost
of
nearly
$13
billion,
possibly
as
soon
as
2005.
The
missiles
would
be
expected
to
defend
all
50
states
against
a
limited
missile
attack
from
countries
such
as
North
Korea,
Iraq
or
Iran.
There
has
been
political
fallout,
including
Russia's
adamant
refusal
to
renegotiate
the
Anti-Ballistic
Missile
treaty
to
allow
the
United
States
to
base
some
interceptors
in
Alaska.
"This
is
a
system
that
has
grave
implications
for
our
relationships
with
Russia
and
China
and
our
NATO
allies
--
none
of
whom
like
this
system,"
said
Collina.
In
his
2001
budget,
to
be
disclosed
February
7,
Clinton
is
expected
to
ask
Congress
for
an
additional
$2.2
billion
for
the
program.
That
would
buy
an
arsenal
of
100
interceptors
and
pay
for
more
testing
and
spare
parts.
|